The Nuvoton NCT6694 is a peripheral expander with 16 GPIO chips,
6 I2C controllers, 2 CANfd controllers, 2 Watchdog timers, ADC,
PWM, and RTC.
This driver implements USB device functionality and shares the
chip's peripherals as a child device.
Each child device can use the USB functions nct6694_read_msg()
and nct6694_write_msg() to issue a command. They can also request
interrupt that will be called when the USB device receives its
interrupt pipe.
Signed-off-by: Ming Yu <a0282524688@gmail.com>
---
MAINTAINERS | 7 +
drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 18 ++
drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/mfd/nct6694.c | 378 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h | 102 ++++++++++
5 files changed, 507 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/nct6694.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 873aa2cce4d7..c700a0b96960 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -16918,6 +16918,13 @@ F: drivers/nubus/
F: include/linux/nubus.h
F: include/uapi/linux/nubus.h
+NUVOTON NCT6694 MFD DRIVER
+M: Ming Yu <tmyu0@nuvoton.com>
+L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+S: Supported
+F: drivers/mfd/nct6694.c
+F: include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h
+
NVIDIA (rivafb and nvidiafb) FRAMEBUFFER DRIVER
M: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>
L: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
index 6b0682af6e32..c97a2bdcea0b 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
@@ -1045,6 +1045,24 @@ config MFD_MENF21BMC
This driver can also be built as a module. If so the module
will be called menf21bmc.
+config MFD_NCT6694
+ tristate "Nuvoton NCT6694 support"
+ select MFD_CORE
+ depends on USB
+ help
+ This enables support for the Nuvoton USB device NCT6694, which shares
+ peripherals.
+
+ This driver provides core APIs to access the NCT6694 hardware
+ monitoring and control features.
+
+ The NCT6694 is a versatile multi-function device that supports
+ functionalities such as GPIO, I2C, CAN, WDT, HWMON, and RTC
+ management.
+
+ Additional drivers must be enabled to utilize the specific
+ functionalities of the device.
+
config MFD_OCELOT
tristate "Microsemi Ocelot External Control Support"
depends on SPI_MASTER
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
index 9220eaf7cf12..7725b732e265 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
@@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MC13XXX) += mc13xxx-core.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MC13XXX_SPI) += mc13xxx-spi.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MC13XXX_I2C) += mc13xxx-i2c.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_NCT6694) += nct6694.o
+
obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_CORE) += mfd-core.o
ocelot-soc-objs := ocelot-core.o ocelot-spi.o
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/nct6694.c b/drivers/mfd/nct6694.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c82457679ca6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/mfd/nct6694.c
@@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Nuvoton NCT6694 core driver using USB interface to provide
+ * access to the NCT6694 hardware monitoring and control features.
+ *
+ * The NCT6694 is a versatile multi-function device that supports
+ * functionalities such as GPIO, I2C, CAN, WDT, HWMON and RTC
+ * management.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Nuvoton Technology Corp.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bits.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/nct6694.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/usb.h>
+
+static const struct mfd_cell nct6694_dev[] = {
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x0),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x2),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x3),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x4),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x5),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x6),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x7),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x8),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x9),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xA),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xB),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xC),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xD),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xE),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xF),
+
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x0),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x2),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x3),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x4),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x5),
+
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_canfd", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x0),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_canfd", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
+
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_wdt", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x0),
+ MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_wdt", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
+
+ MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-hwmon"),
+ MFD_CELL_NAME("rtc-nct6694"),
+};
+
+static int nct6694_response_err_handling(struct nct6694 *nct6694,
+ unsigned char err_status)
+{
+ switch (err_status) {
+ case NCT6694_NO_ERROR:
+ return err_status;
+ case NCT6694_NOT_SUPPORT_ERROR:
+ dev_warn(nct6694->dev, "Command is not supported!\n");
+ break;
+ case NCT6694_NO_RESPONSE_ERROR:
+ dev_warn(nct6694->dev, "Command received no response!\n");
+ break;
+ case NCT6694_TIMEOUT_ERROR:
+ dev_warn(nct6694->dev, "Command timed out!\n");
+ break;
+ case NCT6694_PENDING:
+ dev_warn(nct6694->dev, "Command is pending!\n");
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return -EIO;
+}
+
+int nct6694_read_msg(struct nct6694 *nct6694, const struct nct6694_cmd_header *cmd_hd, void *buf)
+{
+ union nct6694_usb_msg *msg = nct6694->usb_msg;
+ int tx_len, rx_len, ret;
+
+ guard(mutex)(&nct6694->access_lock);
+
+ /* Send command packet to USB device */
+ memcpy(&msg->cmd_header, cmd_hd, sizeof(*cmd_hd));
+ msg->cmd_header.hctrl = NCT6694_HCTRL_GET;
+
+ ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
+ usb_sndbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_OUT_EP),
+ &msg->cmd_header, sizeof(*msg), &tx_len,
+ nct6694->timeout);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Receive response packet from USB device */
+ ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
+ usb_rcvbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_IN_EP),
+ &msg->response_header, sizeof(*msg), &rx_len,
+ nct6694->timeout);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Receive data packet from USB device */
+ ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
+ usb_rcvbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_IN_EP),
+ buf, le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len), &rx_len,
+ nct6694->timeout);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (rx_len != le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len)) {
+ dev_err(nct6694->dev, "Expected received length %d, but got %d\n",
+ le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len), rx_len);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ return nct6694_response_err_handling(nct6694, msg->response_header.sts);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(nct6694_read_msg);
+
+int nct6694_write_msg(struct nct6694 *nct6694, const struct nct6694_cmd_header *cmd_hd, void *buf)
+{
+ union nct6694_usb_msg *msg = nct6694->usb_msg;
+ int tx_len, rx_len, ret;
+
+ guard(mutex)(&nct6694->access_lock);
+
+ /* Send command packet to USB device */
+ memcpy(&msg->cmd_header, cmd_hd, sizeof(*cmd_hd));
+ msg->cmd_header.hctrl = NCT6694_HCTRL_SET;
+
+ ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
+ usb_sndbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_OUT_EP),
+ &msg->cmd_header, sizeof(*msg), &tx_len,
+ nct6694->timeout);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Send data packet to USB device */
+ ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
+ usb_sndbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_OUT_EP),
+ buf, le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len), &tx_len,
+ nct6694->timeout);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Receive response packet from USB device */
+ ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
+ usb_rcvbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_IN_EP),
+ &msg->response_header, sizeof(*msg), &rx_len,
+ nct6694->timeout);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Receive data packet from USB device */
+ ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
+ usb_rcvbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_IN_EP),
+ buf, le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len), &rx_len,
+ nct6694->timeout);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (rx_len != le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len)) {
+ dev_err(nct6694->dev, "Expected transmitted length %d, but got %d\n",
+ le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len), rx_len);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ return nct6694_response_err_handling(nct6694, msg->response_header.sts);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(nct6694_write_msg);
+
+static void usb_int_callback(struct urb *urb)
+{
+ struct nct6694 *nct6694 = urb->context;
+ unsigned int *int_status = urb->transfer_buffer;
+ int ret;
+
+ switch (urb->status) {
+ case 0:
+ break;
+ case -ECONNRESET:
+ case -ENOENT:
+ case -ESHUTDOWN:
+ return;
+ default:
+ goto resubmit;
+ }
+
+ while (*int_status) {
+ int irq = __ffs(*int_status);
+
+ generic_handle_irq_safe(irq_find_mapping(nct6694->domain, irq));
+ *int_status &= ~BIT(irq);
+ }
+
+resubmit:
+ ret = usb_submit_urb(urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (ret)
+ dev_dbg(nct6694->dev, "%s: Failed to resubmit urb, status %pe",
+ __func__, ERR_PTR(ret));
+}
+
+static void nct6694_irq_lock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct nct6694 *nct6694 = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+ mutex_lock(&nct6694->irq_lock);
+}
+
+static void nct6694_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct nct6694 *nct6694 = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&nct6694->irq_lock);
+}
+
+static void nct6694_irq_enable(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct nct6694 *nct6694 = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
+
+ nct6694->irq_enable |= BIT(hwirq);
+}
+
+static void nct6694_irq_disable(struct irq_data *data)
+{
+ struct nct6694 *nct6694 = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
+
+ nct6694->irq_enable &= ~BIT(hwirq);
+}
+
+static const struct irq_chip nct6694_irq_chip = {
+ .name = "nct6694-irq",
+ .flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
+ .irq_bus_lock = nct6694_irq_lock,
+ .irq_bus_sync_unlock = nct6694_irq_sync_unlock,
+ .irq_enable = nct6694_irq_enable,
+ .irq_disable = nct6694_irq_disable,
+};
+
+static int nct6694_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
+ irq_hw_number_t hw)
+{
+ struct nct6694 *nct6694 = d->host_data;
+
+ irq_set_chip_data(irq, nct6694);
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &nct6694_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void nct6694_irq_domain_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq)
+{
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, NULL, NULL);
+ irq_set_chip_data(irq, NULL);
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops nct6694_irq_domain_ops = {
+ .map = nct6694_irq_domain_map,
+ .unmap = nct6694_irq_domain_unmap,
+};
+
+static int nct6694_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *iface,
+ const struct usb_device_id *id)
+{
+ struct usb_device *udev = interface_to_usbdev(iface);
+ struct usb_endpoint_descriptor *int_endpoint;
+ struct usb_host_interface *interface;
+ struct device *dev = &iface->dev;
+ struct nct6694 *nct6694;
+ int pipe, maxp;
+ int ret;
+
+ nct6694 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*nct6694), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!nct6694)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ pipe = usb_rcvintpipe(udev, NCT6694_INT_IN_EP);
+ maxp = usb_maxpacket(udev, pipe);
+
+ nct6694->usb_msg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(union nct6694_usb_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!nct6694->usb_msg)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ nct6694->int_buffer = devm_kzalloc(dev, maxp, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!nct6694->int_buffer)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ nct6694->int_in_urb = usb_alloc_urb(0, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!nct6694->int_in_urb)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ nct6694->domain = irq_domain_add_simple(NULL, NCT6694_NR_IRQS, 0,
+ &nct6694_irq_domain_ops,
+ nct6694);
+ if (!nct6694->domain) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto err_urb;
+ }
+
+ nct6694->dev = dev;
+ nct6694->udev = udev;
+ nct6694->timeout = NCT6694_URB_TIMEOUT; /* Wait until URB completes */
+
+ ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, &nct6694->access_lock);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_urb;
+
+ ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, &nct6694->irq_lock);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_urb;
+
+ interface = iface->cur_altsetting;
+ int_endpoint = &interface->endpoint[0].desc;
+ if (!usb_endpoint_is_int_in(int_endpoint)) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto err_urb;
+ }
+ usb_fill_int_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb, udev, pipe,
+ nct6694->int_buffer, maxp, usb_int_callback,
+ nct6694, int_endpoint->bInterval);
+ ret = usb_submit_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_urb;
+
+ usb_set_intfdata(iface, nct6694);
+
+ ret = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(dev, nct6694_dev, ARRAY_SIZE(nct6694_dev));
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_mfd;
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_mfd:
+ usb_kill_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb);
+err_urb:
+ usb_free_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void nct6694_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *iface)
+{
+ struct nct6694 *nct6694 = usb_get_intfdata(iface);
+
+ mfd_remove_devices(nct6694->dev);
+ usb_kill_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb);
+ usb_free_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb);
+}
+
+static const struct usb_device_id nct6694_ids[] = {
+ { USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(NCT6694_VENDOR_ID,
+ NCT6694_PRODUCT_ID,
+ 0xFF, 0x00, 0x00)},
+ {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(usb, nct6694_ids);
+
+static struct usb_driver nct6694_usb_driver = {
+ .name = "nct6694",
+ .id_table = nct6694_ids,
+ .probe = nct6694_usb_probe,
+ .disconnect = nct6694_usb_disconnect,
+};
+
+module_usb_driver(nct6694_usb_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("USB core driver for NCT6694");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Ming Yu <tmyu0@nuvoton.com>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h b/include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8171f975761e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Nuvoton NCT6694 USB transaction and data structure.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Nuvoton Technology Corp.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __MFD_NCT6694_H
+#define __MFD_NCT6694_H
+
+#define NCT6694_VENDOR_ID 0x0416
+#define NCT6694_PRODUCT_ID 0x200B
+#define NCT6694_INT_IN_EP 0x81
+#define NCT6694_BULK_IN_EP 0x02
+#define NCT6694_BULK_OUT_EP 0x03
+
+#define NCT6694_HCTRL_SET 0x40
+#define NCT6694_HCTRL_GET 0x80
+
+#define NCT6694_URB_TIMEOUT 1000
+
+enum nct6694_irq_id {
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO0 = 0,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO1,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO2,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO3,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO4,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO5,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO6,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO7,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO8,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO9,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIOA,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIOB,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIOC,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIOD,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIOE,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_GPIOF,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_CAN0,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_CAN1,
+ NCT6694_IRQ_RTC,
+ NCT6694_NR_IRQS,
+};
+
+enum nct6694_response_err_status {
+ NCT6694_NO_ERROR = 0,
+ NCT6694_FORMAT_ERROR,
+ NCT6694_RESERVED1,
+ NCT6694_RESERVED2,
+ NCT6694_NOT_SUPPORT_ERROR,
+ NCT6694_NO_RESPONSE_ERROR,
+ NCT6694_TIMEOUT_ERROR,
+ NCT6694_PENDING,
+};
+
+struct __packed nct6694_cmd_header {
+ u8 rsv1;
+ u8 mod;
+ union __packed {
+ __le16 offset;
+ struct __packed {
+ u8 cmd;
+ u8 sel;
+ };
+ };
+ u8 hctrl;
+ u8 rsv2;
+ __le16 len;
+};
+
+struct __packed nct6694_response_header {
+ u8 sequence_id;
+ u8 sts;
+ u8 reserved[4];
+ __le16 len;
+};
+
+union __packed nct6694_usb_msg {
+ struct nct6694_cmd_header cmd_header;
+ struct nct6694_response_header response_header;
+};
+
+struct nct6694 {
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct irq_domain *domain;
+ /* Mutex to protect access to the device */
+ struct mutex access_lock;
+ /* Mutex to protect access to the IRQ */
+ struct mutex irq_lock;
+ struct urb *int_in_urb;
+ struct usb_device *udev;
+ union nct6694_usb_msg *usb_msg;
+ unsigned char *int_buffer;
+ unsigned int irq_enable;
+ /* Time in msec to wait for the URB to the complete */
+ long timeout;
+};
+
+int nct6694_read_msg(struct nct6694 *nct6694, const struct nct6694_cmd_header *cmd_hd, void *buf);
+int nct6694_write_msg(struct nct6694 *nct6694, const struct nct6694_cmd_header *cmd_hd, void *buf);
+
+#endif
--
2.34.1
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025, Ming Yu wrote:
> The Nuvoton NCT6694 is a peripheral expander with 16 GPIO chips,
> 6 I2C controllers, 2 CANfd controllers, 2 Watchdog timers, ADC,
> PWM, and RTC.
This needs to go into the Kconfig help passage.
> This driver implements USB device functionality and shares the
> chip's peripherals as a child device.
This driver doesn't implement USB functionality.
> Each child device can use the USB functions nct6694_read_msg()
> and nct6694_write_msg() to issue a command. They can also request
> interrupt that will be called when the USB device receives its
> interrupt pipe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Yu <a0282524688@gmail.com>
Why aren't you signing off with your work address?
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 18 ++
> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/mfd/nct6694.c | 378 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h | 102 ++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 507 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/nct6694.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 873aa2cce4d7..c700a0b96960 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -16918,6 +16918,13 @@ F: drivers/nubus/
> F: include/linux/nubus.h
> F: include/uapi/linux/nubus.h
>
> +NUVOTON NCT6694 MFD DRIVER
> +M: Ming Yu <tmyu0@nuvoton.com>
> +L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
This is the default list. You shouldn't need to add that here.
> +S: Supported
> +F: drivers/mfd/nct6694.c
> +F: include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h
> +
> NVIDIA (rivafb and nvidiafb) FRAMEBUFFER DRIVER
> M: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>
> L: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> index 6b0682af6e32..c97a2bdcea0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> @@ -1045,6 +1045,24 @@ config MFD_MENF21BMC
> This driver can also be built as a module. If so the module
> will be called menf21bmc.
>
> +config MFD_NCT6694
> + tristate "Nuvoton NCT6694 support"
> + select MFD_CORE
> + depends on USB
> + help
> + This enables support for the Nuvoton USB device NCT6694, which shares
> + peripherals.
> +
> + This driver provides core APIs to access the NCT6694 hardware
> + monitoring and control features.
> +
> + The NCT6694 is a versatile multi-function device that supports
Please drop the term multi-function device and replace it what a proper
description of the devices.
> + functionalities such as GPIO, I2C, CAN, WDT, HWMON, and RTC
> + management.
All of these line breaks should be removed.
> + Additional drivers must be enabled to utilize the specific
> + functionalities of the device.
> +
> config MFD_OCELOT
> tristate "Microsemi Ocelot External Control Support"
> depends on SPI_MASTER
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> index 9220eaf7cf12..7725b732e265 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MC13XXX) += mc13xxx-core.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MC13XXX_SPI) += mc13xxx-spi.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MC13XXX_I2C) += mc13xxx-i2c.o
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_NCT6694) += nct6694.o
> +
> obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_CORE) += mfd-core.o
>
> ocelot-soc-objs := ocelot-core.o ocelot-spi.o
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/nct6694.c b/drivers/mfd/nct6694.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c82457679ca6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/nct6694.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Nuvoton NCT6694 core driver using USB interface to provide
> + * access to the NCT6694 hardware monitoring and control features.
> + *
> + * The NCT6694 is a versatile multi-function device that supports
Here too.
> + * functionalities such as GPIO, I2C, CAN, WDT, HWMON and RTC
> + * management.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Nuvoton Technology Corp.
This goes at the top.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/bits.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/nct6694.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/usb.h>
> +
> +static const struct mfd_cell nct6694_dev[] = {
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x0),
"-gpio" usually goes on the end.
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
IDs are usually given in base-10.
Why are you manually adding the device IDs?
PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO doesn't work for you?
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x2),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x3),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x4),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x5),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x6),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x7),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x8),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x9),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xA),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xB),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xC),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xD),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xE),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xF),
> +
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x0),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x2),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x3),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x4),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x5),
> +
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_canfd", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x0),
Why has the naming convention changed here?
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_canfd", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
> +
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_wdt", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x0),
> + MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_wdt", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
> +
> + MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-hwmon"),
> + MFD_CELL_NAME("rtc-nct6694"),
There doesn't seem to be any consistency here.
> +};
> +
> +static int nct6694_response_err_handling(struct nct6694 *nct6694,
> +{
> + switch (err_status) {
> + case NCT6694_NO_ERROR:
> + return err_status;
This is odd since you already know this will be 0.
> + case NCT6694_NOT_SUPPORT_ERROR:
> + dev_warn(nct6694->dev, "Command is not supported!\n");
Why not dev_err()?
> + break;
> + case NCT6694_NO_RESPONSE_ERROR:
> + dev_warn(nct6694->dev, "Command received no response!\n");
> + break;
> + case NCT6694_TIMEOUT_ERROR:
> + dev_warn(nct6694->dev, "Command timed out!\n");
> + break;
> + case NCT6694_PENDING:
> + dev_warn(nct6694->dev, "Command is pending!\n");
Is this an error?
> + break;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return -EIO;
> +}
> +
> +int nct6694_read_msg(struct nct6694 *nct6694, const struct nct6694_cmd_header *cmd_hd, void *buf)
> +{
> + union nct6694_usb_msg *msg = nct6694->usb_msg;
> + int tx_len, rx_len, ret;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&nct6694->access_lock);
> +
> + /* Send command packet to USB device */
This doesn't really describe the next 2 lines.
Move it down?
> + memcpy(&msg->cmd_header, cmd_hd, sizeof(*cmd_hd));
> + msg->cmd_header.hctrl = NCT6694_HCTRL_GET;
> +
> + ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
Since you use nct6694->udev a bunch - sometimes twice in the same call,
it might be nicer to pull it into it's own variable instead of
dereferencing it all the time.
> + usb_sndbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_OUT_EP),
> + &msg->cmd_header, sizeof(*msg), &tx_len,
> + nct6694->timeout);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Receive response packet from USB device */
> + ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
> + usb_rcvbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_IN_EP),
> + &msg->response_header, sizeof(*msg), &rx_len,
How can you read sizeof(*msg) Bytes (22?) into the smaller
response_header (16?) attribute?
> + nct6694->timeout);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Receive data packet from USB device */
> + ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
> + usb_rcvbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_IN_EP),
> + buf, le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len), &rx_len,
> + nct6694->timeout);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (rx_len != le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len)) {
> + dev_err(nct6694->dev, "Expected received length %d, but got %d\n",
> + le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len), rx_len);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + return nct6694_response_err_handling(nct6694, msg->response_header.sts);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(nct6694_read_msg);
> +
> +int nct6694_write_msg(struct nct6694 *nct6694, const struct nct6694_cmd_header *cmd_hd, void *buf)
> +{
> + union nct6694_usb_msg *msg = nct6694->usb_msg;
> + int tx_len, rx_len, ret;
> +
> + guard(mutex)(&nct6694->access_lock);
> +
> + /* Send command packet to USB device */
> + memcpy(&msg->cmd_header, cmd_hd, sizeof(*cmd_hd));
> + msg->cmd_header.hctrl = NCT6694_HCTRL_SET;
> +
> + ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
> + usb_sndbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_OUT_EP),
> + &msg->cmd_header, sizeof(*msg), &tx_len,
> + nct6694->timeout);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Send data packet to USB device */
> + ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
> + usb_sndbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_OUT_EP),
> + buf, le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len), &tx_len,
> + nct6694->timeout);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Receive response packet from USB device */
> + ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
> + usb_rcvbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_IN_EP),
> + &msg->response_header, sizeof(*msg), &rx_len,
> + nct6694->timeout);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Receive data packet from USB device */
> + ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
> + usb_rcvbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_IN_EP),
> + buf, le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len), &rx_len,
> + nct6694->timeout);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (rx_len != le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len)) {
> + dev_err(nct6694->dev, "Expected transmitted length %d, but got %d\n",
> + le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len), rx_len);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + return nct6694_response_err_handling(nct6694, msg->response_header.sts);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(nct6694_write_msg);
> +
> +static void usb_int_callback(struct urb *urb)
> +{
> + struct nct6694 *nct6694 = urb->context;
> + unsigned int *int_status = urb->transfer_buffer;
> + int ret;
> +
> + switch (urb->status) {
> + case 0:
> + break;
> + case -ECONNRESET:
> + case -ENOENT:
> + case -ESHUTDOWN:
> + return;
> + default:
> + generic_handle_irq_safe(irq_find_mapping(nct6694->domain, irq));
> + *int_status &= ~BIT(irq);
> + }
> +
> +resubmit:
> + ret = usb_submit_urb(urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_dbg(nct6694->dev, "%s: Failed to resubmit urb, status %pe",
Why debug?
> + __func__, ERR_PTR(ret));
Remove the __func__ part.
> +}
> +
> +static void nct6694_irq_lock(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct nct6694 *nct6694 = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&nct6694->irq_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void nct6694_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct nct6694 *nct6694 = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&nct6694->irq_lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void nct6694_irq_enable(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct nct6694 *nct6694 = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
> +
> + nct6694->irq_enable |= BIT(hwirq);
> +}
> +
> +static void nct6694_irq_disable(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct nct6694 *nct6694 = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> + irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(data);
> +
> + nct6694->irq_enable &= ~BIT(hwirq);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_chip nct6694_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "nct6694-irq",
> + .flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE,
> + .irq_bus_lock = nct6694_irq_lock,
> + .irq_bus_sync_unlock = nct6694_irq_sync_unlock,
> + .irq_enable = nct6694_irq_enable,
> + .irq_disable = nct6694_irq_disable,
> +};
> +
> +static int nct6694_irq_domain_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
> + irq_hw_number_t hw)
> +{
> + struct nct6694 *nct6694 = d->host_data;
> +
> + irq_set_chip_data(irq, nct6694);
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &nct6694_irq_chip, handle_simple_irq);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void nct6694_irq_domain_unmap(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, NULL, NULL);
> + irq_set_chip_data(irq, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct irq_domain_ops nct6694_irq_domain_ops = {
> + .map = nct6694_irq_domain_map,
> + .unmap = nct6694_irq_domain_unmap,
> +};
> +
> +static int nct6694_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *iface,
> + const struct usb_device_id *id)
> +{
> + struct usb_device *udev = interface_to_usbdev(iface);
> + struct usb_endpoint_descriptor *int_endpoint;
> + struct usb_host_interface *interface;
> + struct device *dev = &iface->dev;
> + struct nct6694 *nct6694;
> + int pipe, maxp;
> + int ret;
> +
> + nct6694 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*nct6694), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!nct6694)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + pipe = usb_rcvintpipe(udev, NCT6694_INT_IN_EP);
> + maxp = usb_maxpacket(udev, pipe);
> +
> + nct6694->usb_msg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(union nct6694_usb_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!nct6694->usb_msg)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + nct6694->int_buffer = devm_kzalloc(dev, maxp, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!nct6694->int_buffer)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + nct6694->int_in_urb = usb_alloc_urb(0, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!nct6694->int_in_urb)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + nct6694->domain = irq_domain_add_simple(NULL, NCT6694_NR_IRQS, 0,
> + &nct6694_irq_domain_ops,
> + nct6694);
> + if (!nct6694->domain) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_urb;
> + }
> +
> + nct6694->dev = dev;
> + nct6694->udev = udev;
> + nct6694->timeout = NCT6694_URB_TIMEOUT; /* Wait until URB completes */
No need to save this known value.
> + ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, &nct6694->access_lock);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_urb;
> +
> + ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, &nct6694->irq_lock);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_urb;
> +
> + interface = iface->cur_altsetting;
> + int_endpoint = &interface->endpoint[0].desc;
> + if (!usb_endpoint_is_int_in(int_endpoint)) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_urb;
> + }
> + usb_fill_int_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb, udev, pipe,
> + nct6694->int_buffer, maxp, usb_int_callback,
> + nct6694, int_endpoint->bInterval);
> + ret = usb_submit_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_urb;
Please unsquash these calls - space them out.
> +
> + usb_set_intfdata(iface, nct6694);
> +
> + ret = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(dev, nct6694_dev, ARRAY_SIZE(nct6694_dev));
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_mfd;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_mfd:
> + usb_kill_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb);
> +err_urb:
> + usb_free_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void nct6694_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *iface)
> +{
> + struct nct6694 *nct6694 = usb_get_intfdata(iface);
> +
> + mfd_remove_devices(nct6694->dev);
> + usb_kill_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb);
> + usb_free_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct usb_device_id nct6694_ids[] = {
> + { USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(NCT6694_VENDOR_ID,
> + NCT6694_PRODUCT_ID,
> + 0xFF, 0x00, 0x00)},
This should fit on one line. You can use up to 100-chars.
> + {}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(usb, nct6694_ids);
> +
> +static struct usb_driver nct6694_usb_driver = {
> + .name = "nct6694",
Odd spaces.
> + .id_table = nct6694_ids,
> + .probe = nct6694_usb_probe,
> + .disconnect = nct6694_usb_disconnect,
> +};
> +
Remove this line.
> +module_usb_driver(nct6694_usb_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("USB core driver for NCT6694");
This is not a USB driver.
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ming Yu <tmyu0@nuvoton.com>");
Different to SoB.
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h b/include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8171f975761e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Nuvoton NCT6694 USB transaction and data structure.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2024 Nuvoton Technology Corp.
At the top.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __MFD_NCT6694_H
> +#define __MFD_NCT6694_H
> +
> +#define NCT6694_VENDOR_ID 0x0416
> +#define NCT6694_PRODUCT_ID 0x200B
> +#define NCT6694_INT_IN_EP 0x81
> +#define NCT6694_BULK_IN_EP 0x02
> +#define NCT6694_BULK_OUT_EP 0x03
> +
> +#define NCT6694_HCTRL_SET 0x40
> +#define NCT6694_HCTRL_GET 0x80
> +
> +#define NCT6694_URB_TIMEOUT 1000
> +
> +enum nct6694_irq_id {
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO0 = 0,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO1,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO2,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO3,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO4,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO5,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO6,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO7,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO8,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIO9,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIOA,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIOB,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIOC,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIOD,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIOE,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_GPIOF,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_CAN0,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_CAN1,
> + NCT6694_IRQ_RTC,
> + NCT6694_NR_IRQS,
> +};
> +
> +enum nct6694_response_err_status {
> + NCT6694_NO_ERROR = 0,
> + NCT6694_FORMAT_ERROR,
> + NCT6694_RESERVED1,
> + NCT6694_RESERVED2,
> + NCT6694_NOT_SUPPORT_ERROR,
> + NCT6694_NO_RESPONSE_ERROR,
> + NCT6694_TIMEOUT_ERROR,
> + NCT6694_PENDING,
> +};
> +
> +struct __packed nct6694_cmd_header {
> + u8 rsv1;
> + u8 mod;
> + union __packed {
> + __le16 offset;
> + struct __packed {
> + u8 cmd;
> + u8 sel;
> + };
> + };
> + u8 hctrl;
> + u8 rsv2;
> + __le16 len;
> +};
> +
> +struct __packed nct6694_response_header {
> + u8 sequence_id;
> + u8 sts;
> + u8 reserved[4];
> + __le16 len;
> +};
> +
> +union __packed nct6694_usb_msg {
> + struct nct6694_cmd_header cmd_header;
> + struct nct6694_response_header response_header;
> +};
> +
> +struct nct6694 {
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct irq_domain *domain;
> + /* Mutex to protect access to the device */
> + struct mutex access_lock;
> + /* Mutex to protect access to the IRQ */
> + struct mutex irq_lock;
> + struct urb *int_in_urb;
> + struct usb_device *udev;
> + union nct6694_usb_msg *usb_msg;
> + unsigned char *int_buffer;
> + unsigned int irq_enable;
> + /* Time in msec to wait for the URB to the complete */
> + long timeout;
timeout_ms
> +};
> +
> +int nct6694_read_msg(struct nct6694 *nct6694, const struct nct6694_cmd_header *cmd_hd, void *buf);
> +int nct6694_write_msg(struct nct6694 *nct6694, const struct nct6694_cmd_header *cmd_hd, void *buf);
> +
> +#endif
> --
> 2.34.1
>
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Dear Lee,
Thank you for reviewing,
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> 於 2025年3月7日 週五 上午9:15寫道:
>
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2025, Ming Yu wrote:
>
> > The Nuvoton NCT6694 is a peripheral expander with 16 GPIO chips,
> > 6 I2C controllers, 2 CANfd controllers, 2 Watchdog timers, ADC,
> > PWM, and RTC.
>
> This needs to go into the Kconfig help passage.
>
Okay, I will move these to Kconfig in the next patch.
> > This driver implements USB device functionality and shares the
> > chip's peripherals as a child device.
>
> This driver doesn't implement USB functionality.
>
Fix it in v9.
> > Each child device can use the USB functions nct6694_read_msg()
> > and nct6694_write_msg() to issue a command. They can also request
> > interrupt that will be called when the USB device receives its
> > interrupt pipe.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Yu <a0282524688@gmail.com>
>
> Why aren't you signing off with your work address?
>
Fix it in v9.
> > ---
> > MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 18 ++
> > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +
> > drivers/mfd/nct6694.c | 378 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h | 102 ++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 507 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/nct6694.c
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 873aa2cce4d7..c700a0b96960 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -16918,6 +16918,13 @@ F: drivers/nubus/
> > F: include/linux/nubus.h
> > F: include/uapi/linux/nubus.h
> >
> > +NUVOTON NCT6694 MFD DRIVER
> > +M: Ming Yu <tmyu0@nuvoton.com>
> > +L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>
> This is the default list. You shouldn't need to add that here.
>
Remove it in v9.
> > +S: Supported
> > +F: drivers/mfd/nct6694.c
> > +F: include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h
> > +
> > NVIDIA (rivafb and nvidiafb) FRAMEBUFFER DRIVER
> > M: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>
> > L: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > index 6b0682af6e32..c97a2bdcea0b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> > @@ -1045,6 +1045,24 @@ config MFD_MENF21BMC
> > This driver can also be built as a module. If so the module
> > will be called menf21bmc.
> >
> > +config MFD_NCT6694
> > + tristate "Nuvoton NCT6694 support"
> > + select MFD_CORE
> > + depends on USB
> > + help
> > + This enables support for the Nuvoton USB device NCT6694, which shares
> > + peripherals.
> > +
> > + This driver provides core APIs to access the NCT6694 hardware
> > + monitoring and control features.
> > +
> > + The NCT6694 is a versatile multi-function device that supports
>
> Please drop the term multi-function device and replace it what a proper
> description of the devices.
>
Fix it in v9.
> > + functionalities such as GPIO, I2C, CAN, WDT, HWMON, and RTC
> > + management.
>
> All of these line breaks should be removed.
>
Fix these in v9.
> > + Additional drivers must be enabled to utilize the specific
> > + functionalities of the device.
> > +
> > config MFD_OCELOT
> > tristate "Microsemi Ocelot External Control Support"
> > depends on SPI_MASTER
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Makefile b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > index 9220eaf7cf12..7725b732e265 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/Makefile
> > @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MC13XXX) += mc13xxx-core.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MC13XXX_SPI) += mc13xxx-spi.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_MC13XXX_I2C) += mc13xxx-i2c.o
> >
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_NCT6694) += nct6694.o
> > +
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_CORE) += mfd-core.o
> >
> > ocelot-soc-objs := ocelot-core.o ocelot-spi.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/nct6694.c b/drivers/mfd/nct6694.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..c82457679ca6
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/nct6694.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Nuvoton NCT6694 core driver using USB interface to provide
> > + * access to the NCT6694 hardware monitoring and control features.
> > + *
> > + * The NCT6694 is a versatile multi-function device that supports
>
> Here too.
>
Fix it in v9.
> > + * functionalities such as GPIO, I2C, CAN, WDT, HWMON and RTC
> > + * management.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2024 Nuvoton Technology Corp.
>
> This goes at the top.
>
Fix it in v9.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/bits.h>
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <linux/irq.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> > +#include <linux/mfd/nct6694.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/usb.h>
> > +
> > +static const struct mfd_cell nct6694_dev[] = {
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x0),
>
> "-gpio" usually goes on the end.
>
Fix it in v9.
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
>
> IDs are usually given in base-10.
>
Fix it in v9.
> Why are you manually adding the device IDs?
>
> PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO doesn't work for you?
>
I need to manage these IDs to ensure that child devices can be
properly utilized within their respective modules.
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x2),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x3),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x4),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x5),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x6),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x7),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x8),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x9),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xA),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xB),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xC),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xD),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xE),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xF),
> > +
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x0),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x2),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x3),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x4),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x5),
> > +
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_canfd", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x0),
>
> Why has the naming convention changed here?
>
I originally expected the child devices name to directly match its
driver name. Do you think it would be better to standardize the naming
as "nct6694-xxx" ?
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_canfd", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
> > +
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_wdt", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x0),
> > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_wdt", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
> > +
> > + MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-hwmon"),
> > + MFD_CELL_NAME("rtc-nct6694"),
>
> There doesn't seem to be any consistency here.
>
Do you think these two should be changed to use MFD_CELL_BASIC()?
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int nct6694_response_err_handling(struct nct6694 *nct6694,
>
> > +{
> > + switch (err_status) {
> > + case NCT6694_NO_ERROR:
> > + return err_status;
>
> This is odd since you already know this will be 0.
>
Fix it in v9.
> > + case NCT6694_NOT_SUPPORT_ERROR:
> > + dev_warn(nct6694->dev, "Command is not supported!\n");
>
> Why not dev_err()?
>
Fix it in v9.
> > + break;
> > + case NCT6694_NO_RESPONSE_ERROR:
> > + dev_warn(nct6694->dev, "Command received no response!\n");
> > + break;
> > + case NCT6694_TIMEOUT_ERROR:
> > + dev_warn(nct6694->dev, "Command timed out!\n");
> > + break;
> > + case NCT6694_PENDING:
> > + dev_warn(nct6694->dev, "Command is pending!\n");
>
> Is this an error?
>
Yes, I will fix it to dev_err() in the next patch.
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return -EIO;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int nct6694_read_msg(struct nct6694 *nct6694, const struct nct6694_cmd_header *cmd_hd, void *buf)
> > +{
> > + union nct6694_usb_msg *msg = nct6694->usb_msg;
> > + int tx_len, rx_len, ret;
> > +
> > + guard(mutex)(&nct6694->access_lock);
> > +
> > + /* Send command packet to USB device */
>
> This doesn't really describe the next 2 lines.
>
> Move it down?
>
Fix it in v9.
> > + memcpy(&msg->cmd_header, cmd_hd, sizeof(*cmd_hd));
> > + msg->cmd_header.hctrl = NCT6694_HCTRL_GET;
> > +
> > + ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
>
> Since you use nct6694->udev a bunch - sometimes twice in the same call,
> it might be nicer to pull it into it's own variable instead of
> dereferencing it all the time.
>
Fix it in v9.
> > + usb_sndbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_OUT_EP),
> > + &msg->cmd_header, sizeof(*msg), &tx_len,
> > + nct6694->timeout);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* Receive response packet from USB device */
> > + ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
> > + usb_rcvbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_IN_EP),
> > + &msg->response_header, sizeof(*msg), &rx_len,
>
> How can you read sizeof(*msg) Bytes (22?) into the smaller
> response_header (16?) attribute?
>
The size of (*msg) is the same as command_header and response_header (8 bytes).
> > + nct6694->timeout);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* Receive data packet from USB device */
> > + ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
> > + usb_rcvbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_IN_EP),
> > + buf, le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len), &rx_len,
> > + nct6694->timeout);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + if (rx_len != le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len)) {
> > + dev_err(nct6694->dev, "Expected received length %d, but got %d\n",
> > + le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len), rx_len);
> > + return -EIO;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return nct6694_response_err_handling(nct6694, msg->response_header.sts);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(nct6694_read_msg);
> > +
> > +int nct6694_write_msg(struct nct6694 *nct6694, const struct nct6694_cmd_header *cmd_hd, void *buf)
> > +{
> > + union nct6694_usb_msg *msg = nct6694->usb_msg;
> > + int tx_len, rx_len, ret;
> > +
> > + guard(mutex)(&nct6694->access_lock);
> > +
> > + /* Send command packet to USB device */
> > + memcpy(&msg->cmd_header, cmd_hd, sizeof(*cmd_hd));
> > + msg->cmd_header.hctrl = NCT6694_HCTRL_SET;
> > +
> > + ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
> > + usb_sndbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_OUT_EP),
> > + &msg->cmd_header, sizeof(*msg), &tx_len,
> > + nct6694->timeout);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* Send data packet to USB device */
> > + ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
> > + usb_sndbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_OUT_EP),
> > + buf, le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len), &tx_len,
> > + nct6694->timeout);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* Receive response packet from USB device */
> > + ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
> > + usb_rcvbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_IN_EP),
> > + &msg->response_header, sizeof(*msg), &rx_len,
> > + nct6694->timeout);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* Receive data packet from USB device */
> > + ret = usb_bulk_msg(nct6694->udev,
> > + usb_rcvbulkpipe(nct6694->udev, NCT6694_BULK_IN_EP),
> > + buf, le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len), &rx_len,
> > + nct6694->timeout);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + if (rx_len != le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len)) {
> > + dev_err(nct6694->dev, "Expected transmitted length %d, but got %d\n",
> > + le16_to_cpu(cmd_hd->len), rx_len);
> > + return -EIO;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return nct6694_response_err_handling(nct6694, msg->response_header.sts);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(nct6694_write_msg);
> > +
> > +static void usb_int_callback(struct urb *urb)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694 *nct6694 = urb->context;
> > + unsigned int *int_status = urb->transfer_buffer;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + switch (urb->status) {
> > + case 0:
> > + break;
> > + case -ECONNRESET:
> > + case -ENOENT:
> > + case -ESHUTDOWN:
> > + return;
> > + default:
> > + generic_handle_irq_safe(irq_find_mapping(nct6694->domain, irq));
> > + *int_status &= ~BIT(irq);
> > + }
> > +
> > +resubmit:
> > + ret = usb_submit_urb(urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_dbg(nct6694->dev, "%s: Failed to resubmit urb, status %pe",
>
> Why debug?
>
Excuse me, do you think it should change to dev_err()?
> > + __func__, ERR_PTR(ret));
>
> Remove the __func__ part.
>
Understood.
> > +}
> > +
...
> > +static int nct6694_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *iface,
> > + const struct usb_device_id *id)
> > +{
> > + struct usb_device *udev = interface_to_usbdev(iface);
> > + struct usb_endpoint_descriptor *int_endpoint;
> > + struct usb_host_interface *interface;
> > + struct device *dev = &iface->dev;
> > + struct nct6694 *nct6694;
> > + int pipe, maxp;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + nct6694 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*nct6694), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!nct6694)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + pipe = usb_rcvintpipe(udev, NCT6694_INT_IN_EP);
> > + maxp = usb_maxpacket(udev, pipe);
> > +
> > + nct6694->usb_msg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(union nct6694_usb_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!nct6694->usb_msg)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + nct6694->int_buffer = devm_kzalloc(dev, maxp, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!nct6694->int_buffer)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + nct6694->int_in_urb = usb_alloc_urb(0, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!nct6694->int_in_urb)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + nct6694->domain = irq_domain_add_simple(NULL, NCT6694_NR_IRQS, 0,
> > + &nct6694_irq_domain_ops,
> > + nct6694);
> > + if (!nct6694->domain) {
> > + ret = -ENODEV;
> > + goto err_urb;
> > + }
> > +
> > + nct6694->dev = dev;
> > + nct6694->udev = udev;
> > + nct6694->timeout = NCT6694_URB_TIMEOUT; /* Wait until URB completes */
>
> No need to save this known value.
>
Understood, I will drop it in the next patch.
> > + ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, &nct6694->access_lock);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto err_urb;
> > +
> > + ret = devm_mutex_init(dev, &nct6694->irq_lock);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto err_urb;
> > +
> > + interface = iface->cur_altsetting;
> > + int_endpoint = &interface->endpoint[0].desc;
> > + if (!usb_endpoint_is_int_in(int_endpoint)) {
> > + ret = -ENODEV;
> > + goto err_urb;
> > + }
> > + usb_fill_int_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb, udev, pipe,
> > + nct6694->int_buffer, maxp, usb_int_callback,
> > + nct6694, int_endpoint->bInterval);
> > + ret = usb_submit_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto err_urb;
>
> Please unsquash these calls - space them out.
>
Fix these in v9.
> > +
> > + usb_set_intfdata(iface, nct6694);
> > +
> > + ret = mfd_add_hotplug_devices(dev, nct6694_dev, ARRAY_SIZE(nct6694_dev));
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto err_mfd;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +err_mfd:
> > + usb_kill_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb);
> > +err_urb:
> > + usb_free_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void nct6694_usb_disconnect(struct usb_interface *iface)
> > +{
> > + struct nct6694 *nct6694 = usb_get_intfdata(iface);
> > +
> > + mfd_remove_devices(nct6694->dev);
> > + usb_kill_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb);
> > + usb_free_urb(nct6694->int_in_urb);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct usb_device_id nct6694_ids[] = {
> > + { USB_DEVICE_AND_INTERFACE_INFO(NCT6694_VENDOR_ID,
> > + NCT6694_PRODUCT_ID,
> > + 0xFF, 0x00, 0x00)},
>
> This should fit on one line. You can use up to 100-chars.
>
Fix it in v9.
> > + {}
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(usb, nct6694_ids);
> > +
> > +static struct usb_driver nct6694_usb_driver = {
> > + .name = "nct6694",
>
> Odd spaces.
>
Fix it in v9.
> > + .id_table = nct6694_ids,
> > + .probe = nct6694_usb_probe,
> > + .disconnect = nct6694_usb_disconnect,
> > +};
> > +
>
> Remove this line.
>
Fix it in v9.
> > +module_usb_driver(nct6694_usb_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("USB core driver for NCT6694");
>
> This is not a USB driver.
>
Fix it in v9.
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ming Yu <tmyu0@nuvoton.com>");
>
> Different to SoB.
>
Fix it in v9.
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h b/include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..8171f975761e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/*
> > + * Nuvoton NCT6694 USB transaction and data structure.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2024 Nuvoton Technology Corp.
>
> At the top.
>
Fix it in v9.
> > + */
> > +
Best regards,
Ming
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025, Ming Yu wrote:
> Dear Lee,
>
> Thank you for reviewing,
>
> Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> 於 2025年3月7日 週五 上午9:15寫道:
> >
> > On Tue, 25 Feb 2025, Ming Yu wrote:
> >
> > > The Nuvoton NCT6694 is a peripheral expander with 16 GPIO chips,
> > > 6 I2C controllers, 2 CANfd controllers, 2 Watchdog timers, ADC,
> > > PWM, and RTC.
> >
> > This needs to go into the Kconfig help passage.
> >
>
> Okay, I will move these to Kconfig in the next patch.
>
> > > This driver implements USB device functionality and shares the
> > > chip's peripherals as a child device.
> >
> > This driver doesn't implement USB functionality.
> >
>
> Fix it in v9.
>
> > > Each child device can use the USB functions nct6694_read_msg()
> > > and nct6694_write_msg() to issue a command. They can also request
> > > interrupt that will be called when the USB device receives its
> > > interrupt pipe.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ming Yu <a0282524688@gmail.com>
> >
> > Why aren't you signing off with your work address?
> >
>
> Fix it in v9.
>
> > > ---
> > > MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> > > drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 18 ++
> > > drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +
> > > drivers/mfd/nct6694.c | 378 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h | 102 ++++++++++
> > > 5 files changed, 507 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/nct6694.c
> > > create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h
> > >
> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > > index 873aa2cce4d7..c700a0b96960 100644
> > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > @@ -16918,6 +16918,13 @@ F: drivers/nubus/
> > > F: include/linux/nubus.h
> > > F: include/uapi/linux/nubus.h
> > >
> > > +NUVOTON NCT6694 MFD DRIVER
> > > +M: Ming Yu <tmyu0@nuvoton.com>
> > > +L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >
> > This is the default list. You shouldn't need to add that here.
>
> Remove it in v9.
Please snip everything that you agree with.
> > > +S: Supported
> > > +F: drivers/mfd/nct6694.c
> > > +F: include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h
> > > +
> > > NVIDIA (rivafb and nvidiafb) FRAMEBUFFER DRIVER
> > > M: Antonino Daplas <adaplas@gmail.com>
> > > L: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
[...]
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
> >
> > IDs are usually given in base-10.
> >
>
> Fix it in v9.
>
> > Why are you manually adding the device IDs?
> >
> > PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO doesn't work for you?
> >
>
> I need to manage these IDs to ensure that child devices can be
> properly utilized within their respective modules.
How? Please explain.
This numbering looks sequential and arbitrary.
What does PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO do differently such that it is not useful?
>
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x2),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x3),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x4),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x5),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x6),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x7),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x8),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x9),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xA),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xB),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xC),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xD),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xE),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xF),
> > > +
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x0),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x2),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x3),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x4),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("i2c-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x5),
> > > +
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_canfd", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x0),
> >
> > Why has the naming convention changed here?
> >
>
> I originally expected the child devices name to directly match its
> driver name. Do you think it would be better to standardize the naming
> as "nct6694-xxx" ?
Yes, that is the usual procedure.
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_canfd", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
> > > +
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_wdt", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x0),
> > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("nct6694_wdt", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
> > > +
> > > + MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-hwmon"),
> > > + MFD_CELL_NAME("rtc-nct6694"),
> >
> > There doesn't seem to be any consistency here.
> >
>
> Do you think these two should be changed to use MFD_CELL_BASIC()?
No. I mean with the device nomenclature.
[...]
> > > +static void usb_int_callback(struct urb *urb)
> > > +{
> > > + struct nct6694 *nct6694 = urb->context;
> > > + unsigned int *int_status = urb->transfer_buffer;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + switch (urb->status) {
> > > + case 0:
> > > + break;
> > > + case -ECONNRESET:
> > > + case -ENOENT:
> > > + case -ESHUTDOWN:
> > > + return;
> > > + default:
> > > + generic_handle_irq_safe(irq_find_mapping(nct6694->domain, irq));
> > > + *int_status &= ~BIT(irq);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > +resubmit:
> > > + ret = usb_submit_urb(urb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + dev_dbg(nct6694->dev, "%s: Failed to resubmit urb, status %pe",
> >
> > Why debug?
> >
>
> Excuse me, do you think it should change to dev_err()?
Probably a dev_warn() since you are not propagating the error.
Is this okay by the way? Is it okay to fail?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> 於 2025年3月20日 週四 下午10:50寫道:
>
...
> > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
> > >
> > > IDs are usually given in base-10.
> > >
> >
> > Fix it in v9.
> >
> > > Why are you manually adding the device IDs?
> > >
> > > PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO doesn't work for you?
> > >
> >
> > I need to manage these IDs to ensure that child devices can be
> > properly utilized within their respective modules.
>
> How? Please explain.
>
> This numbering looks sequential and arbitrary.
>
> What does PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO do differently such that it is not useful?
>
As far as I know, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO assigns dynamic IDs to devices,
but I need fixed IDs.
For example, the GPIO driver relies on these IDs to determine the
group, allowing the firmware to identify which GPIO group to operate
on through the API.
> >
> > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x2),
> > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x3),
> > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x4),
> > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x5),
> > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x6),
> > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x7),
> > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x8),
> > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x9),
> > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xA),
> > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xB),
> > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xC),
> > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xD),
> > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xE),
> > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xF),
Thanks,
Ming
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025, Ming Yu wrote:
> Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> 於 2025年3月20日 週四 下午10:50寫道:
> >
> ...
> > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
> > > >
> > > > IDs are usually given in base-10.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Fix it in v9.
> > >
> > > > Why are you manually adding the device IDs?
> > > >
> > > > PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO doesn't work for you?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I need to manage these IDs to ensure that child devices can be
> > > properly utilized within their respective modules.
> >
> > How? Please explain.
> >
> > This numbering looks sequential and arbitrary.
> >
> > What does PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO do differently such that it is not useful?
> >
>
> As far as I know, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO assigns dynamic IDs to devices,
> but I need fixed IDs.
> For example, the GPIO driver relies on these IDs to determine the
> group, allowing the firmware to identify which GPIO group to operate
> on through the API.
PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO will allocate IDs 0 through 16, the same as you've
done here. These lines do not have any differentiating attributes, so
either way we are not allocating specific IDs to specific pieces of the
H/W. I still do not understand why you need to allocate them manually.
> > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x2),
> > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x3),
> > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x4),
> > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x5),
> > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x6),
> > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x7),
> > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x8),
> > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x9),
> > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xA),
> > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xB),
> > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xC),
> > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xD),
> > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xE),
> > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0xF),
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ming
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> 於 2025年4月4日 週五 下午10:21寫道:
>
> > ...
> > > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
> > > > >
> > > > > IDs are usually given in base-10.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Fix it in v9.
> > > >
> > > > > Why are you manually adding the device IDs?
> > > > >
> > > > > PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO doesn't work for you?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I need to manage these IDs to ensure that child devices can be
> > > > properly utilized within their respective modules.
> > >
> > > How? Please explain.
> > >
> > > This numbering looks sequential and arbitrary.
> > >
> > > What does PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO do differently such that it is not useful?
> > >
> >
> > As far as I know, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO assigns dynamic IDs to devices,
> > but I need fixed IDs.
> > For example, the GPIO driver relies on these IDs to determine the
> > group, allowing the firmware to identify which GPIO group to operate
> > on through the API.
>
> PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO will allocate IDs 0 through 16, the same as you've
> done here. These lines do not have any differentiating attributes, so
> either way we are not allocating specific IDs to specific pieces of the
> H/W. I still do not understand why you need to allocate them manually.
>
I'm using PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO to allocate child device IDs with
MFD_CELL_NAME(), like this:
static const struct mfd_cell nct6694_dev[] = {
MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-gpio"),
MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-gpio"),
......
MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-gpio"),
MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-i2c"),
MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-i2c"),
......
MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-i2c"),
......
};
For example, the device IDs retrieved in gpio-nct6694.c is 1~16, and
i2c-nct6694.c is 17~22. Does this mean each driver should
independently handle its dynamically assigned IDs?
Additionally, I originally referred to cgbc-core.c with i2c-cgbc.c,
and ab8500-core.c with pwm-ab8500.c for associating child devices. Do
you think this approach is appropriate in my case?
Thanks,
Ming
On Mon, 07 Apr 2025, Ming Yu wrote:
> Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> 於 2025年4月4日 週五 下午10:21寫道:
> >
> > > ...
> > > > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
> > > > > >
> > > > > > IDs are usually given in base-10.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Fix it in v9.
> > > > >
> > > > > > Why are you manually adding the device IDs?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO doesn't work for you?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I need to manage these IDs to ensure that child devices can be
> > > > > properly utilized within their respective modules.
> > > >
> > > > How? Please explain.
> > > >
> > > > This numbering looks sequential and arbitrary.
> > > >
> > > > What does PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO do differently such that it is not useful?
> > > >
> > >
> > > As far as I know, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO assigns dynamic IDs to devices,
> > > but I need fixed IDs.
> > > For example, the GPIO driver relies on these IDs to determine the
> > > group, allowing the firmware to identify which GPIO group to operate
> > > on through the API.
> >
> > PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO will allocate IDs 0 through 16, the same as you've
> > done here. These lines do not have any differentiating attributes, so
> > either way we are not allocating specific IDs to specific pieces of the
> > H/W. I still do not understand why you need to allocate them manually.
> >
>
> I'm using PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO to allocate child device IDs with
> MFD_CELL_NAME(), like this:
>
> static const struct mfd_cell nct6694_dev[] = {
> MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-gpio"),
> MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-gpio"),
> ......
> MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-gpio"),
> MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-i2c"),
> MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-i2c"),
> ......
> MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-i2c"),
> ......
> };
>
> For example, the device IDs retrieved in gpio-nct6694.c is 1~16, and
> i2c-nct6694.c is 17~22. Does this mean each driver should
> independently handle its dynamically assigned IDs?
> Additionally, I originally referred to cgbc-core.c with i2c-cgbc.c,
> and ab8500-core.c with pwm-ab8500.c for associating child devices. Do
> you think this approach is appropriate in my case?
Yes, if you _need_ the ranges to start from 0, then you will have to
call mfd_add_devices() separately on those ranges. Otherwise one range
will follow directly on to another range.
But wait, you're using mfd_add_hotplug_devices(), which means you are
using PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO. So your .id values that you've added are
being ignored anyway. Thus, if you have tested that this works, you
don't need them anyway, right?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> 於 2025年4月10日 週四 下午4:21寫道:
>
> On Mon, 07 Apr 2025, Ming Yu wrote:
>
> > Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> 於 2025年4月4日 週五 下午10:21寫道:
> > >
> > > > ...
> > > > > > > > + MFD_CELL_BASIC("gpio-nct6694", NULL, NULL, 0, 0x1),
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > IDs are usually given in base-10.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Fix it in v9.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Why are you manually adding the device IDs?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO doesn't work for you?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I need to manage these IDs to ensure that child devices can be
> > > > > > properly utilized within their respective modules.
> > > > >
> > > > > How? Please explain.
> > > > >
> > > > > This numbering looks sequential and arbitrary.
> > > > >
> > > > > What does PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO do differently such that it is not useful?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > As far as I know, PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO assigns dynamic IDs to devices,
> > > > but I need fixed IDs.
> > > > For example, the GPIO driver relies on these IDs to determine the
> > > > group, allowing the firmware to identify which GPIO group to operate
> > > > on through the API.
> > >
> > > PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO will allocate IDs 0 through 16, the same as you've
> > > done here. These lines do not have any differentiating attributes, so
> > > either way we are not allocating specific IDs to specific pieces of the
> > > H/W. I still do not understand why you need to allocate them manually.
> > >
> >
> > I'm using PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO to allocate child device IDs with
> > MFD_CELL_NAME(), like this:
> >
> > static const struct mfd_cell nct6694_dev[] = {
> > MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-gpio"),
> > MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-gpio"),
> > ......
> > MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-gpio"),
> > MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-i2c"),
> > MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-i2c"),
> > ......
> > MFD_CELL_NAME("nct6694-i2c"),
> > ......
> > };
> >
> > For example, the device IDs retrieved in gpio-nct6694.c is 1~16, and
> > i2c-nct6694.c is 17~22. Does this mean each driver should
> > independently handle its dynamically assigned IDs?
> > Additionally, I originally referred to cgbc-core.c with i2c-cgbc.c,
> > and ab8500-core.c with pwm-ab8500.c for associating child devices. Do
> > you think this approach is appropriate in my case?
>
> Yes, if you _need_ the ranges to start from 0, then you will have to
> call mfd_add_devices() separately on those ranges. Otherwise one range
> will follow directly on to another range.
>
> But wait, you're using mfd_add_hotplug_devices(), which means you are
> using PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO. So your .id values that you've added are
> being ignored anyway. Thus, if you have tested that this works, you
> don't need them anyway, right?
>
Yes, it uses PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, but in my implementation, the
sub-devices use cell->id instead of platform_device->id, so it doesn't
affect the current behavior.
However, if you think there's a better approach or that this should be
changed for consistency or correctness, I'm happy to update it, please
let me know your recommendation.
Thanks,
Ming
On 25.02.2025 16:16:38, Ming Yu wrote:
[...]
> +static int nct6694_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *iface,
> + const struct usb_device_id *id)
> +{
> + struct usb_device *udev = interface_to_usbdev(iface);
> + struct usb_endpoint_descriptor *int_endpoint;
> + struct usb_host_interface *interface;
> + struct device *dev = &iface->dev;
> + struct nct6694 *nct6694;
> + int pipe, maxp;
> + int ret;
> +
> + nct6694 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*nct6694), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!nct6694)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + pipe = usb_rcvintpipe(udev, NCT6694_INT_IN_EP);
> + maxp = usb_maxpacket(udev, pipe);
> +
> + nct6694->usb_msg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(union nct6694_usb_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!nct6694->usb_msg)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + nct6694->int_buffer = devm_kzalloc(dev, maxp, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!nct6694->int_buffer)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + nct6694->int_in_urb = usb_alloc_urb(0, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!nct6694->int_in_urb)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + nct6694->domain = irq_domain_add_simple(NULL, NCT6694_NR_IRQS, 0,
> + &nct6694_irq_domain_ops,
> + nct6694);
> + if (!nct6694->domain) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_urb;
> + }
> +
> + nct6694->dev = dev;
> + nct6694->udev = udev;
> + nct6694->timeout = NCT6694_URB_TIMEOUT; /* Wait until URB completes */
Why do you need this variable? You can directly use NCT6694_URB_TIMEOUT
in the usb_bulk_msg() and friends calls.
regards,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
Dear Marc,
Thank you for reviewing,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> 於 2025年2月28日 週五 下午4:52寫道:
>
> > +static int nct6694_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *iface,
> > + const struct usb_device_id *id)
> > +{
> > + struct usb_device *udev = interface_to_usbdev(iface);
> > + struct usb_endpoint_descriptor *int_endpoint;
> > + struct usb_host_interface *interface;
> > + struct device *dev = &iface->dev;
> > + struct nct6694 *nct6694;
> > + int pipe, maxp;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + nct6694 = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*nct6694), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!nct6694)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + pipe = usb_rcvintpipe(udev, NCT6694_INT_IN_EP);
> > + maxp = usb_maxpacket(udev, pipe);
> > +
> > + nct6694->usb_msg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(union nct6694_usb_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!nct6694->usb_msg)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + nct6694->int_buffer = devm_kzalloc(dev, maxp, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!nct6694->int_buffer)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + nct6694->int_in_urb = usb_alloc_urb(0, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!nct6694->int_in_urb)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + nct6694->domain = irq_domain_add_simple(NULL, NCT6694_NR_IRQS, 0,
> > + &nct6694_irq_domain_ops,
> > + nct6694);
> > + if (!nct6694->domain) {
> > + ret = -ENODEV;
> > + goto err_urb;
> > + }
> > +
> > + nct6694->dev = dev;
> > + nct6694->udev = udev;
> > + nct6694->timeout = NCT6694_URB_TIMEOUT; /* Wait until URB completes */
>
> Why do you need this variable? You can directly use NCT6694_URB_TIMEOUT
> in the usb_bulk_msg() and friends calls.
>
Okay, I will make the modifications in the next patch.
Best regards,
Ming
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.