tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Fix the following warning.
tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c:230:25: warning: Possible null pointer
dereference: payload [nullPointer]
memcpy(RTA_DATA(attr), payload, size);
^
tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c:1618:54: note: Calling function 'rtattr_pack',
4th argument 'NULL' value is 0
if (rtattr_pack(&req.nh, sizeof(req), XFRMA_IF_ID, NULL, 0)) {
^
tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c:230:25: note: Null pointer dereference
memcpy(RTA_DATA(attr), payload, size);
^
Signed-off-by: liuye <liuye@kylinos.cn>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c
index be4a30a0d02a..725310ac26a9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c
@@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ static int rtattr_pack(struct nlmsghdr *nh, size_t req_sz,
attr->rta_len = RTA_LENGTH(size);
attr->rta_type = rta_type;
- memcpy(RTA_DATA(attr), payload, size);
+ if (payload != NULL)
+ memcpy(RTA_DATA(attr), payload, size);
return 0;
}
--
2.25.1
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 03:43:29PM +0800, liuye wrote:
> Fix the following warning.
I think it is a bit more than a warning, I'd phrase this more like,
even as it repeats the subject. Also, it would be nice to cite
the tool that generates the warning.
Address Null pointer dereference in rtattr_pack.
Flagged by ??? as:
>
> tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c:230:25: warning: Possible null pointer
> dereference: payload [nullPointer]
> memcpy(RTA_DATA(attr), payload, size);
> ^
> tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c:1618:54: note: Calling function 'rtattr_pack',
> 4th argument 'NULL' value is 0
> if (rtattr_pack(&req.nh, sizeof(req), XFRMA_IF_ID, NULL, 0)) {
> ^
> tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c:230:25: note: Null pointer dereference
> memcpy(RTA_DATA(attr), payload, size);
> ^
>
And I wonder if a fixes tag is appropriate, and if so this one:
70bfdf62e93a ("selftests/net/ipsec: Add test for xfrm_spdattr_type_t")
And, accordingly if this patch should be targeted at net:
[PATCH net] ...
> Signed-off-by: liuye <liuye@kylinos.cn>
Please consider separating out your family and given name in hte
signed-off-by line. Perhaps Lin Ye (apologies if that is incorrect).
The above not withstanding, the code change looks good to me.
So feel free to include the following in a v2 with an updated patch
description.
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c
> index be4a30a0d02a..725310ac26a9 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c
> @@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ static int rtattr_pack(struct nlmsghdr *nh, size_t req_sz,
>
> attr->rta_len = RTA_LENGTH(size);
> attr->rta_type = rta_type;
> - memcpy(RTA_DATA(attr), payload, size);
> + if (payload != NULL)
I think it would be more idiomatic to express this as:
if (payload)
> + memcpy(RTA_DATA(attr), payload, size);
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
>
From: liuye <liuye@kylinos.cn>
From: Liu Ye <liuye@kylinos.cn>
Address Null pointer dereference in rtattr_pack.
Flagged by cppcheck as:
tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c:230:25: warning: Possible null pointer
dereference: payload [nullPointer]
memcpy(RTA_DATA(attr), payload, size);
^
tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c:1618:54: note: Calling function 'rtattr_pack',
4th argument 'NULL' value is 0
if (rtattr_pack(&req.nh, sizeof(req), XFRMA_IF_ID, NULL, 0)) {
^
tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c:230:25: note: Null pointer dereference
memcpy(RTA_DATA(attr), payload, size);
^
Fixes: 70bfdf62e93a ("selftests/net/ipsec: Add test for xfrm_spdattr_type_t")
---
V2: Modify description.
Add code checking tools.
Separating family and given name in Signed-off-by line.
Modify code format.
Add fixes.
---
Signed-off-by: Liu Ye <liuye@kylinos.cn>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c
index be4a30a0d02a..9b44a091802c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c
@@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ static int rtattr_pack(struct nlmsghdr *nh, size_t req_sz,
attr->rta_len = RTA_LENGTH(size);
attr->rta_type = rta_type;
- memcpy(RTA_DATA(attr), payload, size);
+ if (payload)
+ memcpy(RTA_DATA(attr), payload, size);
return 0;
}
--
2.25.1
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 11:13:22 +0800 Liu Ye wrote:
> From: liuye <liuye@kylinos.cn>
>
> From: Liu Ye <liuye@kylinos.cn>
too many From lines.
> Address Null pointer dereference in rtattr_pack.
I think size is 0 in the bad case, so it's more of an undefinied
behavior.
> Flagged by cppcheck as:
> tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c:230:25: warning: Possible null pointer
> dereference: payload [nullPointer]
> memcpy(RTA_DATA(attr), payload, size);
> ^
> tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c:1618:54: note: Calling function 'rtattr_pack',
> 4th argument 'NULL' value is 0
> if (rtattr_pack(&req.nh, sizeof(req), XFRMA_IF_ID, NULL, 0)) {
> ^
> tools/testing/selftests/net/ipsec.c:230:25: note: Null pointer dereference
> memcpy(RTA_DATA(attr), payload, size);
> ^
> Fixes: 70bfdf62e93a ("selftests/net/ipsec: Add test for xfrm_spdattr_type_t")
Your Sign-off needs to be right after fixes.
> ---
> V2: Modify description.
> Add code checking tools.
> Separating family and given name in Signed-off-by line.
> Modify code format.
> Add fixes.
> ---
Please post v3 as a new thread (not in reply to).
--
pw-bot: cr
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.