drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
To wake up the system from s2idle when pressing the power-button, let's
convert from using pm_wakeup_event() to pm_wakeup_dev_event(), as it allows
us to specify the "hard" in-parameter, which needs to be set for s2idle.
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
---
drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c b/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c
index d3c293a95d32..d315017324d9 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static irqreturn_t hi65xx_power_press_isr(int irq, void *q)
{
struct input_dev *input = q;
- pm_wakeup_event(input->dev.parent, MAX_HELD_TIME);
+ pm_wakeup_dev_event(input->dev.parent, MAX_HELD_TIME, true);
input_report_key(input, KEY_POWER, 1);
input_sync(input);
--
2.43.0
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:50:21PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > To wake up the system from s2idle when pressing the power-button, let's > convert from using pm_wakeup_event() to pm_wakeup_dev_event(), as it allows > us to specify the "hard" in-parameter, which needs to be set for s2idle. > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Applied, thank you. -- Dmitry
Hi Ulf,
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:50:21PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> To wake up the system from s2idle when pressing the power-button, let's
> convert from using pm_wakeup_event() to pm_wakeup_dev_event(), as it allows
> us to specify the "hard" in-parameter, which needs to be set for s2idle.
I was looking at pm_wakeup_event() and pm_wakeup_dev_event() and I am
afraid I do not understand the distinction. Why would we want to
abort suspend by only by some wakeup sources and not by others? And why
does a driver need to know whether a system uses s2idle or some other
implementation of low power state?
FWIW we have Chromebooks that use S0ix and Chromebooks that use S3 as
well as ARM Chromebooks and I do not think they use
pm_wakeup_dev_event() variant.
I'm cc-ing Rafael to give us some guidance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c b/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c
> index d3c293a95d32..d315017324d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static irqreturn_t hi65xx_power_press_isr(int irq, void *q)
> {
> struct input_dev *input = q;
>
> - pm_wakeup_event(input->dev.parent, MAX_HELD_TIME);
> + pm_wakeup_dev_event(input->dev.parent, MAX_HELD_TIME, true);
> input_report_key(input, KEY_POWER, 1);
> input_sync(input);
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 06:09, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:50:21PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > To wake up the system from s2idle when pressing the power-button, let's
> > convert from using pm_wakeup_event() to pm_wakeup_dev_event(), as it allows
> > us to specify the "hard" in-parameter, which needs to be set for s2idle.
>
> I was looking at pm_wakeup_event() and pm_wakeup_dev_event() and I am
> afraid I do not understand the distinction. Why would we want to
> abort suspend by only by some wakeup sources and not by others? And why
> does a driver need to know whether a system uses s2idle or some other
> implementation of low power state?
Good question!
In regards to waking up. The CPU that wakes up from suspend-to-idle
may actually decide to just go back to idle, without doing a full
system resume - unless there is a wakeup that requires the system to
resume.
In suspend-to-ram a wakeup will always trigger a full system resume.
In most cases a driver doesn't really need to distinguish between
these cases, yet the wakeup APIs are designed to allow it. That's the
reason why pm_system_wakeup() needs to be called (controlled by "hard"
in-parameter to pm_wakeup_dev_event()).
>
> FWIW we have Chromebooks that use S0ix and Chromebooks that use S3 as
> well as ARM Chromebooks and I do not think they use
> pm_wakeup_dev_event() variant.
>
> I'm cc-ing Rafael to give us some guidance.
Good, let's see if there is something I failed to explain.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c b/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c
> > index d3c293a95d32..d315017324d9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c
> > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static irqreturn_t hi65xx_power_press_isr(int irq, void *q)
> > {
> > struct input_dev *input = q;
> >
> > - pm_wakeup_event(input->dev.parent, MAX_HELD_TIME);
> > + pm_wakeup_dev_event(input->dev.parent, MAX_HELD_TIME, true);
> > input_report_key(input, KEY_POWER, 1);
> > input_sync(input);
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Dmitry
Kind regards
Uffe
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 at 17:37, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 at 06:09, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ulf,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:50:21PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > > To wake up the system from s2idle when pressing the power-button, let's
> > > convert from using pm_wakeup_event() to pm_wakeup_dev_event(), as it allows
> > > us to specify the "hard" in-parameter, which needs to be set for s2idle.
> >
> > I was looking at pm_wakeup_event() and pm_wakeup_dev_event() and I am
> > afraid I do not understand the distinction. Why would we want to
> > abort suspend by only by some wakeup sources and not by others? And why
> > does a driver need to know whether a system uses s2idle or some other
> > implementation of low power state?
>
> Good question!
>
> In regards to waking up. The CPU that wakes up from suspend-to-idle
> may actually decide to just go back to idle, without doing a full
> system resume - unless there is a wakeup that requires the system to
> resume.
>
> In suspend-to-ram a wakeup will always trigger a full system resume.
>
> In most cases a driver doesn't really need to distinguish between
> these cases, yet the wakeup APIs are designed to allow it. That's the
> reason why pm_system_wakeup() needs to be called (controlled by "hard"
> in-parameter to pm_wakeup_dev_event()).
>
> >
> > FWIW we have Chromebooks that use S0ix and Chromebooks that use S3 as
> > well as ARM Chromebooks and I do not think they use
> > pm_wakeup_dev_event() variant.
> >
> > I'm cc-ing Rafael to give us some guidance.
>
> Good, let's see if there is something I failed to explain.
>
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c b/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c
> > > index d3c293a95d32..d315017324d9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/hisi_powerkey.c
> > > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static irqreturn_t hi65xx_power_press_isr(int irq, void *q)
> > > {
> > > struct input_dev *input = q;
> > >
> > > - pm_wakeup_event(input->dev.parent, MAX_HELD_TIME);
> > > + pm_wakeup_dev_event(input->dev.parent, MAX_HELD_TIME, true);
> > > input_report_key(input, KEY_POWER, 1);
> > > input_sync(input);
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.43.0
> > >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Dmitry
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
Dmitry, is there anything else I can do to make you queue this one?
S2idle is currently broken for Hikey and - it's rather annoying.
Kind regards
Uffe
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.