.../test.d/dynevent/add_remove_fprobe.tc | 18 +++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
The fprobe test fails on Fedora 41 since the fprobe test assumption that
the number of enabled_functions is zero before the test starts is not
necessarily true. Some user space tools, like systemd, add BPF programs
that attach to functions. Those will show up in the enabled_functions table
and must be taken into account by the fprobe test.
Therefore count the number of lines of enabled_functions before tests
start, and use that as base when comparing expected results.
Fixes: e85c5e9792b9 ("selftests/ftrace: Update fprobe test to check enabled_functions file")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
.../test.d/dynevent/add_remove_fprobe.tc | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/dynevent/add_remove_fprobe.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/dynevent/add_remove_fprobe.tc
index 449f9d8be746..73f6c6fcecab 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/dynevent/add_remove_fprobe.tc
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/dynevent/add_remove_fprobe.tc
@@ -10,12 +10,16 @@ PLACE=$FUNCTION_FORK
PLACE2="kmem_cache_free"
PLACE3="schedule_timeout"
+# Some functions may have BPF programs attached, therefore
+# count already enabled_functions before tests start
+ocnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
+
echo "f:myevent1 $PLACE" >> dynamic_events
# Make sure the event is attached and is the only one
grep -q $PLACE enabled_functions
cnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
-if [ $cnt -ne 1 ]; then
+if [ $cnt -ne $((ocnt + 1)) ]; then
exit_fail
fi
@@ -23,7 +27,7 @@ echo "f:myevent2 $PLACE%return" >> dynamic_events
# It should till be the only attached function
cnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
-if [ $cnt -ne 1 ]; then
+if [ $cnt -ne $((ocnt + 1)) ]; then
exit_fail
fi
@@ -32,7 +36,7 @@ echo "f:myevent3 $PLACE2" >> dynamic_events
grep -q $PLACE2 enabled_functions
cnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
-if [ $cnt -ne 2 ]; then
+if [ $cnt -ne $((ocnt + 2)) ]; then
exit_fail
fi
@@ -49,7 +53,7 @@ grep -q myevent1 dynamic_events
# should still have 2 left
cnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
-if [ $cnt -ne 2 ]; then
+if [ $cnt -ne $((ocnt + 2)) ]; then
exit_fail
fi
@@ -57,7 +61,7 @@ echo > dynamic_events
# Should have none left
cnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
-if [ $cnt -ne 0 ]; then
+if [ $cnt -ne $ocnt ]; then
exit_fail
fi
@@ -65,7 +69,7 @@ echo "f:myevent4 $PLACE" >> dynamic_events
# Should only have one enabled
cnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
-if [ $cnt -ne 1 ]; then
+if [ $cnt -ne $((ocnt + 1)) ]; then
exit_fail
fi
@@ -73,7 +77,7 @@ echo > dynamic_events
# Should have none left
cnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
-if [ $cnt -ne 0 ]; then
+if [ $cnt -ne $ocnt ]; then
exit_fail
fi
--
2.45.2
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:27:03 +0100
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> The fprobe test fails on Fedora 41 since the fprobe test assumption that
> the number of enabled_functions is zero before the test starts is not
> necessarily true. Some user space tools, like systemd, add BPF programs
> that attach to functions. Those will show up in the enabled_functions table
> and must be taken into account by the fprobe test.
Hmm, this ftrace selftests has been expected to be run without
any BPF programs... Is there any other issue on other test cases?
Anyway, this looks good to me.
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Thank you!
>
> Therefore count the number of lines of enabled_functions before tests
> start, and use that as base when comparing expected results.
>
> Fixes: e85c5e9792b9 ("selftests/ftrace: Update fprobe test to check enabled_functions file")
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> .../test.d/dynevent/add_remove_fprobe.tc | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/dynevent/add_remove_fprobe.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/dynevent/add_remove_fprobe.tc
> index 449f9d8be746..73f6c6fcecab 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/dynevent/add_remove_fprobe.tc
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/dynevent/add_remove_fprobe.tc
> @@ -10,12 +10,16 @@ PLACE=$FUNCTION_FORK
> PLACE2="kmem_cache_free"
> PLACE3="schedule_timeout"
>
> +# Some functions may have BPF programs attached, therefore
> +# count already enabled_functions before tests start
> +ocnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
> +
> echo "f:myevent1 $PLACE" >> dynamic_events
>
> # Make sure the event is attached and is the only one
> grep -q $PLACE enabled_functions
> cnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
> -if [ $cnt -ne 1 ]; then
> +if [ $cnt -ne $((ocnt + 1)) ]; then
> exit_fail
> fi
>
> @@ -23,7 +27,7 @@ echo "f:myevent2 $PLACE%return" >> dynamic_events
>
> # It should till be the only attached function
> cnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
> -if [ $cnt -ne 1 ]; then
> +if [ $cnt -ne $((ocnt + 1)) ]; then
> exit_fail
> fi
>
> @@ -32,7 +36,7 @@ echo "f:myevent3 $PLACE2" >> dynamic_events
>
> grep -q $PLACE2 enabled_functions
> cnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
> -if [ $cnt -ne 2 ]; then
> +if [ $cnt -ne $((ocnt + 2)) ]; then
> exit_fail
> fi
>
> @@ -49,7 +53,7 @@ grep -q myevent1 dynamic_events
>
> # should still have 2 left
> cnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
> -if [ $cnt -ne 2 ]; then
> +if [ $cnt -ne $((ocnt + 2)) ]; then
> exit_fail
> fi
>
> @@ -57,7 +61,7 @@ echo > dynamic_events
>
> # Should have none left
> cnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
> -if [ $cnt -ne 0 ]; then
> +if [ $cnt -ne $ocnt ]; then
> exit_fail
> fi
>
> @@ -65,7 +69,7 @@ echo "f:myevent4 $PLACE" >> dynamic_events
>
> # Should only have one enabled
> cnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
> -if [ $cnt -ne 1 ]; then
> +if [ $cnt -ne $((ocnt + 1)) ]; then
> exit_fail
> fi
>
> @@ -73,7 +77,7 @@ echo > dynamic_events
>
> # Should have none left
> cnt=`cat enabled_functions | wc -l`
> -if [ $cnt -ne 0 ]; then
> +if [ $cnt -ne $ocnt ]; then
> exit_fail
> fi
>
> --
> 2.45.2
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 23:54:47 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > Hmm, this ftrace selftests has been expected to be run without > any BPF programs... Is there any other issue on other test cases? Unfortunately, systemd is starting to add BPF programs :-p I noticed that my laptop has users. -- Steve
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:13:00 -0500 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 23:54:47 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > > > Hmm, this ftrace selftests has been expected to be run without > > any BPF programs... Is there any other issue on other test cases? > > Unfortunately, systemd is starting to add BPF programs :-p > > I noticed that my laptop has users. Ah, I might need systemd-busybox to build minimum test environment :-( Thanks, > > -- Steve -- Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:54:47PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 15:27:03 +0100 > Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > The fprobe test fails on Fedora 41 since the fprobe test assumption that > > the number of enabled_functions is zero before the test starts is not > > necessarily true. Some user space tools, like systemd, add BPF programs > > that attach to functions. Those will show up in the enabled_functions table > > and must be taken into account by the fprobe test. > > Hmm, this ftrace selftests has been expected to be run without > any BPF programs... Is there any other issue on other test cases? At least on s390 all tests pass now. That is of course except for the "add/remove/test uprobe events" test where I sent a patch. Not sure what will happen with that one: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250220130102.2079179-1-hca@linux.ibm.com/
On Wed, 26 Feb 2025 16:28:35 +0100 Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > That is of course except for the "add/remove/test uprobe events" test > where I sent a patch. Not sure what will happen with that one: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250220130102.2079179-1-hca@linux.ibm.com/ Shuah's kernel.org emails seem to be bouncing. I'll try her Linux Foundation one for that. -- Steve
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.