[PATCH v2 4/8] pinctrl: sunxi: support moved power configuration registers

Andre Przywara posted 8 patches 10 months, 1 week ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v2 4/8] pinctrl: sunxi: support moved power configuration registers
Posted by Andre Przywara 10 months, 1 week ago
The Allwinner pincontroller IP features some registers to control the
withstand voltage of each pin group. So far those registers were always
located at the same offset, but the A523 SoC has moved them (probably to
accommodate all eleven pin banks).

Add a flag to note this feature, and use that to program the registers
either at offset 0x340 or 0x380. So far no pincontroller driver uses
this flag, but we need it for the upcoming A523 support.

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h |  7 +++++--
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
index 83a031ceb29f2..a1057122272bd 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
@@ -736,9 +736,9 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_set_io_bias_cfg(struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl,
 		val = uV > 1800000 && uV <= 2500000 ? BIT(bank) : 0;
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctl->lock, flags);
-		reg = readl(pctl->membase + PIO_POW_MOD_CTL_REG);
+		reg = readl(pctl->membase + pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset);
 		reg &= ~BIT(bank);
-		writel(reg | val, pctl->membase + PIO_POW_MOD_CTL_REG);
+		writel(reg | val, pctl->membase + pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset);
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctl->lock, flags);
 
 		fallthrough;
@@ -746,9 +746,12 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_set_io_bias_cfg(struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl,
 		val = uV <= 1800000 ? 1 : 0;
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctl->lock, flags);
-		reg = readl(pctl->membase + PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_REG);
+		reg = readl(pctl->membase + pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset +
+			    PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_OFS);
 		reg &= ~(1 << bank);
-		writel(reg | val << bank, pctl->membase + PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_REG);
+		writel(reg | val << bank,
+		       pctl->membase + pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset +
+		       PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_OFS);
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctl->lock, flags);
 		return 0;
 	default:
@@ -1520,6 +1523,10 @@ int sunxi_pinctrl_init_with_flags(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		pctl->pull_regs_offset = PULL_REGS_OFFSET;
 		pctl->dlevel_field_width = DLEVEL_FIELD_WIDTH;
 	}
+	if (flags & SUNXI_PINCTRL_ELEVEN_BANKS)
+		pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset = PIO_11B_POW_MOD_SEL_REG;
+	else
+		pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset = PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_REG;
 
 	pctl->irq_array = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev,
 				       IRQ_PER_BANK * pctl->desc->irq_banks,
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h
index 6cf721876d89d..a93385e456a57 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h
@@ -87,9 +87,11 @@
 #define SUNXI_PINCTRL_VARIANT_MASK	GENMASK(7, 0)
 #define SUNXI_PINCTRL_NEW_REG_LAYOUT	BIT(8)
 #define SUNXI_PINCTRL_PORTF_SWITCH	BIT(9)
+#define SUNXI_PINCTRL_ELEVEN_BANKS	BIT(10)
 
-#define PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_REG	0x340
-#define PIO_POW_MOD_CTL_REG	0x344
+#define PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_REG		0x340
+#define PIO_11B_POW_MOD_SEL_REG		0x380
+#define PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_OFS		0x004
 
 #define PIO_BANK_K_OFFSET		0x500
 
@@ -173,6 +175,7 @@ struct sunxi_pinctrl {
 	u32				bank_mem_size;
 	u32				pull_regs_offset;
 	u32				dlevel_field_width;
+	u32				pow_mod_sel_offset;
 };
 
 #define SUNXI_PIN(_pin, ...)					\
-- 
2.46.3
Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] pinctrl: sunxi: support moved power configuration registers
Posted by Chen-Yu Tsai 10 months ago
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 8:40 AM Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
>
> The Allwinner pincontroller IP features some registers to control the
> withstand voltage of each pin group. So far those registers were always
> located at the same offset, but the A523 SoC has moved them (probably to
> accommodate all eleven pin banks).
>
> Add a flag to note this feature, and use that to program the registers
> either at offset 0x340 or 0x380. So far no pincontroller driver uses
> this flag, but we need it for the upcoming A523 support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>  drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h |  7 +++++--
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> index 83a031ceb29f2..a1057122272bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> @@ -736,9 +736,9 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_set_io_bias_cfg(struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl,
>                 val = uV > 1800000 && uV <= 2500000 ? BIT(bank) : 0;
>
>                 raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctl->lock, flags);
> -               reg = readl(pctl->membase + PIO_POW_MOD_CTL_REG);
> +               reg = readl(pctl->membase + pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset);
>                 reg &= ~BIT(bank);
> -               writel(reg | val, pctl->membase + PIO_POW_MOD_CTL_REG);
> +               writel(reg | val, pctl->membase + pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset);
>                 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctl->lock, flags);
>
>                 fallthrough;
> @@ -746,9 +746,12 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_set_io_bias_cfg(struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl,
>                 val = uV <= 1800000 ? 1 : 0;
>
>                 raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctl->lock, flags);
> -               reg = readl(pctl->membase + PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_REG);
> +               reg = readl(pctl->membase + pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset +
> +                           PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_OFS);
>                 reg &= ~(1 << bank);
> -               writel(reg | val << bank, pctl->membase + PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_REG);
> +               writel(reg | val << bank,
> +                      pctl->membase + pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset +
> +                      PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_OFS);
>                 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctl->lock, flags);
>                 return 0;
>         default:
> @@ -1520,6 +1523,10 @@ int sunxi_pinctrl_init_with_flags(struct platform_device *pdev,
>                 pctl->pull_regs_offset = PULL_REGS_OFFSET;
>                 pctl->dlevel_field_width = DLEVEL_FIELD_WIDTH;
>         }
> +       if (flags & SUNXI_PINCTRL_ELEVEN_BANKS)
> +               pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset = PIO_11B_POW_MOD_SEL_REG;
> +       else
> +               pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset = PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_REG;
>
>         pctl->irq_array = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev,
>                                        IRQ_PER_BANK * pctl->desc->irq_banks,
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h
> index 6cf721876d89d..a93385e456a57 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h
> @@ -87,9 +87,11 @@
>  #define SUNXI_PINCTRL_VARIANT_MASK     GENMASK(7, 0)
>  #define SUNXI_PINCTRL_NEW_REG_LAYOUT   BIT(8)
>  #define SUNXI_PINCTRL_PORTF_SWITCH     BIT(9)
> +#define SUNXI_PINCTRL_ELEVEN_BANKS     BIT(10)
>
> -#define PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_REG    0x340
> -#define PIO_POW_MOD_CTL_REG    0x344
> +#define PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_REG            0x340
> +#define PIO_11B_POW_MOD_SEL_REG                0x380
> +#define PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_OFS            0x004

Shouldn't this be PIO_POW_MOD_CTL_OFS instead?

ChenYu

>
>  #define PIO_BANK_K_OFFSET              0x500
>
> @@ -173,6 +175,7 @@ struct sunxi_pinctrl {
>         u32                             bank_mem_size;
>         u32                             pull_regs_offset;
>         u32                             dlevel_field_width;
> +       u32                             pow_mod_sel_offset;
>  };
>
>  #define SUNXI_PIN(_pin, ...)                                   \
> --
> 2.46.3
>
Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] pinctrl: sunxi: support moved power configuration registers
Posted by Andre Przywara 9 months, 3 weeks ago
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 23:48:13 +0800
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org> wrote:

Hi,

> * # Be careful, this email looks suspicious; * Out of Character: The sender is exhibiting a significant deviation from their usual behavior, this may indicate that their account has been compromised. Be extra cautious before opening links or attachments. *
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 8:40 AM Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > The Allwinner pincontroller IP features some registers to control the
> > withstand voltage of each pin group. So far those registers were always
> > located at the same offset, but the A523 SoC has moved them (probably to
> > accommodate all eleven pin banks).
> >
> > Add a flag to note this feature, and use that to program the registers
> > either at offset 0x340 or 0x380. So far no pincontroller driver uses
> > this flag, but we need it for the upcoming A523 support.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 15 +++++++++++----
> >  drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h |  7 +++++--
> >  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> > index 83a031ceb29f2..a1057122272bd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c
> > @@ -736,9 +736,9 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_set_io_bias_cfg(struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl,
> >                 val = uV > 1800000 && uV <= 2500000 ? BIT(bank) : 0;
> >
> >                 raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctl->lock, flags);
> > -               reg = readl(pctl->membase + PIO_POW_MOD_CTL_REG);
> > +               reg = readl(pctl->membase + pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset);
> >                 reg &= ~BIT(bank);
> > -               writel(reg | val, pctl->membase + PIO_POW_MOD_CTL_REG);
> > +               writel(reg | val, pctl->membase + pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset);
> >                 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctl->lock, flags);
> >
> >                 fallthrough;
> > @@ -746,9 +746,12 @@ static int sunxi_pinctrl_set_io_bias_cfg(struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl,
> >                 val = uV <= 1800000 ? 1 : 0;
> >
> >                 raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctl->lock, flags);
> > -               reg = readl(pctl->membase + PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_REG);
> > +               reg = readl(pctl->membase + pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset +
> > +                           PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_OFS);
> >                 reg &= ~(1 << bank);
> > -               writel(reg | val << bank, pctl->membase + PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_REG);
> > +               writel(reg | val << bank,
> > +                      pctl->membase + pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset +
> > +                      PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_OFS);
> >                 raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctl->lock, flags);
> >                 return 0;
> >         default:
> > @@ -1520,6 +1523,10 @@ int sunxi_pinctrl_init_with_flags(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >                 pctl->pull_regs_offset = PULL_REGS_OFFSET;
> >                 pctl->dlevel_field_width = DLEVEL_FIELD_WIDTH;
> >         }
> > +       if (flags & SUNXI_PINCTRL_ELEVEN_BANKS)
> > +               pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset = PIO_11B_POW_MOD_SEL_REG;
> > +       else
> > +               pctl->pow_mod_sel_offset = PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_REG;
> >
> >         pctl->irq_array = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev,
> >                                        IRQ_PER_BANK * pctl->desc->irq_banks,
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h
> > index 6cf721876d89d..a93385e456a57 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.h
> > @@ -87,9 +87,11 @@
> >  #define SUNXI_PINCTRL_VARIANT_MASK     GENMASK(7, 0)
> >  #define SUNXI_PINCTRL_NEW_REG_LAYOUT   BIT(8)
> >  #define SUNXI_PINCTRL_PORTF_SWITCH     BIT(9)
> > +#define SUNXI_PINCTRL_ELEVEN_BANKS     BIT(10)
> >
> > -#define PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_REG    0x340
> > -#define PIO_POW_MOD_CTL_REG    0x344
> > +#define PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_REG            0x340
> > +#define PIO_11B_POW_MOD_SEL_REG                0x380
> > +#define PIO_POW_MOD_SEL_OFS            0x004  
> 
> Shouldn't this be PIO_POW_MOD_CTL_OFS instead?

Ah, I already got lost myself in those three-letter stubs, but you are
right: it's the offset of the control register within the POW_MOD(?)
register block.
So nice catch, will fix it.

Thanks,
Andre

> ChenYu
> 
> >
> >  #define PIO_BANK_K_OFFSET              0x500
> >
> > @@ -173,6 +175,7 @@ struct sunxi_pinctrl {
> >         u32                             bank_mem_size;
> >         u32                             pull_regs_offset;
> >         u32                             dlevel_field_width;
> > +       u32                             pow_mod_sel_offset;
> >  };
> >
> >  #define SUNXI_PIN(_pin, ...)                                   \
> > --
> > 2.46.3
> >  
> 
>