Enable PCIe endpoint support for the Qualcomm SAR2130P platform.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
index c08f64d7a825fa5da22976c8020f96ee5faa5462..dec5675c7c9d52b77f084ae139845b488fa02d2c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
@@ -933,6 +933,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_ep_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-pcie-ep", .data = &cfg_1_34_0},
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdx55-pcie-ep", },
 	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-pcie-ep", },
+	{ .compatible = "qcom,sar2130p-pcie-ep", },
 	{ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_pcie_ep_match);

-- 
2.39.5

On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 08:56:16PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Enable PCIe endpoint support for the Qualcomm SAR2130P platform.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> index c08f64d7a825fa5da22976c8020f96ee5faa5462..dec5675c7c9d52b77f084ae139845b488fa02d2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> @@ -933,6 +933,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_ep_match[] = {
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-pcie-ep", .data = &cfg_1_34_0},
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdx55-pcie-ep", },
>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-pcie-ep", },
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sar2130p-pcie-ep", },

Could you please use a fallback? I'd prefer to not add compatible to the driver
unless it requires special config.

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 12:53:10PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 08:56:16PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Enable PCIe endpoint support for the Qualcomm SAR2130P platform.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> > index c08f64d7a825fa5da22976c8020f96ee5faa5462..dec5675c7c9d52b77f084ae139845b488fa02d2c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> > @@ -933,6 +933,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_ep_match[] = {
> >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-pcie-ep", .data = &cfg_1_34_0},
> >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdx55-pcie-ep", },
> >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-pcie-ep", },
> > +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sar2130p-pcie-ep", },
> 
> Could you please use a fallback? I'd prefer to not add compatible to the driver
> unless it requires special config.

This is a tough question, I have been thinking about it too. But granted
the differences in clocks used by the controller I opted to use
different compat strings without a fallback. I think it would be hard to
describe the schema otherwise.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

On 20.02.2025 11:50 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 12:53:10PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 08:56:16PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> Enable PCIe endpoint support for the Qualcomm SAR2130P platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
>>> index c08f64d7a825fa5da22976c8020f96ee5faa5462..dec5675c7c9d52b77f084ae139845b488fa02d2c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
>>> @@ -933,6 +933,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_ep_match[] = {
>>>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-pcie-ep", .data = &cfg_1_34_0},
>>>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdx55-pcie-ep", },
>>>  	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-pcie-ep", },
>>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sar2130p-pcie-ep", },
>>
>> Could you please use a fallback? I'd prefer to not add compatible to the driver
>> unless it requires special config.
> 
> This is a tough question, I have been thinking about it too. But granted
> the differences in clocks used by the controller I opted to use
> different compat strings without a fallback. I think it would be hard to
> describe the schema otherwise.

You could use if-else ordering or is: instead of contains: but I don't mind

Konrad