.../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 1 + .../boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts | 295 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 297 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts
This patchset introduces support for the Redmi Note 8 (codenamed ginkgo). Changes in v2: - Add missing cover letter - Fix up commit message for schema Changes in v3: - Use qcom ids instead of hardcoded msm-id (and other changes suggested by Konrad) - Switch up model properties and qcom properties position Gabriel Gonzales (2): dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Initial support for xiaomi-ginkgo .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 1 + .../boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts | 295 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 297 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts -- 2.48.1
On 3/11/25 1:33 AM, Gabriel Gonzales wrote:
> This patchset introduces support for the Redmi Note 8 (codenamed ginkgo).
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Add missing cover letter
> - Fix up commit message for schema
> Changes in v3:
> - Use qcom ids instead of hardcoded msm-id (and other changes suggested by Konrad)
> - Switch up model properties and qcom properties position
Hi, I noticed that the msm-id is failing the dt-bindings check (need
two values, with the first one being the SoC ID and the second one being
the revision - 0x10000 as there was only ever a single rev of 6125)
I also found this dt:
https://github.com/xiaomi-ginkgo/android_kernel_xiaomi_ginkgo/blob/main/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xiaomi/ginkgo-trinket-overlay.dts
which suggests that the board ID you used may be incorrect
(you put in 22 and the link above says 34 - FWIW 0x22 == 34, maybe
that's related?)
Could you please give the below a shot and see if it still boots?
From ccef64e4058ba657ada5000ec3c2aa9b682c552b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 11:45:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo: Fix up msm/board ID
Include a version in the SoC ID (mostly to appease the bindings
checker) and fix up the board-id according to match the device's BSP
kernel.
Link: https://github.com/xiaomi-ginkgo/android_kernel_xiaomi_ginkgo/blob/main/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xiaomi/ginkgo-trinket-overlay.dts
Fixes: 9b1a6c925c88 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Initial support for xiaomi-ginkgo")
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts
index 68a237215bd1..52f74f22764d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ / {
chassis-type = "handset";
/* required for bootloader to select correct board */
- qcom,msm-id = <QCOM_ID_SM6125>;
- qcom,board-id = <22 0>;
+ qcom,msm-id = <QCOM_ID_SM6125 0x10000>;
+ qcom,board-id = <34 0>;
chosen {
#address-cells = <2>;
--
2.50.1
Konrad
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:33:46 +0800, Gabriel Gonzales wrote:
> This patchset introduces support for the Redmi Note 8 (codenamed ginkgo).
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Add missing cover letter
> - Fix up commit message for schema
> Changes in v3:
> - Use qcom ids instead of hardcoded msm-id (and other changes suggested by Konrad)
> - Switch up model properties and qcom properties position
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add Xiaomi Redmi Note 8
commit: 4ca8d6f898a85070934490071e429e97bc4e219b
[2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Initial support for xiaomi-ginkgo
commit: 9b1a6c925c88ed9331a2cae64fb3580e05345ded
Best regards,
--
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:33:46 +0800, Gabriel Gonzales wrote: > This patchset introduces support for the Redmi Note 8 (codenamed ginkgo). > > Changes in v2: > - Add missing cover letter > - Fix up commit message for schema > Changes in v3: > - Use qcom ids instead of hardcoded msm-id (and other changes suggested by Konrad) > - Switch up model properties and qcom properties position > > Gabriel Gonzales (2): > dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 > arm64: dts: qcom: sm6125: Initial support for xiaomi-ginkgo > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 1 + > .../boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts | 295 ++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 297 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dts > > -- > 2.48.1 > > > My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this series. Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply unless the platform maintainer has comments. If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then make sure dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/' for 20250311003353.8250-1-semfault@disroot.org: arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dtb: /: qcom,msm-id:0: [394] is too short from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/qcom.yaml# arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dtb: geniqup@4ac0000: #address-cells: 2 was expected from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/qcom/qcom,geni-se.yaml# arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dtb: geniqup@4ac0000: #size-cells: 2 was expected from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/qcom/qcom,geni-se.yaml# arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dtb: geniqup@4cc0000: #address-cells: 2 was expected from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/qcom/qcom,geni-se.yaml# arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125-xiaomi-ginkgo.dtb: geniqup@4cc0000: #size-cells: 2 was expected from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/qcom/qcom,geni-se.yaml#
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.