Add backend support for setting oversampling ratio.
Reviewed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
---
no changes in v10.
drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/iio/backend.h | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c
index 2088afa7a55c..d4ad36f54090 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c
@@ -681,6 +681,21 @@ int iio_backend_data_size_set(struct iio_backend *back, unsigned int size)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_data_size_set, "IIO_BACKEND");
+/**
+ * iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set - set the oversampling ratio
+ * @back: Backend device
+ * @ratio: The oversampling ratio - value 1 corresponds to no oversampling.
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * 0 on success, negative error number on failure.
+ */
+int iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set(struct iio_backend *back,
+ unsigned int ratio)
+{
+ return iio_backend_op_call(back, oversampling_ratio_set, ratio);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set, "IIO_BACKEND");
+
/**
* iio_backend_extend_chan_spec - Extend an IIO channel
* @back: Backend device
diff --git a/include/linux/iio/backend.h b/include/linux/iio/backend.h
index 9ae861a21472..e45b7dfbec35 100644
--- a/include/linux/iio/backend.h
+++ b/include/linux/iio/backend.h
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ enum iio_backend_interface_type {
* @ext_info_get: Extended info getter.
* @interface_type_get: Interface type.
* @data_size_set: Data size.
+ * @oversampling_ratio_set: Set Oversampling ratio.
* @read_raw: Read a channel attribute from a backend device
* @debugfs_print_chan_status: Print channel status into a buffer.
* @debugfs_reg_access: Read or write register value of backend.
@@ -139,6 +140,8 @@ struct iio_backend_ops {
int (*interface_type_get)(struct iio_backend *back,
enum iio_backend_interface_type *type);
int (*data_size_set)(struct iio_backend *back, unsigned int size);
+ int (*oversampling_ratio_set)(struct iio_backend *back,
+ unsigned int ratio);
int (*read_raw)(struct iio_backend *back,
struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int *val, int *val2,
long mask);
@@ -200,6 +203,8 @@ ssize_t iio_backend_ext_info_get(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, uintptr_t private,
int iio_backend_interface_type_get(struct iio_backend *back,
enum iio_backend_interface_type *type);
int iio_backend_data_size_set(struct iio_backend *back, unsigned int size);
+int iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set(struct iio_backend *back,
+ unsigned int ratio);
int iio_backend_read_raw(struct iio_backend *back,
struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int *val, int *val2,
long mask);
--
2.48.1
On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 15:06 +0200, Antoniu Miclaus wrote: > Add backend support for setting oversampling ratio. > > Reviewed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> > Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com> > --- > no changes in v10. > drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > include/linux/iio/backend.h | 5 +++++ > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio- > backend.c > index 2088afa7a55c..d4ad36f54090 100644 > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c > @@ -681,6 +681,21 @@ int iio_backend_data_size_set(struct iio_backend *back, > unsigned int size) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_data_size_set, "IIO_BACKEND"); > > +/** > + * iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set - set the oversampling ratio > + * @back: Backend device > + * @ratio: The oversampling ratio - value 1 corresponds to no oversampling. > + * > + * Return: > + * 0 on success, negative error number on failure. > + */ > +int iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set(struct iio_backend *back, > + unsigned int ratio) > +{ > + return iio_backend_op_call(back, oversampling_ratio_set, ratio); > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set, "IIO_BACKEND"); > + Hmm, I'm very late to the party so don't bother in sending another revision unless you have too. But if you do, I would prefer to have this through a write_raw() interface. Meaning we would only have write_raw() as a backend op and then you could add this as a convenient inline helper built on top of write_raw(). So this would be inline with what happens with read_raw(). Anyways, we can clean it up afterwards since we already have a .set_sample_rate() op that could use a similar approach. - Nuno Sá
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:17:13 +0000 Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 15:06 +0200, Antoniu Miclaus wrote: > > Add backend support for setting oversampling ratio. > > > > Reviewed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> > > Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com> > > --- > > no changes in v10. > > drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/iio/backend.h | 5 +++++ > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio- > > backend.c > > index 2088afa7a55c..d4ad36f54090 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c > > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c > > @@ -681,6 +681,21 @@ int iio_backend_data_size_set(struct iio_backend *back, > > unsigned int size) > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_data_size_set, "IIO_BACKEND"); > > > > +/** > > + * iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set - set the oversampling ratio > > + * @back: Backend device > > + * @ratio: The oversampling ratio - value 1 corresponds to no oversampling. > > + * > > + * Return: > > + * 0 on success, negative error number on failure. > > + */ > > +int iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set(struct iio_backend *back, > > + unsigned int ratio) > > +{ > > + return iio_backend_op_call(back, oversampling_ratio_set, ratio); > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set, "IIO_BACKEND"); > > + > > Hmm, I'm very late to the party so don't bother in sending another revision > unless you have too. But if you do, I would prefer to have this through a > write_raw() interface. Meaning we would only have write_raw() as a backend op > and then you could add this as a convenient inline helper built on top of > write_raw(). So this would be inline with what happens with read_raw(). Anyways, > we can clean it up afterwards since we already have a .set_sample_rate() op that > could use a similar approach. I'm not against this, but just to mention that will run into the question of whether to support the more complex value types. I guess for now perhaps pass in val, val2 and the write type and just reject anything that isn't supported by a particular backend. > > - Nuno Sá > >
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.