drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
When using kernel registered bvec fixed buffers, the "address" is
actually the offset into the bvec rather than userspace address.
Therefore it can be 0.
We can skip checking whether the address is NULL before mapping
uring_cmd data. Bad userspace address will be handled properly later when
the user buffer is imported.
With this patch, we will be able to use the kernel registered bvec fixed
buffers in io_uring NVMe passthru with ublk zero-copy support in
https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20250218224229.837848-1-kbusch@meta.com/T/#u.
Signed-off-by: Xinyu Zhang <xizhang@purestorage.com>
Reviewed-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
---
drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c b/drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c
index 60383da86feda..724ab542b4c33 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static int nvme_uring_cmd_io(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct nvme_ns *ns,
return PTR_ERR(req);
req->timeout = d.timeout_ms ? msecs_to_jiffies(d.timeout_ms) : 0;
- if (d.addr && d.data_len) {
+ if (d.data_len) {
ret = nvme_map_user_request(req, d.addr,
d.data_len, nvme_to_user_ptr(d.metadata),
d.metadata_len, 0, ioucmd, vec);
--
2.17.1
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 04:51:01PM -0700, Xinyu Zhang wrote: > When using kernel registered bvec fixed buffers, the "address" is > actually the offset into the bvec rather than userspace address. > Therefore it can be 0. How is that actually going to work? Who is interpreting that address?
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:33:51PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 04:51:01PM -0700, Xinyu Zhang wrote: > > When using kernel registered bvec fixed buffers, the "address" is > > actually the offset into the bvec rather than userspace address. > > Therefore it can be 0. > > How is that actually going to work? Who is interpreting that address? io_import_fixed() treats the address as an offset into its bio_vec.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 07:54:59AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:33:51PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 04:51:01PM -0700, Xinyu Zhang wrote: > > > When using kernel registered bvec fixed buffers, the "address" is > > > actually the offset into the bvec rather than userspace address. > > > Therefore it can be 0. > > > > How is that actually going to work? Who is interpreting that address? > > io_import_fixed() treats the address as an offset into its bio_vec. Ah, yes. This is in nvme_uring_data and read from the SQE. I thought we were further down.
On 2/20/25 4:51 PM, Xinyu Zhang wrote:
> When using kernel registered bvec fixed buffers, the "address" is
> actually the offset into the bvec rather than userspace address.
> Therefore it can be 0.
> We can skip checking whether the address is NULL before mapping
> uring_cmd data. Bad userspace address will be handled properly later when
> the user buffer is imported.
> With this patch, we will be able to use the kernel registered bvec fixed
> buffers in io_uring NVMe passthru with ublk zero-copy support in
> https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20250218224229.837848-1-kbusch@meta.com/T/#u.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xinyu Zhang <xizhang@purestorage.com>
> Reviewed-by: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c b/drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c
> index 60383da86feda..724ab542b4c33 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/ioctl.c
> @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static int nvme_uring_cmd_io(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct nvme_ns *ns,
> return PTR_ERR(req);
> req->timeout = d.timeout_ms ? msecs_to_jiffies(d.timeout_ms) : 0;
>
> - if (d.addr && d.data_len) {
> + if (d.data_len) {
> ret = nvme_map_user_request(req, d.addr,
> d.data_len, nvme_to_user_ptr(d.metadata),
> d.metadata_len, 0, ioucmd, vec);
Looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
--
Jens Axboe
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 04:51:01PM -0700, Xinyu Zhang wrote: > When using kernel registered bvec fixed buffers, the "address" is > actually the offset into the bvec rather than userspace address. > Therefore it can be 0. Nice, thanks for catching this. I'm prepping a new ublk-zc version based on previous feedback. I'll add this into the series once its ready, and I'm hoping by tomorrow.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.