[PATCH v5] erofs: use Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX to simplify switches

Hongzhen Luo posted 1 patch 12 months ago
fs/erofs/zmap.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
[PATCH v5] erofs: use Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX to simplify switches
Posted by Hongzhen Luo 12 months ago
There's no need to enumerate each type.  No logic changes.

Signed-off-by: Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen@linux.alibaba.com>
---
v5: Exit the loop and return EOPNOTSUPP when `!lookback_distance`.
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-erofs/20250207094515.2589242-1-hongzhen@linux.alibaba.com/
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250207085056.2502010-1-hongzhen@linux.alibaba.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250207080829.2405528-1-hongzhen@linux.alibaba.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250207064135.2249529-1-hongzhen@linux.alibaba.com/
---
 fs/erofs/zmap.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/erofs/zmap.c b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
index 689437e99a5a..d278ebd60281 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/zmap.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
@@ -265,26 +265,22 @@ static int z_erofs_extent_lookback(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m,
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 
-		switch (m->type) {
-		case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD:
+		if (m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
+			erofs_err(sb, "unknown type %u @ lcn %lu of nid %llu",
+				  m->type, lcn, vi->nid);
+			DBG_BUGON(1);
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+		} else if (m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD) {
 			lookback_distance = m->delta[0];
 			if (!lookback_distance)
-				goto err_bogus;
+				break;
 			continue;
-		case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_PLAIN:
-		case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD1:
-		case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD2:
+		} else {
 			m->headtype = m->type;
 			m->map->m_la = (lcn << lclusterbits) | m->clusterofs;
 			return 0;
-		default:
-			erofs_err(sb, "unknown type %u @ lcn %lu of nid %llu",
-				  m->type, lcn, vi->nid);
-			DBG_BUGON(1);
-			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		}
 	}
-err_bogus:
 	erofs_err(sb, "bogus lookback distance %u @ lcn %lu of nid %llu",
 		  lookback_distance, m->lcn, vi->nid);
 	DBG_BUGON(1);
@@ -329,35 +325,28 @@ static int z_erofs_get_extent_compressedlen(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m,
 	DBG_BUGON(lcn == initial_lcn &&
 		  m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD);
 
-	switch (m->type) {
-	case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_PLAIN:
-	case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD1:
-	case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD2:
+	if (m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD) {
+		if (m->delta[0] != 1) {
+			erofs_err(sb, "bogus CBLKCNT @ lcn %lu of nid %llu", lcn, vi->nid);
+			DBG_BUGON(1);
+			return -EFSCORRUPTED;
+		}
+		if (m->compressedblks)
+			goto out;
+	} else if (m->type < Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
 		/*
 		 * if the 1st NONHEAD lcluster is actually PLAIN or HEAD type
 		 * rather than CBLKCNT, it's a 1 block-sized pcluster.
 		 */
 		m->compressedblks = 1;
-		break;
-	case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD:
-		if (m->delta[0] != 1)
-			goto err_bonus_cblkcnt;
-		if (m->compressedblks)
-			break;
-		fallthrough;
-	default:
-		erofs_err(sb, "cannot found CBLKCNT @ lcn %lu of nid %llu", lcn,
-			  vi->nid);
-		DBG_BUGON(1);
-		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
+		goto out;
 	}
+	erofs_err(sb, "cannot found CBLKCNT @ lcn %lu of nid %llu", lcn, vi->nid);
+	DBG_BUGON(1);
+	return -EFSCORRUPTED;
 out:
 	m->map->m_plen = erofs_pos(sb, m->compressedblks);
 	return 0;
-err_bonus_cblkcnt:
-	erofs_err(sb, "bogus CBLKCNT @ lcn %lu of nid %llu", lcn, vi->nid);
-	DBG_BUGON(1);
-	return -EFSCORRUPTED;
 }
 
 static int z_erofs_get_extent_decompressedlen(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m)
@@ -386,9 +375,7 @@ static int z_erofs_get_extent_decompressedlen(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m)
 				m->delta[1] = 1;
 				DBG_BUGON(1);
 			}
-		} else if (m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_PLAIN ||
-			   m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD1 ||
-			   m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD2) {
+		} else if (m->type < Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
 			if (lcn != headlcn)
 				break;	/* ends at the next HEAD lcluster */
 			m->delta[1] = 1;
@@ -452,8 +439,7 @@ static int z_erofs_do_map_blocks(struct inode *inode,
 		}
 		/* m.lcn should be >= 1 if endoff < m.clusterofs */
 		if (!m.lcn) {
-			erofs_err(inode->i_sb,
-				  "invalid logical cluster 0 at nid %llu",
+			erofs_err(inode->i_sb, "invalid logical cluster 0 at nid %llu",
 				  vi->nid);
 			err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
 			goto unmap_out;
@@ -469,8 +455,7 @@ static int z_erofs_do_map_blocks(struct inode *inode,
 			goto unmap_out;
 		break;
 	default:
-		erofs_err(inode->i_sb,
-			  "unknown type %u @ offset %llu of nid %llu",
+		erofs_err(inode->i_sb, "unknown type %u @ offset %llu of nid %llu",
 			  m.type, ofs, vi->nid);
 		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		goto unmap_out;
-- 
2.43.5
Re: [PATCH v5] erofs: use Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX to simplify switches
Posted by Chao Yu 10 months, 4 weeks ago
On 2025/2/10 11:29, Hongzhen Luo wrote:
> There's no need to enumerate each type.  No logic changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen@linux.alibaba.com>

Looks good to me, feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>

And one minor comment below.

> diff --git a/fs/erofs/zmap.c b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
> index 689437e99a5a..d278ebd60281 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/zmap.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
> @@ -265,26 +265,22 @@ static int z_erofs_extent_lookback(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m,
>   		if (err)
>   			return err;
>   
> -		switch (m->type) {
> -		case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD:
> +		if (m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
> +			erofs_err(sb, "unknown type %u @ lcn %lu of nid %llu",
> +				  m->type, lcn, vi->nid);
> +			DBG_BUGON(1);
> +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 > +		} else if (m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD) {>   			lookback_distance = m->delta[0];
>   			if (!lookback_distance)
> -				goto err_bogus;
> +				break;
>   			continue;
> -		case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_PLAIN:
> -		case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD1:
> -		case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD2:
> +		} else {
>   			m->headtype = m->type;
>   			m->map->m_la = (lcn << lclusterbits) | m->clusterofs;
>   			return 0;
> -		default:
> -			erofs_err(sb, "unknown type %u @ lcn %lu of nid %llu",
> -				  m->type, lcn, vi->nid);
> -			DBG_BUGON(1);
> -			return -EOPNOTSUPP;

Should return EFSCORRUPTED here? is m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX a possible
case?

Btw, we'd better to do sanity check for m->type in z_erofs_load_full_lcluster(),
then we can treat m->type as reliable variable later.

	advise = le16_to_cpu(di->di_advise);
	m->type = advise & Z_EROFS_LI_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MASK;
	if (m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
		...
		DBG_BUGON(1);
		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
	}

Thanks,

>   		}
>   	}
> -err_bogus:
>   	erofs_err(sb, "bogus lookback distance %u @ lcn %lu of nid %llu",
>   		  lookback_distance, m->lcn, vi->nid);
>   	DBG_BUGON(1);
> @@ -329,35 +325,28 @@ static int z_erofs_get_extent_compressedlen(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m,
>   	DBG_BUGON(lcn == initial_lcn &&
>   		  m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD);
>   
> -	switch (m->type) {
> -	case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_PLAIN:
> -	case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD1:
> -	case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD2:
> +	if (m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD) {
> +		if (m->delta[0] != 1) {
> +			erofs_err(sb, "bogus CBLKCNT @ lcn %lu of nid %llu", lcn, vi->nid);
> +			DBG_BUGON(1);
> +			return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> +		}
> +		if (m->compressedblks)
> +			goto out;
> +	} else if (m->type < Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
>   		/*
>   		 * if the 1st NONHEAD lcluster is actually PLAIN or HEAD type
>   		 * rather than CBLKCNT, it's a 1 block-sized pcluster.
>   		 */
>   		m->compressedblks = 1;
> -		break;
> -	case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD:
> -		if (m->delta[0] != 1)
> -			goto err_bonus_cblkcnt;
> -		if (m->compressedblks)
> -			break;
> -		fallthrough;
> -	default:
> -		erofs_err(sb, "cannot found CBLKCNT @ lcn %lu of nid %llu", lcn,
> -			  vi->nid);
> -		DBG_BUGON(1);
> -		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> +		goto out;
>   	}
> +	erofs_err(sb, "cannot found CBLKCNT @ lcn %lu of nid %llu", lcn, vi->nid);
> +	DBG_BUGON(1);
> +	return -EFSCORRUPTED;
>   out:
>   	m->map->m_plen = erofs_pos(sb, m->compressedblks);
>   	return 0;
> -err_bonus_cblkcnt:
> -	erofs_err(sb, "bogus CBLKCNT @ lcn %lu of nid %llu", lcn, vi->nid);
> -	DBG_BUGON(1);
> -	return -EFSCORRUPTED;
>   }
>   
>   static int z_erofs_get_extent_decompressedlen(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m)
> @@ -386,9 +375,7 @@ static int z_erofs_get_extent_decompressedlen(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m)
>   				m->delta[1] = 1;
>   				DBG_BUGON(1);
>   			}
> -		} else if (m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_PLAIN ||
> -			   m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD1 ||
> -			   m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD2) {
> +		} else if (m->type < Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
>   			if (lcn != headlcn)
>   				break;	/* ends at the next HEAD lcluster */
>   			m->delta[1] = 1;
> @@ -452,8 +439,7 @@ static int z_erofs_do_map_blocks(struct inode *inode,
>   		}
>   		/* m.lcn should be >= 1 if endoff < m.clusterofs */
>   		if (!m.lcn) {
> -			erofs_err(inode->i_sb,
> -				  "invalid logical cluster 0 at nid %llu",
> +			erofs_err(inode->i_sb, "invalid logical cluster 0 at nid %llu",
>   				  vi->nid);
>   			err = -EFSCORRUPTED;
>   			goto unmap_out;
> @@ -469,8 +455,7 @@ static int z_erofs_do_map_blocks(struct inode *inode,
>   			goto unmap_out;
>   		break;
>   	default:
> -		erofs_err(inode->i_sb,
> -			  "unknown type %u @ offset %llu of nid %llu",
> +		erofs_err(inode->i_sb, "unknown type %u @ offset %llu of nid %llu",
>   			  m.type, ofs, vi->nid);
>   		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>   		goto unmap_out;
Re: [PATCH v5] erofs: use Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX to simplify switches
Posted by Gao Xiang 10 months, 3 weeks ago
Hi Chao,

On 2025/3/16 10:36, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2025/2/10 11:29, Hongzhen Luo wrote:
>> There's no need to enumerate each type.  No logic changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> Looks good to me, feel free to add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> 
> And one minor comment below.
> 
>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/zmap.c b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
>> index 689437e99a5a..d278ebd60281 100644
>> --- a/fs/erofs/zmap.c
>> +++ b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
>> @@ -265,26 +265,22 @@ static int z_erofs_extent_lookback(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m,
>>           if (err)
>>               return err;
>> -        switch (m->type) {
>> -        case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD:
>> +        if (m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
>> +            erofs_err(sb, "unknown type %u @ lcn %lu of nid %llu",
>> +                  m->type, lcn, vi->nid);
>> +            DBG_BUGON(1);
>> +            return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  > +        } else if (m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD) {>               lookback_distance = m->delta[0];
>>               if (!lookback_distance)
>> -                goto err_bogus;
>> +                break;
>>               continue;
>> -        case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_PLAIN:
>> -        case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD1:
>> -        case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD2:
>> +        } else {
>>               m->headtype = m->type;
>>               m->map->m_la = (lcn << lclusterbits) | m->clusterofs;
>>               return 0;
>> -        default:
>> -            erofs_err(sb, "unknown type %u @ lcn %lu of nid %llu",
>> -                  m->type, lcn, vi->nid);
>> -            DBG_BUGON(1);
>> -            return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
> Should return EFSCORRUPTED here? is m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX a possible
> case?

It's impossible by the latest on-disk definition, see:
#define Z_EROFS_LI_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MASK	(Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX - 1)

Previously, it was useful before Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD2 was
introduced, but the `default:` case is already deadcode now.

> 
> Btw, we'd better to do sanity check for m->type in z_erofs_load_full_lcluster(),
> then we can treat m->type as reliable variable later.
> 
>      advise = le16_to_cpu(di->di_advise);
>      m->type = advise & Z_EROFS_LI_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MASK;
>      if (m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {

It's always false here.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang
Re: [PATCH v5] erofs: use Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX to simplify switches
Posted by Chao Yu 10 months, 3 weeks ago
On 3/17/25 01:17, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Chao,
> 
> On 2025/3/16 10:36, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2025/2/10 11:29, Hongzhen Luo wrote:
>>> There's no need to enumerate each type.  No logic changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen@linux.alibaba.com>
>>
>> Looks good to me, feel free to add:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
>>
>> And one minor comment below.
>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/zmap.c b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
>>> index 689437e99a5a..d278ebd60281 100644
>>> --- a/fs/erofs/zmap.c
>>> +++ b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
>>> @@ -265,26 +265,22 @@ static int z_erofs_extent_lookback(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m,
>>>           if (err)
>>>               return err;
>>> -        switch (m->type) {
>>> -        case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD:
>>> +        if (m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
>>> +            erofs_err(sb, "unknown type %u @ lcn %lu of nid %llu",
>>> +                  m->type, lcn, vi->nid);
>>> +            DBG_BUGON(1);
>>> +            return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>  > +        } else if (m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD) {>               lookback_distance = m->delta[0];
>>>               if (!lookback_distance)
>>> -                goto err_bogus;
>>> +                break;
>>>               continue;
>>> -        case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_PLAIN:
>>> -        case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD1:
>>> -        case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD2:
>>> +        } else {
>>>               m->headtype = m->type;
>>>               m->map->m_la = (lcn << lclusterbits) | m->clusterofs;
>>>               return 0;
>>> -        default:
>>> -            erofs_err(sb, "unknown type %u @ lcn %lu of nid %llu",
>>> -                  m->type, lcn, vi->nid);
>>> -            DBG_BUGON(1);
>>> -            return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>
>> Should return EFSCORRUPTED here? is m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX a possible
>> case?
> 
> It's impossible by the latest on-disk definition, see:
> #define Z_EROFS_LI_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MASK    (Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX - 1)
> 
> Previously, it was useful before Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD2 was
> introduced, but the `default:` case is already deadcode now.

Xiang, thanks for the explanation.

So seems it can happen when mounting last image w/ old kernel which can not
support newly introduced Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_* type, then it makes sense to
return EOPNOTSUPP.

> 
>>
>> Btw, we'd better to do sanity check for m->type in z_erofs_load_full_lcluster(),
>> then we can treat m->type as reliable variable later.
>>
>>      advise = le16_to_cpu(di->di_advise);
>>      m->type = advise & Z_EROFS_LI_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MASK;
>>      if (m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
> 
> It's always false here.

So, what do you think of this?

From af584b2eacd468f145e9ee31ccdeedb7355d5afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 13:57:55 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] erofs: remove dead codes for cleanup

z_erofs_extent_lookback() and z_erofs_get_extent_decompressedlen() tries
to do sanity check on m->type, however their caller z_erofs_map_blocks_fo()
has already checked that, so let's remove those dead codes.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
---
 fs/erofs/zmap.c | 14 ++------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/erofs/zmap.c b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
index 8de50df05dfe..4d883ec212d7 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/zmap.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
@@ -265,17 +265,12 @@ static int z_erofs_extent_lookback(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m,
 		if (err)
 			return err;

-		if (m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
-			erofs_err(sb, "unknown type %u @ lcn %lu of nid %llu",
-				  m->type, lcn, vi->nid);
-			DBG_BUGON(1);
-			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-		} else if (m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD) {
+		if (m->type == Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD) {
 			lookback_distance = m->delta[0];
 			if (!lookback_distance)
 				break;
 			continue;
-		} else {
+		} else if (m->type < Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
 			m->headtype = m->type;
 			m->map->m_la = (lcn << lclusterbits) | m->clusterofs;
 			return 0;
@@ -379,11 +374,6 @@ static int z_erofs_get_extent_decompressedlen(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m)
 			if (lcn != headlcn)
 				break;	/* ends at the next HEAD lcluster */
 			m->delta[1] = 1;
-		} else {
-			erofs_err(inode->i_sb, "unknown type %u @ lcn %llu of nid %llu",
-				  m->type, lcn, vi->nid);
-			DBG_BUGON(1);
-			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 		}
 		lcn += m->delta[1];
 	}
-- 
2.48.1

> 
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
> 

Re: [PATCH v5] erofs: use Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX to simplify switches
Posted by Gao Xiang 10 months, 3 weeks ago
Hi Chao,

On 2025/3/17 14:03, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 3/17/25 01:17, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> Hi Chao,
>>

...

>>
>> Previously, it was useful before Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD2 was
>> introduced, but the `default:` case is already deadcode now.
> 
> Xiang, thanks for the explanation.
> 
> So seems it can happen when mounting last image w/ old kernel which can not
> support newly introduced Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_* type, then it makes sense to
> return EOPNOTSUPP.

Yeah.

> 
>>
>>>
>>> Btw, we'd better to do sanity check for m->type in z_erofs_load_full_lcluster(),
>>> then we can treat m->type as reliable variable later.
>>>
>>>       advise = le16_to_cpu(di->di_advise);
>>>       m->type = advise & Z_EROFS_LI_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MASK;
>>>       if (m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
>>
>> It's always false here.
> 
> So, what do you think of this?
> 
>  From af584b2eacd468f145e9ee31ccdeedb7355d5afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 13:57:55 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] erofs: remove dead codes for cleanup
> 
> z_erofs_extent_lookback() and z_erofs_get_extent_decompressedlen() tries
> to do sanity check on m->type, however their caller z_erofs_map_blocks_fo()
> has already checked that, so let's remove those dead codes.

z_erofs_extent_lookback() will (lookback) read new lcn in
z_erofs_load_lcluster_from_disk() so it won't be covered by
the original z_erofs_map_blocks_fo().

I think this check can be resolved in
z_erofs_load_lcluster_from_disk() instead but maybe address
for the next cycle? since there are already enough features
for this cycle and I have to make sure no major issues....

Thanks,
Gao Xiang
Re: [PATCH v5] erofs: use Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX to simplify switches
Posted by Chao Yu 10 months, 3 weeks ago
On 3/17/25 14:15, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Chao,
> 
> On 2025/3/17 14:03, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 3/17/25 01:17, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>> Hi Chao,
>>>
> 
> ...
> 
>>>
>>> Previously, it was useful before Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD2 was
>>> introduced, but the `default:` case is already deadcode now.
>>
>> Xiang, thanks for the explanation.
>>
>> So seems it can happen when mounting last image w/ old kernel which can not
>> support newly introduced Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_* type, then it makes sense to
>> return EOPNOTSUPP.
> 
> Yeah.
> 
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Btw, we'd better to do sanity check for m->type in z_erofs_load_full_lcluster(),
>>>> then we can treat m->type as reliable variable later.
>>>>
>>>>       advise = le16_to_cpu(di->di_advise);
>>>>       m->type = advise & Z_EROFS_LI_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MASK;
>>>>       if (m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
>>>
>>> It's always false here.
>>
>> So, what do you think of this?
>>
>>  From af584b2eacd468f145e9ee31ccdeedb7355d5afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
>> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 13:57:55 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] erofs: remove dead codes for cleanup
>>
>> z_erofs_extent_lookback() and z_erofs_get_extent_decompressedlen() tries
>> to do sanity check on m->type, however their caller z_erofs_map_blocks_fo()
>> has already checked that, so let's remove those dead codes.
> 
> z_erofs_extent_lookback() will (lookback) read new lcn in
> z_erofs_load_lcluster_from_disk() so it won't be covered by
> the original z_erofs_map_blocks_fo().

Xiang,

Oh, I see, changed here:

- z_erofs_extent_lookback
 - z_erofs_load_lcluster_from_disk
  - z_erofs_load_full_lcluster
  : m->type = advise & Z_EROFS_LI_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MASK;
 - z_erofs_load_compact_lcluster
 : m->type = type;

> 
> I think this check can be resolved in
> z_erofs_load_lcluster_from_disk() instead but maybe address
> for the next cycle? since there are already enough features
> for this cycle and I have to make sure no major issues....

Yeah, it's fine to check the cleanup later, let's keep focusing
on improving patches in dev now.

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
> 

Re: [PATCH v5] erofs: use Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX to simplify switches
Posted by Gao Xiang 10 months, 3 weeks ago

On 2025/3/17 14:42, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 3/17/25 14:15, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> Hi Chao,
>>
>> On 2025/3/17 14:03, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 3/17/25 01:17, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>>> Hi Chao,
>>>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>>
>>>> Previously, it was useful before Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_HEAD2 was
>>>> introduced, but the `default:` case is already deadcode now.
>>>
>>> Xiang, thanks for the explanation.
>>>
>>> So seems it can happen when mounting last image w/ old kernel which can not
>>> support newly introduced Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_* type, then it makes sense to
>>> return EOPNOTSUPP.
>>
>> Yeah.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Btw, we'd better to do sanity check for m->type in z_erofs_load_full_lcluster(),
>>>>> then we can treat m->type as reliable variable later.
>>>>>
>>>>>        advise = le16_to_cpu(di->di_advise);
>>>>>        m->type = advise & Z_EROFS_LI_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MASK;
>>>>>        if (m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
>>>>
>>>> It's always false here.
>>>
>>> So, what do you think of this?
>>>
>>>   From af584b2eacd468f145e9ee31ccdeedb7355d5afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
>>> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 13:57:55 +0800
>>> Subject: [PATCH] erofs: remove dead codes for cleanup
>>>
>>> z_erofs_extent_lookback() and z_erofs_get_extent_decompressedlen() tries
>>> to do sanity check on m->type, however their caller z_erofs_map_blocks_fo()
>>> has already checked that, so let's remove those dead codes.
>>
>> z_erofs_extent_lookback() will (lookback) read new lcn in
>> z_erofs_load_lcluster_from_disk() so it won't be covered by
>> the original z_erofs_map_blocks_fo().
> 
> Xiang,
> 
> Oh, I see, changed here:
> 
> - z_erofs_extent_lookback
>   - z_erofs_load_lcluster_from_disk
>    - z_erofs_load_full_lcluster
>    : m->type = advise & Z_EROFS_LI_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MASK;
>   - z_erofs_load_compact_lcluster
>   : m->type = type;

Yeah, we'd better to move all checks into
z_erofs_load_lcluster_from_disk() later.

> 
>>
>> I think this check can be resolved in
>> z_erofs_load_lcluster_from_disk() instead but maybe address
>> for the next cycle? since there are already enough features
>> for this cycle and I have to make sure no major issues....
> 
> Yeah, it's fine to check the cleanup later, let's keep focusing
> on improving patches in dev now.

Yes.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gao Xiang
>>

Re: [PATCH v5] erofs: use Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX to simplify switches
Posted by Gao Xiang 10 months, 3 weeks ago

On 2025/3/17 01:17, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Chao,
> 
> On 2025/3/16 10:36, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2025/2/10 11:29, Hongzhen Luo wrote:
>>> There's no need to enumerate each type.  No logic changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen@linux.alibaba.com>
>>
>> Looks good to me, feel free to add:
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
>>
>> And one minor comment below.
>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/zmap.c b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
>>> index 689437e99a5a..d278ebd60281 100644
>>> --- a/fs/erofs/zmap.c
>>> +++ b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
>>> @@ -265,26 +265,22 @@ static int z_erofs_extent_lookback(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m,
>>>           if (err)
>>>               return err;
>>> -        switch (m->type) {
>>> -        case Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_NONHEAD:
>>> +        if (m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX) {
>>> +            erofs_err(sb, "unknown type %u @ lcn %lu of nid %llu",
>>> +                  m->type, lcn, vi->nid);
>>> +            DBG_BUGON(1);
>>> +            return -EOPNOTSUPP;

`m->type >= Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX` is checked here BTW,
I think the patch is good.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang
Re: [PATCH v5] erofs: use Z_EROFS_LCLUSTER_TYPE_MAX to simplify switches
Posted by Gao Xiang 12 months ago

On 2025/2/10 11:29, Hongzhen Luo wrote:
> There's no need to enumerate each type.  No logic changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hongzhen Luo <hongzhen@linux.alibaba.com>

Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>

Thanks,
Gao Xiang