Support for 32-bit s390 is very easy to implement and useful for
testing. For example I used to test some generic compat_ptr() logic,
which is only testable on 32-bit s390.

The series depends on my other series
"selftests/nolibc: test kernel configuration cleanups".
(It's not a hard dependency, only a minor diff conflict)

Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
---
Thomas Weißschuh (2):
      selftests/nolibc: rename s390 to s390x
      tools/nolibc: add support for 32-bit s390

 tools/include/nolibc/arch-s390.h            |  5 +++++
 tools/include/nolibc/arch.h                 |  2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile     | 10 ++++++++--
 tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/run-tests.sh |  8 +++++++-
 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 0597614d84c8593ba906418bf3c0c0de1e02e82a
change-id: 20250122-nolibc-s390-e57141682c88

Best regards,
-- 
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 07:43:44PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Support for 32-bit s390 is very easy to implement and useful for
> testing. For example I used to test some generic compat_ptr() logic,
> which is only testable on 32-bit s390.
> 
> The series depends on my other series
> "selftests/nolibc: test kernel configuration cleanups".
> (It's not a hard dependency, only a minor diff conflict)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>

I'm generally fine with the series from the nolibc perspective. I've
added Sven in Cc in case he wants to double-check anything, given that
he initially contributed the s390 support.

Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>

Thanks!
Willy