drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
In gfx_v12_0_cp_gfx_load_me_microcode_rs64(), gfx_v12_0_pfp_fini() is
incorrectly used to free 'me' field of 'gfx', since gfx_v12_0_pfp_fini()
can only release 'pfp' field of 'gfx'. The release function of 'me' field
should be gfx_v12_0_me_fini().
Fixes: 52cb80c12e8a ("drm/amdgpu: Add gfx v12_0 ip block support (v6)")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.11+
Signed-off-by: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c
index da327ab48a57..02bc2eddf0c0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c
@@ -2413,7 +2413,7 @@ static int gfx_v12_0_cp_gfx_load_me_microcode_rs64(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
(void **)&adev->gfx.me.me_fw_data_ptr);
if (r) {
dev_err(adev->dev, "(%d) failed to create me data bo\n", r);
- gfx_v12_0_pfp_fini(adev);
+ gfx_v12_0_me_fini(adev);
return r;
}
--
2.42.0.windows.2
Applied. Thanks!
Alex
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 6:09 AM Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
>
> In gfx_v12_0_cp_gfx_load_me_microcode_rs64(), gfx_v12_0_pfp_fini() is
> incorrectly used to free 'me' field of 'gfx', since gfx_v12_0_pfp_fini()
> can only release 'pfp' field of 'gfx'. The release function of 'me' field
> should be gfx_v12_0_me_fini().
>
> Fixes: 52cb80c12e8a ("drm/amdgpu: Add gfx v12_0 ip block support (v6)")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.11+
> Signed-off-by: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c
> index da327ab48a57..02bc2eddf0c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c
> @@ -2413,7 +2413,7 @@ static int gfx_v12_0_cp_gfx_load_me_microcode_rs64(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> (void **)&adev->gfx.me.me_fw_data_ptr);
> if (r) {
> dev_err(adev->dev, "(%d) failed to create me data bo\n", r);
> - gfx_v12_0_pfp_fini(adev);
> + gfx_v12_0_me_fini(adev);
> return r;
> }
>
> --
> 2.42.0.windows.2
>
… > can only release 'pfp' field of 'gfx'. The release function of 'me' field > should be gfx_v12_0_me_fini(). Do you care for an imperative wording in such a change description? https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.14-rc6#n94 Regards, Markus
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.