drivers/rtc/rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Building with W=1 shows a warning about ftm_imx_acpi_ids being unused when
CONFIG_ACPI is disabled:
drivers/rtc/rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.c:312:36: error: unused variable 'ftm_imx_acpi_ids' [-Werror,-Wunused-const-variable]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.c
index a72c4ad0cec6..12da7d36e520 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static struct platform_driver ftm_rtc_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "ftm-alarm",
.of_match_table = ftm_rtc_match,
- .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(ftm_imx_acpi_ids),
+ .acpi_match_table = ftm_imx_acpi_ids,
},
};
--
2.39.5
On 25/02/2025 17:34, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > Building with W=1 shows a warning about ftm_imx_acpi_ids being unused when > CONFIG_ACPI is disabled: > > drivers/rtc/rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.c:312:36: error: unused variable 'ftm_imx_acpi_ids' [-Werror,-Wunused-const-variable] > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> I already sent a fix for this few days ago: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250222114146.162835-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/ Best regards, Krzysztof
On 25/02/2025 18:12:10+0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 25/02/2025 17:34, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > > > Building with W=1 shows a warning about ftm_imx_acpi_ids being unused when > > CONFIG_ACPI is disabled: > > > > drivers/rtc/rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.c:312:36: error: unused variable 'ftm_imx_acpi_ids' [-Werror,-Wunused-const-variable] > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > I already sent a fix for this few days ago: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250222114146.162835-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/ > But wouldn't Arnd's one be better? -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
On 25/02/2025 18:16, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 25/02/2025 18:12:10+0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 25/02/2025 17:34, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >>> >>> Building with W=1 shows a warning about ftm_imx_acpi_ids being unused when >>> CONFIG_ACPI is disabled: >>> >>> drivers/rtc/rtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.c:312:36: error: unused variable 'ftm_imx_acpi_ids' [-Werror,-Wunused-const-variable] >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> >> I already sent a fix for this few days ago: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250222114146.162835-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org/ >> > > But wouldn't Arnd's one be better? ACPI table can be here entirely dropped and driver will match via PRP0001, so I think ACPI_PTR makes sense. But if you have arguments for keeping both, sure... There was no response to my trivial patch and multiple people will be wasting same time on the same issue. So just apply whichever of these, before third person wastes more time on that warning. Best regards, Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.