[PATCH] clk: mmp: Fix NULL vs IS_ERR() check

Charles Han posted 1 patch 11 months, 1 week ago
drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa1908-apmu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[PATCH] clk: mmp: Fix NULL vs IS_ERR() check
Posted by Charles Han 11 months, 1 week ago
The devm_kzalloc() function returns NULL on error, not error pointers.
Fix the check.

Fixes: 03437e857b0a ("clk: mmp: Add Marvell PXA1908 APMU driver")
Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@inspur.com>
---
 drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa1908-apmu.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa1908-apmu.c b/drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa1908-apmu.c
index 8cfb1258202f..d3a070687fc5 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa1908-apmu.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa1908-apmu.c
@@ -87,8 +87,8 @@ static int pxa1908_apmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct pxa1908_clk_unit *pxa_unit;
 
 	pxa_unit = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pxa_unit), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (IS_ERR(pxa_unit))
-		return PTR_ERR(pxa_unit);
+	if (!pxa_unit)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	pxa_unit->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
 	if (IS_ERR(pxa_unit->base))
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH] clk: mmp: Fix NULL vs IS_ERR() check
Posted by Stephen Boyd 11 months, 1 week ago
Quoting Charles Han (2025-03-06 22:47:07)
> The devm_kzalloc() function returns NULL on error, not error pointers.
> Fix the check.
> 
> Fixes: 03437e857b0a ("clk: mmp: Add Marvell PXA1908 APMU driver")
> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@inspur.com>
> ---

Applied to clk-next
Re: [PATCH] clk: mmp: Fix NULL vs IS_ERR() check
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 11 months, 1 week ago
On 07/03/2025 07:47, Charles Han wrote:
> The devm_kzalloc() function returns NULL on error, not error pointers.
> Fix the check.
> 
> Fixes: 03437e857b0a ("clk: mmp: Add Marvell PXA1908 APMU driver")
> Signed-off-by: Charles Han <hanchunchao@inspur.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa1908-apmu.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

This one might be actually correct (in other cases you were blindly
copying some code like returning -ENOMEM while code expects NULL).

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof