arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
When waking a VM's NX huge page recovery thread, ensure the thread is
actually alive before trying to wake it. Now that the thread is spawned
on-demand during KVM_RUN, a VM without a recovery thread is reachable via
the related module params.
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000040
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
RIP: 0010:vhost_task_wake+0x5/0x10
Call Trace:
<TASK>
set_nx_huge_pages+0xcc/0x1e0 [kvm]
param_attr_store+0x8a/0xd0
module_attr_store+0x1a/0x30
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x12f/0x1e0
vfs_write+0x233/0x3e0
ksys_write+0x60/0xd0
do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x160
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
RIP: 0033:0x7f3b52710104
</TASK>
Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm
CR2: 0000000000000040
Fixes: 931656b9e2ff ("kvm: defer huge page recovery vhost task to later")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index a45ae60e84ab..74c20dbb92da 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -7120,6 +7120,19 @@ static void mmu_destroy_caches(void)
kmem_cache_destroy(mmu_page_header_cache);
}
+static void kvm_wake_nx_recovery_thread(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ /*
+ * The NX recovery thread is spawned on-demand at the first KVM_RUN and
+ * may not be valid even though the VM is globally visible. Do nothing,
+ * as such a VM can't have any possible NX huge pages.
+ */
+ struct vhost_task *nx_thread = READ_ONCE(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
+
+ if (nx_thread)
+ vhost_task_wake(nx_thread);
+}
+
static int get_nx_huge_pages(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp)
{
if (nx_hugepage_mitigation_hard_disabled)
@@ -7180,7 +7193,7 @@ static int set_nx_huge_pages(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(kvm);
mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
- vhost_task_wake(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
+ kvm_wake_nx_recovery_thread(kvm);
}
mutex_unlock(&kvm_lock);
}
@@ -7315,7 +7328,7 @@ static int set_nx_huge_pages_recovery_param(const char *val, const struct kernel
mutex_lock(&kvm_lock);
list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list)
- vhost_task_wake(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
+ kvm_wake_nx_recovery_thread(kvm);
mutex_unlock(&kvm_lock);
}
@@ -7451,14 +7464,20 @@ static void kvm_mmu_start_lpage_recovery(struct once *once)
{
struct kvm_arch *ka = container_of(once, struct kvm_arch, nx_once);
struct kvm *kvm = container_of(ka, struct kvm, arch);
+ struct vhost_task *nx_thread;
kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_last = get_jiffies_64();
- kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread = vhost_task_create(
- kvm_nx_huge_page_recovery_worker, kvm_nx_huge_page_recovery_worker_kill,
- kvm, "kvm-nx-lpage-recovery");
+ nx_thread = vhost_task_create(kvm_nx_huge_page_recovery_worker,
+ kvm_nx_huge_page_recovery_worker_kill,
+ kvm, "kvm-nx-lpage-recovery");
- if (kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread)
- vhost_task_start(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
+ if (!nx_thread)
+ return;
+
+ vhost_task_start(nx_thread);
+
+ /* Make the task visible only once it is fully started. */
+ WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread, nx_thread);
}
int kvm_mmu_post_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
base-commit: f7bafceba76e9ab475b413578c1757ee18c3e44b
--
2.48.1.262.g85cc9f2d1e-goog
Queued, thanks. Paolo
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 03:46:23PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> When waking a VM's NX huge page recovery thread, ensure the thread is
> actually alive before trying to wake it. Now that the thread is spawned
> on-demand during KVM_RUN, a VM without a recovery thread is reachable via
> the related module params.
Oh, this is what I thought we could do. I should have read ahead. :)
> +static void kvm_wake_nx_recovery_thread(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + /*
> + * The NX recovery thread is spawned on-demand at the first KVM_RUN and
> + * may not be valid even though the VM is globally visible. Do nothing,
> + * as such a VM can't have any possible NX huge pages.
> + */
> + struct vhost_task *nx_thread = READ_ONCE(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
> +
> + if (nx_thread)
> + vhost_task_wake(nx_thread);
> +}
> +
> static int get_nx_huge_pages(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> {
> if (nx_hugepage_mitigation_hard_disabled)
> @@ -7180,7 +7193,7 @@ static int set_nx_huge_pages(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
> kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(kvm);
> mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
>
> - vhost_task_wake(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
> + kvm_wake_nx_recovery_thread(kvm);
> }
> mutex_unlock(&kvm_lock);
> }
> @@ -7315,7 +7328,7 @@ static int set_nx_huge_pages_recovery_param(const char *val, const struct kernel
> mutex_lock(&kvm_lock);
>
> list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list)
> - vhost_task_wake(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
> + kvm_wake_nx_recovery_thread(kvm);
>
> mutex_unlock(&kvm_lock);
> }
> @@ -7451,14 +7464,20 @@ static void kvm_mmu_start_lpage_recovery(struct once *once)
> {
> struct kvm_arch *ka = container_of(once, struct kvm_arch, nx_once);
> struct kvm *kvm = container_of(ka, struct kvm, arch);
> + struct vhost_task *nx_thread;
>
> kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_last = get_jiffies_64();
> - kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread = vhost_task_create(
> - kvm_nx_huge_page_recovery_worker, kvm_nx_huge_page_recovery_worker_kill,
> - kvm, "kvm-nx-lpage-recovery");
> + nx_thread = vhost_task_create(kvm_nx_huge_page_recovery_worker,
> + kvm_nx_huge_page_recovery_worker_kill,
> + kvm, "kvm-nx-lpage-recovery");
>
> - if (kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread)
> - vhost_task_start(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
> + if (!nx_thread)
> + return;
> +
> + vhost_task_start(nx_thread);
> +
> + /* Make the task visible only once it is fully started. */
> + WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread, nx_thread);
I believe the WRITE_ONCE needs to happen before the vhost_task_start to
ensure the parameter update callback can see it before it's started.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 03:46:23PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > +static void kvm_wake_nx_recovery_thread(struct kvm *kvm)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * The NX recovery thread is spawned on-demand at the first KVM_RUN and
> > + * may not be valid even though the VM is globally visible. Do nothing,
> > + * as such a VM can't have any possible NX huge pages.
> > + */
> > + struct vhost_task *nx_thread = READ_ONCE(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
> > +
> > + if (nx_thread)
> > + vhost_task_wake(nx_thread);
> > +}
...
> > + nx_thread = vhost_task_create(kvm_nx_huge_page_recovery_worker,
> > + kvm_nx_huge_page_recovery_worker_kill,
> > + kvm, "kvm-nx-lpage-recovery");
> >
> > - if (kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread)
> > - vhost_task_start(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
> > + if (!nx_thread)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + vhost_task_start(nx_thread);
> > +
> > + /* Make the task visible only once it is fully started. */
> > + WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread, nx_thread);
>
> I believe the WRITE_ONCE needs to happen before the vhost_task_start to
> ensure the parameter update callback can see it before it's started.
It's not clear to me that calling vhost_task_wake() before vhost_task_start() is
allowed, which is why I deliberately waited until the task was started to make it
visible. Though FWIW, doing "vhost_task_wake(nx_thread)" before vhost_task_start()
doesn't explode.
Ha! There is another bug here, but we can smack 'em both with a bit of trickery
and do an optimized serialization in the process.
If vhost_task_create() fails, then the call_once() will "succeed" and mark the
structure as ONCE_COMPLETED. The first KVM_RUN will fail with -ENOMEM, but any
subsequent calls will succeed, including in-flight KVM_RUNs on other threads.
Odds are good userspace will terminate the VM on -ENOMEM, but that't not guaranteed,
e.g. if userspace has logic to retry a few times before giving up.
If call_once() and its callback are modified to return errors, then we can abuse
call_once() to serialize against kvm_mmu_start_lpage_recovery() when waking the
recovery thread. If the recovery thread is fully created, call_once() is a lockless
happy path, otherwise the wakup path will serialize against the creation path
via the once's mutex.
Over two patches...
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
include/linux/call_once.h | 16 ++++++++++----
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index a45ae60e84ab..f3ad33cd68b3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -7120,6 +7120,26 @@ static void mmu_destroy_caches(void)
kmem_cache_destroy(mmu_page_header_cache);
}
+static int kvm_nx_recovery_thread_not_ready(struct once *once)
+{
+ return -ENOENT;
+}
+
+static void kvm_wake_nx_recovery_thread(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ /*
+ * The NX recovery thread is spawned on-demand at the first KVM_RUN and
+ * may not be started even though the VM is globally visible. Abuse
+ * call_once() to serialize against starting the recovery thread; if
+ * this task's callback is invoked, then the thread hasn't been created
+ * and the thread is guaranteed to see up-to-date parameters.
+ */
+ if (call_once(&kvm->arch.nx_once, kvm_nx_recovery_thread_not_ready))
+ return;
+
+ vhost_task_wake(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
+}
+
static int get_nx_huge_pages(char *buffer, const struct kernel_param *kp)
{
if (nx_hugepage_mitigation_hard_disabled)
@@ -7180,7 +7200,7 @@ static int set_nx_huge_pages(const char *val, const struct kernel_param *kp)
kvm_mmu_zap_all_fast(kvm);
mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
- vhost_task_wake(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
+ kvm_wake_nx_recovery_thread(kvm);
}
mutex_unlock(&kvm_lock);
}
@@ -7315,7 +7335,7 @@ static int set_nx_huge_pages_recovery_param(const char *val, const struct kernel
mutex_lock(&kvm_lock);
list_for_each_entry(kvm, &vm_list, vm_list)
- vhost_task_wake(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
+ kvm_wake_nx_recovery_thread(kvm);
mutex_unlock(&kvm_lock);
}
@@ -7447,7 +7467,7 @@ static bool kvm_nx_huge_page_recovery_worker(void *data)
return true;
}
-static void kvm_mmu_start_lpage_recovery(struct once *once)
+static int kvm_mmu_start_lpage_recovery(struct once *once)
{
struct kvm_arch *ka = container_of(once, struct kvm_arch, nx_once);
struct kvm *kvm = container_of(ka, struct kvm, arch);
@@ -7457,21 +7477,21 @@ static void kvm_mmu_start_lpage_recovery(struct once *once)
kvm_nx_huge_page_recovery_worker, kvm_nx_huge_page_recovery_worker_kill,
kvm, "kvm-nx-lpage-recovery");
- if (kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread)
- vhost_task_start(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
-}
-
-int kvm_mmu_post_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
-{
- if (nx_hugepage_mitigation_hard_disabled)
- return 0;
-
- call_once(&kvm->arch.nx_once, kvm_mmu_start_lpage_recovery);
if (!kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread)
return -ENOMEM;
+
+ vhost_task_start(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
return 0;
}
+int kvm_mmu_post_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ if (nx_hugepage_mitigation_hard_disabled)
+ return 0;
+
+ return call_once(&kvm->arch.nx_once, kvm_mmu_start_lpage_recovery);
+}
+
void kvm_mmu_pre_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
{
if (kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread)
diff --git a/include/linux/call_once.h b/include/linux/call_once.h
index 6261aa0b3fb0..9d47ed50139b 100644
--- a/include/linux/call_once.h
+++ b/include/linux/call_once.h
@@ -26,20 +26,28 @@ do { \
__once_init((once), #once, &__key); \
} while (0)
-static inline void call_once(struct once *once, void (*cb)(struct once *))
+static inline int call_once(struct once *once, int (*cb)(struct once *))
{
+ int r;
+
/* Pairs with atomic_set_release() below. */
if (atomic_read_acquire(&once->state) == ONCE_COMPLETED)
- return;
+ return 0;
guard(mutex)(&once->lock);
WARN_ON(atomic_read(&once->state) == ONCE_RUNNING);
if (atomic_read(&once->state) != ONCE_NOT_STARTED)
- return;
+ return -EINVAL;
atomic_set(&once->state, ONCE_RUNNING);
- cb(once);
+ r = cb(once);
+ if (r) {
+ atomic_set(&once->state, ONCE_NOT_STARTED);
+ return r;
+ }
+
atomic_set_release(&once->state, ONCE_COMPLETED);
+ return 0;
}
#endif /* _LINUX_CALL_ONCE_H */
base-commit: f7bafceba76e9ab475b413578c1757ee18c3e44b
--
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 08:48:03AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > - vhost_task_start(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread); > > > + if (!nx_thread) > > > + return; > > > + > > > + vhost_task_start(nx_thread); > > > + > > > + /* Make the task visible only once it is fully started. */ > > > + WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread, nx_thread); > > > > I believe the WRITE_ONCE needs to happen before the vhost_task_start to > > ensure the parameter update callback can see it before it's started. > > It's not clear to me that calling vhost_task_wake() before vhost_task_start() is > allowed, which is why I deliberately waited until the task was started to make it > visible. Though FWIW, doing "vhost_task_wake(nx_thread)" before vhost_task_start() > doesn't explode. Hm, it does look questionable to try to wake a process that hadn't been started yet, but I think it may be okay: task state will be TASK_NEW before vhost_task_start(), which looks like will cause wake_up_process() to do nothing.
On 1/27/25 19:22, Keith Busch wrote: >> It's not clear to me that calling vhost_task_wake() before vhost_task_start() is >> allowed, which is why I deliberately waited until the task was started to make it >> visible. Though FWIW, doing "vhost_task_wake(nx_thread)" before vhost_task_start() >> doesn't explode. > > Hm, it does look questionable to try to wake a process that hadn't been > started yet, but I think it may be okay: task state will be TASK_NEW > before vhost_task_start(), which looks like will cause wake_up_process() > to do nothing. Yes, it's okay because both wake_up_new_task() and try_to_wake_up() take p->pi_lock. try_to_wake_up() does not match either bit in TASK_NORMAL (which is TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE | TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE) and does nothing. I'm queuing the patch with the store before vhost_task_start, and acquire/release instead of just READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE. diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 74c20dbb92da..6d5708146384 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -7127,7 +7127,8 @@ static void kvm_wake_nx_recovery_thread(struct kvm *kvm) * may not be valid even though the VM is globally visible. Do nothing, * as such a VM can't have any possible NX huge pages. */ - struct vhost_task *nx_thread = READ_ONCE(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread); + struct vhost_task *nx_thread = + smp_load_acquire(&kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread); if (nx_thread) vhost_task_wake(nx_thread); @@ -7474,10 +7475,10 @@ static void kvm_mmu_start_lpage_recovery(struct once *once) if (!nx_thread) return; - vhost_task_start(nx_thread); + /* Make the task visible only once it is fully created. */ + smp_store_release(&kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread, nx_thread); - /* Make the task visible only once it is fully started. */ - WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread, nx_thread); + vhost_task_start(nx_thread); } int kvm_mmu_post_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > I'm queuing the patch with the store before vhost_task_start, and > acquire/release instead of just READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE. Thanks, looks good to me: Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > index 74c20dbb92da..6d5708146384 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c > @@ -7127,7 +7127,8 @@ static void kvm_wake_nx_recovery_thread(struct kvm *kvm) > * may not be valid even though the VM is globally visible. Do nothing, > * as such a VM can't have any possible NX huge pages. > */ > - struct vhost_task *nx_thread = READ_ONCE(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread); > + struct vhost_task *nx_thread = > + smp_load_acquire(&kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread); > if (nx_thread) > vhost_task_wake(nx_thread); > @@ -7474,10 +7475,10 @@ static void kvm_mmu_start_lpage_recovery(struct once *once) > if (!nx_thread) > return; > - vhost_task_start(nx_thread); > + /* Make the task visible only once it is fully created. */ > + smp_store_release(&kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread, nx_thread); > - /* Make the task visible only once it is fully started. */ > - WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread, nx_thread); > + vhost_task_start(nx_thread); > } > int kvm_mmu_post_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm) >
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 08:48:03AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > If vhost_task_create() fails, then the call_once() will "succeed" and mark the > structure as ONCE_COMPLETED. The first KVM_RUN will fail with -ENOMEM, but any > subsequent calls will succeed, including in-flight KVM_RUNs on other threads. The criteria for returning -ENOMEM for any KVM_RUN is if we have a NULL nx_huge_page_recovery_thread vhost_task. So I think that part, at least, is fine. The call_once is just needed to ensure that only the very first KVM_RUN even tries to create it. If the vhost_task_create fails, then all the KVM_RUN threads will see the NULL nx_huge_page_recovery_thread and return -ENOMEM. What you're suggesting here will allow a subsequent thread to attempt creating the vhost task if the first one failed. Maybe you do want to try again, but the current upstream code doesn't retry this, so I thought it best to keep that behavior.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2025, Keith Busch wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 08:48:03AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > If vhost_task_create() fails, then the call_once() will "succeed" and mark the > > structure as ONCE_COMPLETED. The first KVM_RUN will fail with -ENOMEM, but any > > subsequent calls will succeed, including in-flight KVM_RUNs on other threads. > > The criteria for returning -ENOMEM for any KVM_RUN is if we have a NULL > nx_huge_page_recovery_thread vhost_task. So I think that part, at least, > is fine. > > The call_once is just needed to ensure that only the very first KVM_RUN > even tries to create it. If the vhost_task_create fails, then all the > KVM_RUN threads will see the NULL nx_huge_page_recovery_thread and > return -ENOMEM. Ah, duh, because the check is performed by the caller, outside of the "once" protection. > What you're suggesting here will allow a subsequent thread to attempt > creating the vhost task if the first one failed. Maybe you do want to > try again, but the current upstream code doesn't retry this, so I > thought it best to keep that behavior. No strong opinion. In practice, it's a moot point because the odds of a VM being able to make forward progress if task creation hits an OOM are basically nil. I'll defer to Paolo on what he thinks is best for the call_once() API.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index a45ae60e84ab..74c20dbb92da 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -7120,6 +7120,19 @@ static void mmu_destroy_caches(void)
> kmem_cache_destroy(mmu_page_header_cache);
> }
>
> +static void kvm_wake_nx_recovery_thread(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> + /*
> + * The NX recovery thread is spawned on-demand at the first KVM_RUN and
> + * may not be valid even though the VM is globally visible. Do nothing,
> + * as such a VM can't have any possible NX huge pages.
> + */
> + struct vhost_task *nx_thread = READ_ONCE(kvm->arch.nx_huge_page_recovery_thread);
> +
> + if (nx_thread)
> + vhost_task_wake(nx_thread);
As mentioned in the original thread[*], I belatedly realized there's a race with
this approach. If vhost_task_start() completes and kvm_nx_huge_page_recovery_worker()
runs before a parameter change, but the parameter change runs before the WRITE_ONCE(),
then the worker will run with stale params and could end up sleeping for far longer
than userspace wants.
I assume we could address that by taking kvm->arch.nx_once.mutex in this helper
instead of using the lockless approach. I don't think that would lead to any
deadlocks?
[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Z5QsBXJ7rkJFDtmK@google.com
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.