fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
kunit_kzalloc() may return a NULL pointer, dereferencing it without
NULL check may lead to NULL dereference.
Add a NULL check for test_state
Fixes: b7098e1fa7bc ("ext4: Add unit test for mb_free_blocks")
Fixes: ac96b56a2fbd ("ext4: Add unit test for mb_mark_used")
Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@inspur.com>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
index bb2a223b207c..d634c12f1984 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
@@ -796,6 +796,7 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buddy);
grp = kunit_kzalloc(test, offsetof(struct ext4_group_info,
bb_counters[MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)]), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, grp);
ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
@@ -860,6 +861,7 @@ static void test_mb_free_blocks(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buddy);
grp = kunit_kzalloc(test, offsetof(struct ext4_group_info,
bb_counters[MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)]), GFP_KERNEL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, grp);
ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
--
2.43.0
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 07:54:31PM +0800, Charles Han wrote: > kunit_kzalloc() may return a NULL pointer, dereferencing it without > NULL check may lead to NULL dereference. > Add a NULL check for test_state Thanks, others have submitted the same fix. It's now fixed in my tree and linux-next. - Ted
on 3/7/2025 7:54 PM, Charles Han wrote:
> kunit_kzalloc() may return a NULL pointer, dereferencing it without
> NULL check may lead to NULL dereference.
> Add a NULL check for test_state
>
> Fixes: b7098e1fa7bc ("ext4: Add unit test for mb_free_blocks")
> Fixes: ac96b56a2fbd ("ext4: Add unit test for mb_mark_used")
> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@inspur.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> index bb2a223b207c..d634c12f1984 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
> @@ -796,6 +796,7 @@ static void test_mb_mark_used(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buddy);
> grp = kunit_kzalloc(test, offsetof(struct ext4_group_info,
> bb_counters[MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)]), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, grp);
>
> ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> @@ -860,6 +861,7 @@ static void test_mb_free_blocks(struct kunit *test)
> KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buddy);
> grp = kunit_kzalloc(test, offsetof(struct ext4_group_info,
> bb_counters[MB_NUM_ORDERS(sb)]), GFP_KERNEL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, grp);
>
> ret = ext4_mb_load_buddy(sb, TEST_GOAL_GROUP, &e4b);
> KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
>
Good catch, looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.