drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
A previous code reorganization inadvertently dropped the two tags,
which leads to a "make W=1" warning:
WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.o
Add these back.
Fixes: cd4db38c4368 ("hwmon: (sg2042) Use per-client debugfs entry")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.c b/drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.c
index 74c35945d169..105131c4acf7 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.c
@@ -355,4 +355,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver sg2042_mcu_driver = {
};
module_i2c_driver(sg2042_mcu_driver);
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MCU I2C driver for SG2042 soc platform");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
--
2.39.5
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 01:14:08PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> A previous code reorganization inadvertently dropped the two tags,
> which leads to a "make W=1" warning:
>
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.o
>
> Add these back.
>
> Fixes: cd4db38c4368 ("hwmon: (sg2042) Use per-client debugfs entry")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Reviewed-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Applied.
Thanks,
Guenter
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 01:14:08PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> A previous code reorganization inadvertently dropped the two tags,
> which leads to a "make W=1" warning:
>
> WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.o
>
> Add these back.
>
> Fixes: cd4db38c4368 ("hwmon: (sg2042) Use per-client debugfs entry")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.c b/drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.c
> index 74c35945d169..105131c4acf7 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.c
> @@ -355,4 +355,6 @@ static struct i2c_driver sg2042_mcu_driver = {
> };
> module_i2c_driver(sg2042_mcu_driver);
>
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@outlook.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MCU I2C driver for SG2042 soc platform");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> --
> 2.39.5
>
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 08:28:56PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 01:14:08PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > A previous code reorganization inadvertently dropped the two tags,
> > which leads to a "make W=1" warning:
:( Very sloppy, I am sorry!
> > WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.o
> >
> > Add these back.
> >
> > Fixes: cd4db38c4368 ("hwmon: (sg2042) Use per-client debugfs entry")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> Reviewed-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Just wondering: Inochi Amaoto's email above is using gmail, below is
using outlook. Is the old one still valid?
On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 01:34:57PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 08:28:56PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 01:14:08PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > >
> > > A previous code reorganization inadvertently dropped the two tags,
> > > which leads to a "make W=1" warning:
>
> :( Very sloppy, I am sorry!
>
> > > WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/hwmon/sg2042-mcu.o
> > >
> > > Add these back.
> > >
> > > Fixes: cd4db38c4368 ("hwmon: (sg2042) Use per-client debugfs entry")
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
>
> Just wondering: Inochi Amaoto's email above is using gmail, below is
> using outlook. Is the old one still valid?
>
Since the MS requires 2FA for email client, I uses gmail as an
alternative to send patches and reply. I may use outlook to send
in the furture if I find a way to login, or just update the
maintainance information if no way.
Regards,
Inochi.
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.