drivers/clk/qcom/apcs-sdx55.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
In the current implementation, the return value of dev_pm_domain_attach()
is not checked. This can lead to silent failures if the function fails,
as the code would continue execution and return 0, ignoring the error.
This patch adds a check for the return value of dev_pm_domain_attach().
If the function fails, an error message is logged using dev_err_probe(),
and the error is propagated to the existing error handling path `err`,
which ensures proper cleanup by calling clk_notifier_unregister().
Signed-off-by: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
---
drivers/clk/qcom/apcs-sdx55.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/apcs-sdx55.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/apcs-sdx55.c
index 76ece6c4a969..3ba01622d8f0 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/apcs-sdx55.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/apcs-sdx55.c
@@ -111,7 +111,11 @@ static int qcom_apcs_sdx55_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* driver, there seems to be no better place to do this. So do it here!
*/
cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(0);
- dev_pm_domain_attach(cpu_dev, true);
+ ret = dev_pm_domain_attach(cpu_dev, true);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "can't get PM domain: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }
return 0;
--
2.42.0.windows.2
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:20:17 +0800, Wentao Liang wrote:
> In the current implementation, the return value of dev_pm_domain_attach()
> is not checked. This can lead to silent failures if the function fails,
> as the code would continue execution and return 0, ignoring the error.
>
> This patch adds a check for the return value of dev_pm_domain_attach().
> If the function fails, an error message is logged using dev_err_probe(),
> and the error is propagated to the existing error handling path `err`,
> which ensures proper cleanup by calling clk_notifier_unregister().
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] clk: qcom: Fix missing error check for dev_pm_domain_attach()
commit: 36eb51ac8bd545b6344c05a9860e4e65ba8d7a62
Best regards,
--
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
… > This patch adds a check for the return value … See also: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.14-rc2#n94 How do you think about to add any tags (like “Fixes” and “Cc”) accordingly? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.14-rc2#n145 Regards, Markus
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.