[PATCH v2 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex

Juri Lelli posted 8 patches 11 months, 1 week ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v2 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex
Posted by Juri Lelli 11 months, 1 week ago
Create wrappers for sched_domains_mutex so that it can transparently be
used on both CONFIG_SMP and !CONFIG_SMP, as some function will need to
do.

Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Fixes: 53916d5fd3c0 ("sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow earlier for hotplug")
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
---
v1 -> v2: Remove wrappers for the !SMP case as all users are not defined
          either in that case
---
 include/linux/sched.h   |  2 ++
 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c  |  4 ++--
 kernel/sched/core.c     |  4 ++--
 kernel/sched/debug.c    |  8 ++++----
 kernel/sched/topology.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 9632e3318e0d..d5f8c161d852 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -383,6 +383,8 @@ enum uclamp_id {
 extern struct root_domain def_root_domain;
 extern struct mutex sched_domains_mutex;
 #endif
+extern void sched_domains_mutex_lock(void);
+extern void sched_domains_mutex_unlock(void);
 
 struct sched_param {
 	int sched_priority;
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
index 0f910c828973..f87526edb2a4 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
@@ -994,10 +994,10 @@ static void
 partition_and_rebuild_sched_domains(int ndoms_new, cpumask_var_t doms_new[],
 				    struct sched_domain_attr *dattr_new)
 {
-	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
+	sched_domains_mutex_lock();
 	partition_sched_domains_locked(ndoms_new, doms_new, dattr_new);
 	dl_rebuild_rd_accounting();
-	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
+	sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 67189907214d..58593f4d09a1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -8424,9 +8424,9 @@ void __init sched_init_smp(void)
 	 * CPU masks are stable and all blatant races in the below code cannot
 	 * happen.
 	 */
-	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
+	sched_domains_mutex_lock();
 	sched_init_domains(cpu_active_mask);
-	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
+	sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
 
 	/* Move init over to a non-isolated CPU */
 	if (set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN)) < 0)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index ef047add7f9e..a0893a483d35 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static ssize_t sched_verbose_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
 	bool orig;
 
 	cpus_read_lock();
-	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
+	sched_domains_mutex_lock();
 
 	orig = sched_debug_verbose;
 	result = debugfs_write_file_bool(filp, ubuf, cnt, ppos);
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static ssize_t sched_verbose_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
 		sd_dentry = NULL;
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
+	sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
 	cpus_read_unlock();
 
 	return result;
@@ -515,9 +515,9 @@ static __init int sched_init_debug(void)
 	debugfs_create_u32("migration_cost_ns", 0644, debugfs_sched, &sysctl_sched_migration_cost);
 	debugfs_create_u32("nr_migrate", 0644, debugfs_sched, &sysctl_sched_nr_migrate);
 
-	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
+	sched_domains_mutex_lock();
 	update_sched_domain_debugfs();
-	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
+	sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index c49aea8c1025..296ff2acfd32 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -6,6 +6,14 @@
 #include <linux/bsearch.h>
 
 DEFINE_MUTEX(sched_domains_mutex);
+void sched_domains_mutex_lock(void)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
+}
+void sched_domains_mutex_unlock(void)
+{
+	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
+}
 
 /* Protected by sched_domains_mutex: */
 static cpumask_var_t sched_domains_tmpmask;
@@ -2791,7 +2799,7 @@ void partition_sched_domains_locked(int ndoms_new, cpumask_var_t doms_new[],
 void partition_sched_domains(int ndoms_new, cpumask_var_t doms_new[],
 			     struct sched_domain_attr *dattr_new)
 {
-	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
+	sched_domains_mutex_lock();
 	partition_sched_domains_locked(ndoms_new, doms_new, dattr_new);
-	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
+	sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
 }
-- 
2.48.1
Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex
Posted by Waiman Long 11 months, 1 week ago
On 3/6/25 9:10 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Create wrappers for sched_domains_mutex so that it can transparently be
> used on both CONFIG_SMP and !CONFIG_SMP, as some function will need to
> do.
>
> Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> Fixes: 53916d5fd3c0 ("sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow earlier for hotplug")
> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2: Remove wrappers for the !SMP case as all users are not defined
>            either in that case
> ---
>   include/linux/sched.h   |  2 ++
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c  |  4 ++--
>   kernel/sched/core.c     |  4 ++--
>   kernel/sched/debug.c    |  8 ++++----
>   kernel/sched/topology.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>   5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 9632e3318e0d..d5f8c161d852 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -383,6 +383,8 @@ enum uclamp_id {
>   extern struct root_domain def_root_domain;
>   extern struct mutex sched_domains_mutex;
>   #endif
> +extern void sched_domains_mutex_lock(void);
> +extern void sched_domains_mutex_unlock(void);

As discussed in the other thread, move the 
sched_domains_mutex_{lock/unlock}{} inside the "#if CONFIG_SMP" block 
and define the else part so that it can be used in code block that will 
also be compiled in the !CONFIG_SMP case.

Other than that, the rest looks good to me.

Cheers,
Longman
Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex
Posted by Waiman Long 11 months, 1 week ago
On 3/7/25 10:11 AM, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 3/6/25 9:10 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>> Create wrappers for sched_domains_mutex so that it can transparently be
>> used on both CONFIG_SMP and !CONFIG_SMP, as some function will need to
>> do.
>>
>> Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>> Fixes: 53916d5fd3c0 ("sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow 
>> earlier for hotplug")
>> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> v1 -> v2: Remove wrappers for the !SMP case as all users are not defined
>>            either in that case
>> ---
>>   include/linux/sched.h   |  2 ++
>>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c  |  4 ++--
>>   kernel/sched/core.c     |  4 ++--
>>   kernel/sched/debug.c    |  8 ++++----
>>   kernel/sched/topology.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>   5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
>> index 9632e3318e0d..d5f8c161d852 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
>> @@ -383,6 +383,8 @@ enum uclamp_id {
>>   extern struct root_domain def_root_domain;
>>   extern struct mutex sched_domains_mutex;
>>   #endif
>> +extern void sched_domains_mutex_lock(void);
>> +extern void sched_domains_mutex_unlock(void);
>
> As discussed in the other thread, move the 
> sched_domains_mutex_{lock/unlock}{} inside the "#if CONFIG_SMP" block 
> and define the else part so that it can be used in code block that 
> will also be compiled in the !CONFIG_SMP case.
>
> Other than that, the rest looks good to me.

Actually, you can also remove sched_domains_mutex from the header and 
make it static as it is no longer directly accessed.

Cheers,
Longman

Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex
Posted by Juri Lelli 11 months, 1 week ago
On 07/03/25 10:19, Waiman Long wrote:
> 
> On 3/7/25 10:11 AM, Waiman Long wrote:
> > On 3/6/25 9:10 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > > Create wrappers for sched_domains_mutex so that it can transparently be
> > > used on both CONFIG_SMP and !CONFIG_SMP, as some function will need to
> > > do.
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> > > Fixes: 53916d5fd3c0 ("sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow
> > > earlier for hotplug")
> > > Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > v1 -> v2: Remove wrappers for the !SMP case as all users are not defined
> > >            either in that case
> > > ---
> > >   include/linux/sched.h   |  2 ++
> > >   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c  |  4 ++--
> > >   kernel/sched/core.c     |  4 ++--
> > >   kernel/sched/debug.c    |  8 ++++----
> > >   kernel/sched/topology.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> > >   5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > index 9632e3318e0d..d5f8c161d852 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > @@ -383,6 +383,8 @@ enum uclamp_id {
> > >   extern struct root_domain def_root_domain;
> > >   extern struct mutex sched_domains_mutex;
> > >   #endif
> > > +extern void sched_domains_mutex_lock(void);
> > > +extern void sched_domains_mutex_unlock(void);
> > 
> > As discussed in the other thread, move the
> > sched_domains_mutex_{lock/unlock}{} inside the "#if CONFIG_SMP" block
> > and define the else part so that it can be used in code block that will
> > also be compiled in the !CONFIG_SMP case.
> > 
> > Other than that, the rest looks good to me.
> 
> Actually, you can also remove sched_domains_mutex from the header and make
> it static as it is no longer directly accessed.

Apart from a lockdep_assert_held() in cpuset.c, no? Guess I can create a
wrapper for that, but is it really better?

Thanks,
Juri
Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex
Posted by Waiman Long 11 months, 1 week ago
On 3/7/25 10:59 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 07/03/25 10:19, Waiman Long wrote:
>> On 3/7/25 10:11 AM, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> On 3/6/25 9:10 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
>>>> Create wrappers for sched_domains_mutex so that it can transparently be
>>>> used on both CONFIG_SMP and !CONFIG_SMP, as some function will need to
>>>> do.
>>>>
>>>> Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>>>> Fixes: 53916d5fd3c0 ("sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow
>>>> earlier for hotplug")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v1 -> v2: Remove wrappers for the !SMP case as all users are not defined
>>>>             either in that case
>>>> ---
>>>>    include/linux/sched.h   |  2 ++
>>>>    kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c  |  4 ++--
>>>>    kernel/sched/core.c     |  4 ++--
>>>>    kernel/sched/debug.c    |  8 ++++----
>>>>    kernel/sched/topology.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>>>    5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
>>>> index 9632e3318e0d..d5f8c161d852 100644
>>>> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
>>>> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
>>>> @@ -383,6 +383,8 @@ enum uclamp_id {
>>>>    extern struct root_domain def_root_domain;
>>>>    extern struct mutex sched_domains_mutex;
>>>>    #endif
>>>> +extern void sched_domains_mutex_lock(void);
>>>> +extern void sched_domains_mutex_unlock(void);
>>> As discussed in the other thread, move the
>>> sched_domains_mutex_{lock/unlock}{} inside the "#if CONFIG_SMP" block
>>> and define the else part so that it can be used in code block that will
>>> also be compiled in the !CONFIG_SMP case.
>>>
>>> Other than that, the rest looks good to me.
>> Actually, you can also remove sched_domains_mutex from the header and make
>> it static as it is no longer directly accessed.
> Apart from a lockdep_assert_held() in cpuset.c, no? Guess I can create a
> wrapper for that, but is it really better?

I forgot about that. Please ignore this comment.

Thanks,
Longman

Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex
Posted by Juri Lelli 11 months, 1 week ago
On 07/03/25 10:11, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 3/6/25 9:10 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Create wrappers for sched_domains_mutex so that it can transparently be
> > used on both CONFIG_SMP and !CONFIG_SMP, as some function will need to
> > do.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> > Fixes: 53916d5fd3c0 ("sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow earlier for hotplug")
> > Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > v1 -> v2: Remove wrappers for the !SMP case as all users are not defined
> >            either in that case
> > ---
> >   include/linux/sched.h   |  2 ++
> >   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c  |  4 ++--
> >   kernel/sched/core.c     |  4 ++--
> >   kernel/sched/debug.c    |  8 ++++----
> >   kernel/sched/topology.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> >   5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index 9632e3318e0d..d5f8c161d852 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -383,6 +383,8 @@ enum uclamp_id {
> >   extern struct root_domain def_root_domain;
> >   extern struct mutex sched_domains_mutex;
> >   #endif
> > +extern void sched_domains_mutex_lock(void);
> > +extern void sched_domains_mutex_unlock(void);
> 
> As discussed in the other thread, move the
> sched_domains_mutex_{lock/unlock}{} inside the "#if CONFIG_SMP" block and
> define the else part so that it can be used in code block that will also be
> compiled in the !CONFIG_SMP case.

Ack. 

> Other than that, the rest looks good to me.

Thanks! I will be sending out a v3 early next week (waiting a few more
hours in case anyone spots something else that needs rework).

Best,
Juri
Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex
Posted by Shrikanth Hegde 11 months, 1 week ago
Hi Juri.

On 3/6/25 19:40, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Create wrappers for sched_domains_mutex so that it can transparently be
> used on both CONFIG_SMP and !CONFIG_SMP, as some function will need to
> do.
> 
> Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
> Fixes: 53916d5fd3c0 ("sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow earlier for hotplug")
> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2: Remove wrappers for the !SMP case as all users are not defined
>            either in that case
> ---
>   include/linux/sched.h   |  2 ++
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c  |  4 ++--
>   kernel/sched/core.c     |  4 ++--
>   kernel/sched/debug.c    |  8 ++++----
>   kernel/sched/topology.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>   5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 9632e3318e0d..d5f8c161d852 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -383,6 +383,8 @@ enum uclamp_id {
>   extern struct root_domain def_root_domain;
>   extern struct mutex sched_domains_mutex;
>   #endif
> +extern void sched_domains_mutex_lock(void);
> +extern void sched_domains_mutex_unlock(void);
>   
>   struct sched_param {
>   	int sched_priority;
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 0f910c828973..f87526edb2a4 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -994,10 +994,10 @@ static void
>   partition_and_rebuild_sched_domains(int ndoms_new, cpumask_var_t doms_new[],
>   				    struct sched_domain_attr *dattr_new)
>   {
> -	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_lock();
>   	partition_sched_domains_locked(ndoms_new, doms_new, dattr_new);
>   	dl_rebuild_rd_accounting();
> -	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
>   }
>   
>   /*
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 67189907214d..58593f4d09a1 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -8424,9 +8424,9 @@ void __init sched_init_smp(void)
>   	 * CPU masks are stable and all blatant races in the below code cannot
>   	 * happen.
>   	 */
> -	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_lock();
>   	sched_init_domains(cpu_active_mask);
> -	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
>   
>   	/* Move init over to a non-isolated CPU */
>   	if (set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN)) < 0)
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> index ef047add7f9e..a0893a483d35 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static ssize_t sched_verbose_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
>   	bool orig;
>   
>   	cpus_read_lock();
> -	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_lock();
>   
>   	orig = sched_debug_verbose;
>   	result = debugfs_write_file_bool(filp, ubuf, cnt, ppos);
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static ssize_t sched_verbose_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
>   		sd_dentry = NULL;
>   	}
>   
> -	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
>   	cpus_read_unlock();
>   
>   	return result;
> @@ -515,9 +515,9 @@ static __init int sched_init_debug(void)
>   	debugfs_create_u32("migration_cost_ns", 0644, debugfs_sched, &sysctl_sched_migration_cost);
>   	debugfs_create_u32("nr_migrate", 0644, debugfs_sched, &sysctl_sched_nr_migrate);
>   
> -	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_lock();
>   	update_sched_domain_debugfs();
> -	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
>   #endif
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index c49aea8c1025..296ff2acfd32 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,14 @@
>   #include <linux/bsearch.h>
>   
>   DEFINE_MUTEX(sched_domains_mutex);
> +void sched_domains_mutex_lock(void)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +}
> +void sched_domains_mutex_unlock(void)
> +{
> +	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +}
>   
>   /* Protected by sched_domains_mutex: */
>   static cpumask_var_t sched_domains_tmpmask;
> @@ -2791,7 +2799,7 @@ void partition_sched_domains_locked(int ndoms_new, cpumask_var_t doms_new[],
>   void partition_sched_domains(int ndoms_new, cpumask_var_t doms_new[],
>   			     struct sched_domain_attr *dattr_new)
>   {
> -	mutex_lock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_lock();
>   	partition_sched_domains_locked(ndoms_new, doms_new, dattr_new);
> -	mutex_unlock(&sched_domains_mutex);
> +	sched_domains_mutex_unlock();
>   }

Maybe sched_domains_mutex can be static since its only used in topology.c ?

Other than the above
Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex
Posted by Juri Lelli 11 months, 1 week ago
Hi,

Thanks for the overall review!

On 07/03/25 12:04, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> Hi Juri.
> 
> On 3/6/25 19:40, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Create wrappers for sched_domains_mutex so that it can transparently be
> > used on both CONFIG_SMP and !CONFIG_SMP, as some function will need to
> > do.

...

> Maybe sched_domains_mutex can be static since its only used in topology.c ?

We have a lockdep_assert in cpuset.c, don't we? We can create another
wrapper for that, but I am not sure it is going to be cleaner.

Thanks,
Juri
Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex
Posted by Shrikanth Hegde 11 months, 1 week ago

On 3/7/25 14:23, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for the overall review!
> 
> On 07/03/25 12:04, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
>> Hi Juri.
>>
>> On 3/6/25 19:40, Juri Lelli wrote:
>>> Create wrappers for sched_domains_mutex so that it can transparently be
>>> used on both CONFIG_SMP and !CONFIG_SMP, as some function will need to
>>> do.
> 
> ...
> 
>> Maybe sched_domains_mutex can be static since its only used in topology.c ?
> 
> We have a lockdep_assert in cpuset.c, don't we? We can create another
> wrapper for that, but I am not sure it is going to be cleaner.

Ok. Sorry, my bad. I searched only in kernel/sched. You can ignore this 
comment.

> 
> Thanks,
> Juri
>