drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c | 15 +++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
In r420_cp_errata_init(), the RESYNC information is stored even
when the Scratch register is not correctly allocated.
Change the return type of r420_cp_errata_init() from void to int
to propagate errors to the caller. Add error checking after
radeon_scratch_get() to ensure RESYNC information is stored
to an allocated address. Log an error message and return the
error code immediately when radeon_scratch_get() fails.
Additionally, handle the return value of r420_cp_errata_init() in
r420_startup() to log an appropriate error message and propagate
the error if initialization fails.
Fixes: 62cdc0c20663 ("drm/radeon/kms: Workaround RV410/R420 CP errata (V3)")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.33+
Signed-off-by: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c | 15 +++++++++++----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c
index 9a31cdec6415..67c55153cba8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static void r420_clock_resume(struct radeon_device *rdev)
WREG32_PLL(R_00000D_SCLK_CNTL, sclk_cntl);
}
-static void r420_cp_errata_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
+static int r420_cp_errata_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
{
int r;
struct radeon_ring *ring = &rdev->ring[RADEON_RING_TYPE_GFX_INDEX];
@@ -215,7 +215,11 @@ static void r420_cp_errata_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
* The proper workaround is to queue a RESYNC at the beginning
* of the CP init, apparently.
*/
- radeon_scratch_get(rdev, &rdev->config.r300.resync_scratch);
+ r = radeon_scratch_get(rdev, &rdev->config.r300.resync_scratch);
+ if (r) {
+ DRM_ERROR("failed to get scratch reg (%d).\n", r);
+ return r;
+ }
r = radeon_ring_lock(rdev, ring, 8);
WARN_ON(r);
radeon_ring_write(ring, PACKET0(R300_CP_RESYNC_ADDR, 1));
@@ -290,8 +294,11 @@ static int r420_startup(struct radeon_device *rdev)
dev_err(rdev->dev, "failed initializing CP (%d).\n", r);
return r;
}
- r420_cp_errata_init(rdev);
-
+ r = r420_cp_errata_init(rdev);
+ if (r) {
+ dev_err(rdev->dev, "failed initializing CP errata workaround (%d).\n", r);
+ return r;
+ }
r = radeon_ib_pool_init(rdev);
if (r) {
dev_err(rdev->dev, "IB initialization failed (%d).\n", r);
--
2.42.0.windows.2
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 1:41 AM Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
>
> In r420_cp_errata_init(), the RESYNC information is stored even
> when the Scratch register is not correctly allocated.
>
> Change the return type of r420_cp_errata_init() from void to int
> to propagate errors to the caller. Add error checking after
> radeon_scratch_get() to ensure RESYNC information is stored
> to an allocated address. Log an error message and return the
> error code immediately when radeon_scratch_get() fails.
> Additionally, handle the return value of r420_cp_errata_init() in
> r420_startup() to log an appropriate error message and propagate
> the error if initialization fails.
>
> Fixes: 62cdc0c20663 ("drm/radeon/kms: Workaround RV410/R420 CP errata (V3)")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.33+
> Signed-off-by: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c
> index 9a31cdec6415..67c55153cba8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c
> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static void r420_clock_resume(struct radeon_device *rdev)
> WREG32_PLL(R_00000D_SCLK_CNTL, sclk_cntl);
> }
>
> -static void r420_cp_errata_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
> +static int r420_cp_errata_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
You changed the function signature, but you didn't adjust the function
behavior to match.
Alex
> {
> int r;
> struct radeon_ring *ring = &rdev->ring[RADEON_RING_TYPE_GFX_INDEX];
> @@ -215,7 +215,11 @@ static void r420_cp_errata_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
> * The proper workaround is to queue a RESYNC at the beginning
> * of the CP init, apparently.
> */
> - radeon_scratch_get(rdev, &rdev->config.r300.resync_scratch);
> + r = radeon_scratch_get(rdev, &rdev->config.r300.resync_scratch);
> + if (r) {
> + DRM_ERROR("failed to get scratch reg (%d).\n", r);
> + return r;
> + }
> r = radeon_ring_lock(rdev, ring, 8);
> WARN_ON(r);
> radeon_ring_write(ring, PACKET0(R300_CP_RESYNC_ADDR, 1));
> @@ -290,8 +294,11 @@ static int r420_startup(struct radeon_device *rdev)
> dev_err(rdev->dev, "failed initializing CP (%d).\n", r);
> return r;
> }
> - r420_cp_errata_init(rdev);
> -
> + r = r420_cp_errata_init(rdev);
> + if (r) {
> + dev_err(rdev->dev, "failed initializing CP errata workaround (%d).\n", r);
> + return r;
> + }
> r = radeon_ib_pool_init(rdev);
> if (r) {
> dev_err(rdev->dev, "IB initialization failed (%d).\n", r);
> --
> 2.42.0.windows.2
>
Hi Wentao,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on drm-exynos/exynos-drm-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.14-rc3 next-20250220]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wentao-Liang/drm-radeon-Add-error-handlings-for-r420-cp-errata-initiation/20250220-144327
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/daeinki/drm-exynos.git exynos-drm-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250220064050.686-1-vulab%40iscas.ac.cn
patch subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Add error handlings for r420 cp errata initiation
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-005-20250221 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250221/202502211718.EFZaW3pW-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250221/202502211718.EFZaW3pW-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502211718.EFZaW3pW-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c:229:1: warning: non-void function does not return a value in all control paths [-Wreturn-type]
229 | }
| ^
1 warning generated.
vim +229 drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r420.c
9f022ddfb23793 Jerome Glisse 2009-09-11 206
fe881d3e554a1f Wentao Liang 2025-02-20 207 static int r420_cp_errata_init(struct radeon_device *rdev)
62cdc0c20663ef Corbin Simpson 2010-01-06 208 {
c346fb74fb6463 Pan Bian 2017-04-24 209 int r;
e32eb50dbe4386 Christian König 2011-10-23 210 struct radeon_ring *ring = &rdev->ring[RADEON_RING_TYPE_GFX_INDEX];
7b1f2485db253a Christian König 2011-09-23 211
62cdc0c20663ef Corbin Simpson 2010-01-06 212 /* RV410 and R420 can lock up if CP DMA to host memory happens
62cdc0c20663ef Corbin Simpson 2010-01-06 213 * while the 2D engine is busy.
62cdc0c20663ef Corbin Simpson 2010-01-06 214 *
62cdc0c20663ef Corbin Simpson 2010-01-06 215 * The proper workaround is to queue a RESYNC at the beginning
62cdc0c20663ef Corbin Simpson 2010-01-06 216 * of the CP init, apparently.
62cdc0c20663ef Corbin Simpson 2010-01-06 217 */
fe881d3e554a1f Wentao Liang 2025-02-20 218 r = radeon_scratch_get(rdev, &rdev->config.r300.resync_scratch);
fe881d3e554a1f Wentao Liang 2025-02-20 219 if (r) {
fe881d3e554a1f Wentao Liang 2025-02-20 220 DRM_ERROR("failed to get scratch reg (%d).\n", r);
fe881d3e554a1f Wentao Liang 2025-02-20 221 return r;
fe881d3e554a1f Wentao Liang 2025-02-20 222 }
c346fb74fb6463 Pan Bian 2017-04-24 223 r = radeon_ring_lock(rdev, ring, 8);
c346fb74fb6463 Pan Bian 2017-04-24 224 WARN_ON(r);
e32eb50dbe4386 Christian König 2011-10-23 225 radeon_ring_write(ring, PACKET0(R300_CP_RESYNC_ADDR, 1));
e32eb50dbe4386 Christian König 2011-10-23 226 radeon_ring_write(ring, rdev->config.r300.resync_scratch);
e32eb50dbe4386 Christian König 2011-10-23 227 radeon_ring_write(ring, 0xDEADBEEF);
1538a9e0e04f6a Michel Dänzer 2014-08-18 228 radeon_ring_unlock_commit(rdev, ring, false);
62cdc0c20663ef Corbin Simpson 2010-01-06 @229 }
62cdc0c20663ef Corbin Simpson 2010-01-06 230
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.