[PATCH v4 0/3] Add EINT support for multiple addresses

Hao Chang posted 3 patches 11 months, 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c           | 246 ++++++++++-----
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.h           |  21 +-
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8196.c     |   1 +
.../pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c  |  49 ++-
.../pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h  |   1 +
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-mt8196.h | 296 ++++++++++++++++++
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.h      |   7 +
7 files changed, 518 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
[PATCH v4 0/3] Add EINT support for multiple addresses
Posted by Hao Chang 11 months, 2 weeks ago
v4 changes:
1)Add err statement for exception handling
2)Add check for invalid pins
3)Use defined eint pins

v3 changes:
1)Add error judgment

v2 changes:
1)Remove instance structure
2)Modify the way to obtain eint address

---
This patch depends on
[v3,2/2] pinctrl: mediatek: add mt8196 driver
[v3,1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek: add support for mt8196

Please also accept this patch together with [1]
to avoid build and dt binding check error.
[1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=&submitter=215008&state=&q=v3&archive=&delegate=
---
Hao Chang (3):
  pinctrl: mediatek: add eint pins
  inctrl: mediatek: modify the method of obtaining eint address
  pinctrl: mediatek: adapt to EINT multi-segment addresses

 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c           | 246 ++++++++++-----
 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.h           |  21 +-
 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt8196.c     |   1 +
 .../pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c  |  49 ++-
 .../pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h  |   1 +
 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-mt8196.h | 296 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.h      |   7 +
 7 files changed, 518 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)

-- 
2.46.0
Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add EINT support for multiple addresses
Posted by Linus Walleij 11 months ago
Hi Hao,

thanks for your patches!

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 3:07 PM Hao Chang <ot_chhao.chang@mediatek.com> wrote:

> This patch depends on
> [v3,2/2] pinctrl: mediatek: add mt8196 driver
> [v3,1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek: add support for mt8196
>
> Please also accept this patch together with [1]
> to avoid build and dt binding check error.
> [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=&submitter=215008&state=&q=v3&archive=&delegate=

Since the dependence series is not finished I can't apply these
patches either, do you want to send an independent version of these
patches so we merge them *first* since they seem finished?

Then the mt8196 series can rebase on your patches in v6.15-rc1
instead.

Just send a version based on v6.14-rc1 and I will apply it.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add EINT support for multiple addresses
Posted by Chhao Chang (常浩) 10 months, 3 weeks ago
On Fri, 2025-03-14 at 10:58 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> 
> 
> Hi Hao,
> 
> thanks for your patches!
> 
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 3:07 PM Hao Chang <
> ot_chhao.chang@mediatek.com> wrote:
> 
> > This patch depends on
> > [v3,2/2] pinctrl: mediatek: add mt8196 driver
> > [v3,1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek: add support for mt8196
> > 
> > Please also accept this patch together with [1]
> > to avoid build and dt binding check error.
> > [1]
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=&submitter=215008&state=&q=v3&archive=&delegate=__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!gUMnwvZLiv7PLfBynupfezUYGOwSWFXcCubh-tJn4vobCnaiSRRXRgakWcQBdoQ8s0VNcBoQUpuFFhlLgtJb-OArDwfJKcQ$
> 
> Since the dependence series is not finished I can't apply these
> patches either, do you want to send an independent version of these
> patches so we merge them *first* since they seem finished?
> 
> Then the mt8196 series can rebase on your patches in v6.15-rc1
> instead.
> 
> Just send a version based on v6.14-rc1 and I will apply it.

Thanks for your suggestion, I will fix this.

> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij