[PATCH v4] firmware: smccc: Support optional Arm SMC SOC_ID name

Paul Benoit posted 1 patch 10 months ago
drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/arm-smccc.h       | 40 ++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
[PATCH v4] firmware: smccc: Support optional Arm SMC SOC_ID name
Posted by Paul Benoit 10 months ago
Issue Number 1.6 of the Arm SMC Calling Convention introduces an optional
SOC_ID name string.  If implemented, point the 'machine' field of the SoC
Device Attributes at this string so that it will appear under
/sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/machine.

On Arm SMC compliant SoCs, this will allow things like 'lscpu' to
eventually get a SoC provider model name from there rather than each
tool/utility needing to get a possibly inconsistent, obsolete, or incorrect
model/machine name from its own hardcoded model/machine name table.

Signed-off-by: Paul Benoit <paul@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
---

v3->v4: Address code review identified issues of v3.
v2->v3: Add conditionalization to exclude SOC_ID Name from 32-bit builds.
v1->v2: Address code review identified issues.

 drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/arm-smccc.h       | 40 ++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 121 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c b/drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c
index 1990263fbba0..7b0688d78dab 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c
@@ -32,6 +32,86 @@
 static struct soc_device *soc_dev;
 static struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
+
+static char __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_name[136] = "";
+
+static inline void str_fragment_from_reg(char *dst, unsigned long reg)
+{
+	dst[0] = (reg >> 0)  & 0xff;
+	dst[1] = (reg >> 8)  & 0xff;
+	dst[2] = (reg >> 16) & 0xff;
+	dst[3] = (reg >> 24) & 0xff;
+	dst[4] = (reg >> 32) & 0xff;
+	dst[5] = (reg >> 40) & 0xff;
+	dst[6] = (reg >> 48) & 0xff;
+	dst[7] = (reg >> 56) & 0xff;
+}
+
+static char __init *smccc_soc_name_init(void)
+{
+	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args;
+	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res;
+	size_t len;
+
+	/*
+	 * Issue Number 1.6 of the Arm SMC Calling Convention
+	 * specification introduces an optional "name" string
+	 * to the ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_SOC_ID function.  Fetch it if
+	 * available.
+	 */
+	args.a0 = ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_SOC_ID;
+	args.a1 = 2;    /* SOC_ID name */
+	arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(&args, &res);
+	if ((u32)res.a0 == 0) {
+		const unsigned int regsize = sizeof(res.a1);
+
+		/*
+		 * Copy res.a1..res.a17 to the smccc_soc_id_name string
+		 * 8 bytes at a time.  As per Issue 1.6 of the Arm SMC
+		 * Calling Convention, the string will be NUL terminated
+		 * and padded, from the end of the string to the end of the
+		 * 136 byte buffer, with NULs.
+		 */
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 0*regsize, res.a1);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 1*regsize, res.a2);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 2*regsize, res.a3);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 3*regsize, res.a4);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 4*regsize, res.a5);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 5*regsize, res.a6);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 6*regsize, res.a7);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 7*regsize, res.a8);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8*regsize, res.a9);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 9*regsize, res.a10);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 10*regsize, res.a11);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 11*regsize, res.a12);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 12*regsize, res.a13);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 13*regsize, res.a14);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 14*regsize, res.a15);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 15*regsize, res.a16);
+		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 16*regsize, res.a17);
+
+		len = strnlen(smccc_soc_id_name, sizeof(smccc_soc_id_name));
+		if (len) {
+			if (len == sizeof(smccc_soc_id_name))
+				pr_warn(FW_BUG "Ignoring improperly formatted Name\n");
+			else
+				return smccc_soc_id_name;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+#else
+
+static char __init *smccc_soc_name_init(void)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+#endif
+
 static int __init smccc_soc_init(void)
 {
 	int soc_id_rev, soc_id_version;
@@ -72,6 +152,7 @@ static int __init smccc_soc_init(void)
 	soc_dev_attr->soc_id = soc_id_str;
 	soc_dev_attr->revision = soc_id_rev_str;
 	soc_dev_attr->family = soc_id_jep106_id_str;
+	soc_dev_attr->machine = smccc_soc_name_init();
 
 	soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
 	if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
diff --git a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
index 67f6fdf2e7cd..eb7eab04755a 100644
--- a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
+++ b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
@@ -639,5 +639,45 @@ asmlinkage void __arm_smccc_hvc(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1,
 		method;							\
 	})
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
+
+#define __fail_smccc_1_2(___res)					\
+	do {								\
+		if (___res)						\
+			___res->a0 = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;		\
+	} while (0)
+
+/*
+ * arm_smccc_1_2_invoke() - make an SMCCC v1.2 compliant call
+ *
+ * @args: SMC args are in the a0..a17 fields of the arm_smcc_1_2_regs structure
+ * @res: result values from registers 0 to 17
+ *
+ * This macro will make either an HVC call or an SMC call depending on the
+ * current SMCCC conduit. If no valid conduit is available then -1
+ * (SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED) is returned in @res.a0 (if supplied).
+ *
+ * The return value also provides the conduit that was used.
+ */
+#define arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(args, res) ({				\
+		struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *__args = args;		\
+		struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *__res = res;			\
+		int method = arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit();		\
+		switch (method) {					\
+		case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:					\
+			arm_smccc_1_2_hvc(__args, __res);		\
+			break;						\
+		case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:					\
+			arm_smccc_1_2_smc(__args, __res);		\
+			break;						\
+		default:						\
+			__fail_smccc_1_2(__res);			\
+			method = SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE;			\
+			break;						\
+		}							\
+		method;							\
+	})
+#endif /*CONFIG_ARM64*/
+
 #endif /*__ASSEMBLY__*/
 #endif /*__LINUX_ARM_SMCCC_H*/
-- 
2.48.1
Re: [PATCH v4] firmware: smccc: Support optional Arm SMC SOC_ID name
Posted by Sudeep Holla 9 months, 2 weeks ago
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:59:32 -0800, Paul Benoit wrote:
> Issue Number 1.6 of the Arm SMC Calling Convention introduces an optional
> SOC_ID name string.  If implemented, point the 'machine' field of the SoC
> Device Attributes at this string so that it will appear under
> /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/machine.
>
> On Arm SMC compliant SoCs, this will allow things like 'lscpu' to
> eventually get a SoC provider model name from there rather than each
> tool/utility needing to get a possibly inconsistent, obsolete, or incorrect
> model/machine name from its own hardcoded model/machine name table.
>
> [...]

Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-linux-next), thanks!

[1/1] firmware: smccc: Support optional Arm SMC SOC_ID name
      https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/5f9c23abc477
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Re: [PATCH v4] firmware: smccc: Support optional Arm SMC SOC_ID name
Posted by Mark Rutland 9 months, 2 weeks ago
Hi Paul,

This looks generally good with a couple of minor nits.

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 04:59:32PM -0800, Paul Benoit wrote:
> Issue Number 1.6 of the Arm SMC Calling Convention introduces an optional
> SOC_ID name string.  If implemented, point the 'machine' field of the SoC
> Device Attributes at this string so that it will appear under
> /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/machine.
> 
> On Arm SMC compliant SoCs, this will allow things like 'lscpu' to
> eventually get a SoC provider model name from there rather than each
> tool/utility needing to get a possibly inconsistent, obsolete, or incorrect
> model/machine name from its own hardcoded model/machine name table.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Benoit <paul@os.amperecomputing.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> ---
> 
> v3->v4: Address code review identified issues of v3.
> v2->v3: Add conditionalization to exclude SOC_ID Name from 32-bit builds.
> v1->v2: Address code review identified issues.
> 
>  drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/arm-smccc.h       | 40 ++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 121 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c b/drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c
> index 1990263fbba0..7b0688d78dab 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/soc_id.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,86 @@
>  static struct soc_device *soc_dev;
>  static struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> +
> +static char __ro_after_init smccc_soc_id_name[136] = "";
> +
> +static inline void str_fragment_from_reg(char *dst, unsigned long reg)
> +{
> +	dst[0] = (reg >> 0)  & 0xff;
> +	dst[1] = (reg >> 8)  & 0xff;
> +	dst[2] = (reg >> 16) & 0xff;
> +	dst[3] = (reg >> 24) & 0xff;
> +	dst[4] = (reg >> 32) & 0xff;
> +	dst[5] = (reg >> 40) & 0xff;
> +	dst[6] = (reg >> 48) & 0xff;
> +	dst[7] = (reg >> 56) & 0xff;
> +}
> +
> +static char __init *smccc_soc_name_init(void)
> +{
> +	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args;
> +	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res;
> +	size_t len;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Issue Number 1.6 of the Arm SMC Calling Convention
> +	 * specification introduces an optional "name" string
> +	 * to the ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_SOC_ID function.  Fetch it if
> +	 * available.
> +	 */
> +	args.a0 = ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_SOC_ID;
> +	args.a1 = 2;    /* SOC_ID name */
> +	arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(&args, &res);
> +	if ((u32)res.a0 == 0) {
> +		const unsigned int regsize = sizeof(res.a1);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Copy res.a1..res.a17 to the smccc_soc_id_name string
> +		 * 8 bytes at a time.  As per Issue 1.6 of the Arm SMC
> +		 * Calling Convention, the string will be NUL terminated
> +		 * and padded, from the end of the string to the end of the
> +		 * 136 byte buffer, with NULs.
> +		 */
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 0*regsize, res.a1);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 1*regsize, res.a2);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 2*regsize, res.a3);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 3*regsize, res.a4);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 4*regsize, res.a5);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 5*regsize, res.a6);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 6*regsize, res.a7);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 7*regsize, res.a8);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8*regsize, res.a9);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 9*regsize, res.a10);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 10*regsize, res.a11);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 11*regsize, res.a12);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 12*regsize, res.a13);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 13*regsize, res.a14);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 14*regsize, res.a15);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 15*regsize, res.a16);
> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 16*regsize, res.a17);

Please get rid of 'regsize' and use '8' directly. This only exists for
arm64, where the registeres are 8 bytes, and the comment immediately
above refers to "8 bytes" specifically anyway, so 'regsize' only serves
to make this harder to read.

It'd be a bit clearer as:

	str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8 * 0,  res.a1);
	str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8 * 1,  res.a2);
	...
	str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8 * 15, res.a16);
	str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8 * 16, res.a17);

Sudeep, are you happy to fix that up when applying?

> +
> +		len = strnlen(smccc_soc_id_name, sizeof(smccc_soc_id_name));
> +		if (len) {
> +			if (len == sizeof(smccc_soc_id_name))
> +				pr_warn(FW_BUG "Ignoring improperly formatted Name\n");

It's odd that 'Name' is capitalized here. Not a big deal, but it doesn't
look quite right.

> +			else
> +				return smccc_soc_id_name;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +#else
> +
> +static char __init *smccc_soc_name_init(void)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> +
>  static int __init smccc_soc_init(void)
>  {
>  	int soc_id_rev, soc_id_version;
> @@ -72,6 +152,7 @@ static int __init smccc_soc_init(void)
>  	soc_dev_attr->soc_id = soc_id_str;
>  	soc_dev_attr->revision = soc_id_rev_str;
>  	soc_dev_attr->family = soc_id_jep106_id_str;
> +	soc_dev_attr->machine = smccc_soc_name_init();
>  
>  	soc_dev = soc_device_register(soc_dev_attr);
>  	if (IS_ERR(soc_dev)) {
> diff --git a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> index 67f6fdf2e7cd..eb7eab04755a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> @@ -639,5 +639,45 @@ asmlinkage void __arm_smccc_hvc(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1,
>  		method;							\
>  	})
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> +
> +#define __fail_smccc_1_2(___res)					\
> +	do {								\
> +		if (___res)						\
> +			___res->a0 = SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED;		\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +/*
> + * arm_smccc_1_2_invoke() - make an SMCCC v1.2 compliant call
> + *
> + * @args: SMC args are in the a0..a17 fields of the arm_smcc_1_2_regs structure
> + * @res: result values from registers 0 to 17
> + *
> + * This macro will make either an HVC call or an SMC call depending on the
> + * current SMCCC conduit. If no valid conduit is available then -1
> + * (SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED) is returned in @res.a0 (if supplied).
> + *
> + * The return value also provides the conduit that was used.
> + */
> +#define arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(args, res) ({				\
> +		struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *__args = args;		\
> +		struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *__res = res;			\
> +		int method = arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit();		\
> +		switch (method) {					\
> +		case SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC:					\
> +			arm_smccc_1_2_hvc(__args, __res);		\
> +			break;						\
> +		case SMCCC_CONDUIT_SMC:					\
> +			arm_smccc_1_2_smc(__args, __res);		\
> +			break;						\
> +		default:						\
> +			__fail_smccc_1_2(__res);			\
> +			method = SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE;			\
> +			break;						\
> +		}							\
> +		method;							\
> +	})
> +#endif /*CONFIG_ARM64*/

At some point I intend to rework the existing helpers to not return the
conduit, but this is fine for now.

With the fixups above:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> +
>  #endif /*__ASSEMBLY__*/
>  #endif /*__LINUX_ARM_SMCCC_H*/
> -- 
> 2.48.1
>
Re: [PATCH v4] firmware: smccc: Support optional Arm SMC SOC_ID name
Posted by Sudeep Holla 9 months, 2 weeks ago
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 02:18:05PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> This looks generally good with a couple of minor nits.
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 04:59:32PM -0800, Paul Benoit wrote:
> > Issue Number 1.6 of the Arm SMC Calling Convention introduces an optional
> > SOC_ID name string.  If implemented, point the 'machine' field of the SoC
> > Device Attributes at this string so that it will appear under
> > /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/machine.
> >
> > On Arm SMC compliant SoCs, this will allow things like 'lscpu' to
> > eventually get a SoC provider model name from there rather than each
> > tool/utility needing to get a possibly inconsistent, obsolete, or incorrect
> > model/machine name from its own hardcoded model/machine name table.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Benoit <paul@os.amperecomputing.com>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > ---

[...]

> > +static char __init *smccc_soc_name_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args;
> > +	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res;
> > +	size_t len;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Issue Number 1.6 of the Arm SMC Calling Convention
> > +	 * specification introduces an optional "name" string
> > +	 * to the ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_SOC_ID function.  Fetch it if
> > +	 * available.
> > +	 */
> > +	args.a0 = ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_SOC_ID;
> > +	args.a1 = 2;    /* SOC_ID name */
> > +	arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(&args, &res);
> > +	if ((u32)res.a0 == 0) {
> > +		const unsigned int regsize = sizeof(res.a1);
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Copy res.a1..res.a17 to the smccc_soc_id_name string
> > +		 * 8 bytes at a time.  As per Issue 1.6 of the Arm SMC
> > +		 * Calling Convention, the string will be NUL terminated
> > +		 * and padded, from the end of the string to the end of the
> > +		 * 136 byte buffer, with NULs.
> > +		 */
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 0*regsize, res.a1);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 1*regsize, res.a2);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 2*regsize, res.a3);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 3*regsize, res.a4);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 4*regsize, res.a5);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 5*regsize, res.a6);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 6*regsize, res.a7);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 7*regsize, res.a8);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8*regsize, res.a9);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 9*regsize, res.a10);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 10*regsize, res.a11);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 11*regsize, res.a12);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 12*regsize, res.a13);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 13*regsize, res.a14);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 14*regsize, res.a15);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 15*regsize, res.a16);
> > +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 16*regsize, res.a17);
> 
> Please get rid of 'regsize' and use '8' directly. This only exists for
> arm64, where the registeres are 8 bytes, and the comment immediately
> above refers to "8 bytes" specifically anyway, so 'regsize' only serves
> to make this harder to read.
> 
> It'd be a bit clearer as:
> 
> 	str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8 * 0,  res.a1);
> 	str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8 * 1,  res.a2);
> 	...
> 	str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8 * 15, res.a16);
> 	str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8 * 16, res.a17);
> 
> Sudeep, are you happy to fix that up when applying?
> 
> > +
> > +		len = strnlen(smccc_soc_id_name, sizeof(smccc_soc_id_name));
> > +		if (len) {
> > +			if (len == sizeof(smccc_soc_id_name))
> > +				pr_warn(FW_BUG "Ignoring improperly formatted Name\n");
> 
> It's odd that 'Name' is capitalized here. Not a big deal, but it doesn't
> look quite right.
>

I can fix both of these and apply. No need to repost.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep
Re: [PATCH v4] firmware: smccc: Support optional Arm SMC SOC_ID name
Posted by Paul Benoit 9 months, 2 weeks ago
Thank you Sudeep and Mark.

On 3/3/2025 9:45 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 02:18:05PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> This looks generally good with a couple of minor nits.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 04:59:32PM -0800, Paul Benoit wrote:
>>> Issue Number 1.6 of the Arm SMC Calling Convention introduces an optional
>>> SOC_ID name string.  If implemented, point the 'machine' field of the SoC
>>> Device Attributes at this string so that it will appear under
>>> /sys/bus/soc/devices/soc0/machine.
>>>
>>> On Arm SMC compliant SoCs, this will allow things like 'lscpu' to
>>> eventually get a SoC provider model name from there rather than each
>>> tool/utility needing to get a possibly inconsistent, obsolete, or incorrect
>>> model/machine name from its own hardcoded model/machine name table.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Benoit <paul@os.amperecomputing.com>
>>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>> ---
> 
> [...]
> 
>>> +static char __init *smccc_soc_name_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs args;
>>> +	struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs res;
>>> +	size_t len;
>>> +
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Issue Number 1.6 of the Arm SMC Calling Convention
>>> +	 * specification introduces an optional "name" string
>>> +	 * to the ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_SOC_ID function.  Fetch it if
>>> +	 * available.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	args.a0 = ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_SOC_ID;
>>> +	args.a1 = 2;    /* SOC_ID name */
>>> +	arm_smccc_1_2_invoke(&args, &res);
>>> +	if ((u32)res.a0 == 0) {
>>> +		const unsigned int regsize = sizeof(res.a1);
>>> +
>>> +		/*
>>> +		 * Copy res.a1..res.a17 to the smccc_soc_id_name string
>>> +		 * 8 bytes at a time.  As per Issue 1.6 of the Arm SMC
>>> +		 * Calling Convention, the string will be NUL terminated
>>> +		 * and padded, from the end of the string to the end of the
>>> +		 * 136 byte buffer, with NULs.
>>> +		 */
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 0*regsize, res.a1);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 1*regsize, res.a2);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 2*regsize, res.a3);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 3*regsize, res.a4);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 4*regsize, res.a5);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 5*regsize, res.a6);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 6*regsize, res.a7);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 7*regsize, res.a8);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8*regsize, res.a9);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 9*regsize, res.a10);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 10*regsize, res.a11);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 11*regsize, res.a12);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 12*regsize, res.a13);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 13*regsize, res.a14);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 14*regsize, res.a15);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 15*regsize, res.a16);
>>> +		str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 16*regsize, res.a17);
>>
>> Please get rid of 'regsize' and use '8' directly. This only exists for
>> arm64, where the registeres are 8 bytes, and the comment immediately
>> above refers to "8 bytes" specifically anyway, so 'regsize' only serves
>> to make this harder to read.
>>
>> It'd be a bit clearer as:
>>
>> 	str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8 * 0,  res.a1);
>> 	str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8 * 1,  res.a2);
>> 	...
>> 	str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8 * 15, res.a16);
>> 	str_fragment_from_reg(smccc_soc_id_name + 8 * 16, res.a17);
>>
>> Sudeep, are you happy to fix that up when applying?
>>
>>> +
>>> +		len = strnlen(smccc_soc_id_name, sizeof(smccc_soc_id_name));
>>> +		if (len) {
>>> +			if (len == sizeof(smccc_soc_id_name))
>>> +				pr_warn(FW_BUG "Ignoring improperly formatted Name\n");
>>
>> It's odd that 'Name' is capitalized here. Not a big deal, but it doesn't
>> look quite right.
>>
> 
> I can fix both of these and apply. No need to repost.
>