[PATCH] docs: scheduler: fix spelling in sched-bwc documentation

Suchit Karunakaran posted 1 patch 10 months ago
Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] docs: scheduler: fix spelling in sched-bwc documentation
Posted by Suchit Karunakaran 10 months ago
Fix spelling of "interference" in the CFS bandwidth control documentation. 
The word was misspelled as "interferenece".

Signed-off-by: Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
index 41ed2ceafc92..e881a945c188 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ At the same time, we can say that the worst case deadline miss, will be
 \Sum e_i; that is, there is a bounded tardiness (under the assumption
 that x+e is indeed WCET).
 
-The interferenece when using burst is valued by the possibilities for
+The interference when using burst is valued by the possibilities for
 missing the deadline and the average WCET. Test results showed that when
 there many cgroups or CPU is under utilized, the interference is
 limited. More details are shown in:
-- 
2.48.1
Re: [PATCH] docs: scheduler: fix spelling in sched-bwc documentation
Posted by Jonathan Corbet 10 months ago
Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com> writes:

> Fix spelling of "interference" in the CFS bandwidth control documentation. 
> The word was misspelled as "interferenece".
>
> Signed-off-by: Suchit Karunakaran <suchitkarunakaran@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
> index 41ed2ceafc92..e881a945c188 100644
> --- a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-bwc.rst
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ At the same time, we can say that the worst case deadline miss, will be
>  \Sum e_i; that is, there is a bounded tardiness (under the assumption
>  that x+e is indeed WCET).
>  
> -The interferenece when using burst is valued by the possibilities for
> +The interference when using burst is valued by the possibilities for
>  missing the deadline and the average WCET. Test results showed that when

Applied, thanks.

jon