Add backend support for setting oversampling ratio.
Reviewed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
---
no changes in v10.
drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/iio/backend.h | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c
index 2088afa7a55c..d4ad36f54090 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c
@@ -681,6 +681,21 @@ int iio_backend_data_size_set(struct iio_backend *back, unsigned int size)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_data_size_set, "IIO_BACKEND");
+/**
+ * iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set - set the oversampling ratio
+ * @back: Backend device
+ * @ratio: The oversampling ratio - value 1 corresponds to no oversampling.
+ *
+ * Return:
+ * 0 on success, negative error number on failure.
+ */
+int iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set(struct iio_backend *back,
+ unsigned int ratio)
+{
+ return iio_backend_op_call(back, oversampling_ratio_set, ratio);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set, "IIO_BACKEND");
+
/**
* iio_backend_extend_chan_spec - Extend an IIO channel
* @back: Backend device
diff --git a/include/linux/iio/backend.h b/include/linux/iio/backend.h
index 9ae861a21472..e45b7dfbec35 100644
--- a/include/linux/iio/backend.h
+++ b/include/linux/iio/backend.h
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ enum iio_backend_interface_type {
* @ext_info_get: Extended info getter.
* @interface_type_get: Interface type.
* @data_size_set: Data size.
+ * @oversampling_ratio_set: Set Oversampling ratio.
* @read_raw: Read a channel attribute from a backend device
* @debugfs_print_chan_status: Print channel status into a buffer.
* @debugfs_reg_access: Read or write register value of backend.
@@ -139,6 +140,8 @@ struct iio_backend_ops {
int (*interface_type_get)(struct iio_backend *back,
enum iio_backend_interface_type *type);
int (*data_size_set)(struct iio_backend *back, unsigned int size);
+ int (*oversampling_ratio_set)(struct iio_backend *back,
+ unsigned int ratio);
int (*read_raw)(struct iio_backend *back,
struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int *val, int *val2,
long mask);
@@ -200,6 +203,8 @@ ssize_t iio_backend_ext_info_get(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, uintptr_t private,
int iio_backend_interface_type_get(struct iio_backend *back,
enum iio_backend_interface_type *type);
int iio_backend_data_size_set(struct iio_backend *back, unsigned int size);
+int iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set(struct iio_backend *back,
+ unsigned int ratio);
int iio_backend_read_raw(struct iio_backend *back,
struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int *val, int *val2,
long mask);
--
2.48.1
On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 15:06 +0200, Antoniu Miclaus wrote:
> Add backend support for setting oversampling ratio.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
> ---
> no changes in v10.
> drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> include/linux/iio/backend.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-
> backend.c
> index 2088afa7a55c..d4ad36f54090 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c
> @@ -681,6 +681,21 @@ int iio_backend_data_size_set(struct iio_backend *back,
> unsigned int size)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_data_size_set, "IIO_BACKEND");
>
> +/**
> + * iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set - set the oversampling ratio
> + * @back: Backend device
> + * @ratio: The oversampling ratio - value 1 corresponds to no oversampling.
> + *
> + * Return:
> + * 0 on success, negative error number on failure.
> + */
> +int iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set(struct iio_backend *back,
> + unsigned int ratio)
> +{
> + return iio_backend_op_call(back, oversampling_ratio_set, ratio);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set, "IIO_BACKEND");
> +
Hmm, I'm very late to the party so don't bother in sending another revision
unless you have too. But if you do, I would prefer to have this through a
write_raw() interface. Meaning we would only have write_raw() as a backend op
and then you could add this as a convenient inline helper built on top of
write_raw(). So this would be inline with what happens with read_raw(). Anyways,
we can clean it up afterwards since we already have a .set_sample_rate() op that
could use a similar approach.
- Nuno Sá
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:17:13 +0000
Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-01-17 at 15:06 +0200, Antoniu Miclaus wrote:
> > Add backend support for setting oversampling ratio.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@analog.com>
> > ---
> > no changes in v10.
> > drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/iio/backend.h | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-
> > backend.c
> > index 2088afa7a55c..d4ad36f54090 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c
> > @@ -681,6 +681,21 @@ int iio_backend_data_size_set(struct iio_backend *back,
> > unsigned int size)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_data_size_set, "IIO_BACKEND");
> >
> > +/**
> > + * iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set - set the oversampling ratio
> > + * @back: Backend device
> > + * @ratio: The oversampling ratio - value 1 corresponds to no oversampling.
> > + *
> > + * Return:
> > + * 0 on success, negative error number on failure.
> > + */
> > +int iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set(struct iio_backend *back,
> > + unsigned int ratio)
> > +{
> > + return iio_backend_op_call(back, oversampling_ratio_set, ratio);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set, "IIO_BACKEND");
> > +
>
> Hmm, I'm very late to the party so don't bother in sending another revision
> unless you have too. But if you do, I would prefer to have this through a
> write_raw() interface. Meaning we would only have write_raw() as a backend op
> and then you could add this as a convenient inline helper built on top of
> write_raw(). So this would be inline with what happens with read_raw(). Anyways,
> we can clean it up afterwards since we already have a .set_sample_rate() op that
> could use a similar approach.
I'm not against this, but just to mention that will run into the question of
whether to support the more complex value types. I guess for now perhaps
pass in val, val2 and the write type and just reject anything that isn't
supported by a particular backend.
>
> - Nuno Sá
>
>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.