On 3/12/25 21:48, Yohan Joung wrote:
> this is unnecessary when we know we are overwriting already allocated
> blocks and the overhead of starting a transaction can be significant
> especially for multithreaded workloads doing small writes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yohan Joung <yohan.joung@sk.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index d872f785a996..b55d253f7be9 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -4181,7 +4181,8 @@ static int f2fs_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
> map.m_next_pgofs = &next_pgofs;
> map.m_seg_type = f2fs_rw_hint_to_seg_type(F2FS_I_SB(inode),
> inode->i_write_hint);
> - if (flags & IOMAP_WRITE)
> + if ((flags & IOMAP_WRITE) &&
> + !f2fs_overwrite_io(inode, offset, length))
Can you please add a comment for this change? Otherwise it looks
fine to me.
Thanks,
> map.m_may_create = true;
>
> err = f2fs_map_blocks(inode, &map, F2FS_GET_BLOCK_DIO);