drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65219.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
TPS65215 is a Power Management Integrated Circuit (PMIC) that has
significant register map overlap with TPS65219. The series introduces
TPS65215 and restructures the existing driver to support multiple devices.
This follow-up series is dependent on:
Commit f84464ec8190 ("regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65215 PMIC bindings")
Commit 8206c20f4c82 ("mfd: tps65215: Add support for TI TPS65215 PMIC")
Commit 0e0b7f00c111 ("mfd: tps65215: Remove regmap_read check")
TPS65219 Cleanup Series:
GPIO: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241217204755.1011731-1-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com/
MFD: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241217204935.1012106-1-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com/
Reg: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241217204526.1010989-1-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com/
- Both TPS65215 and TPS65219 have 3 Buck regulators.
- TPS65215 has 2 LDOs, whereas TPS65219 has 4 LDOs.
- TPS65215 and TPS65219's LDO1 are the same.
- TPS65215's LDO2 maps to TPS65219's LDO3.
- TPS65215 has 1 GPO, whereas TPS65219 has 2 GPOs.
- The remaining features are the same.
TPS65215 TRM: https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/slvucw5/
AM62L + TPS65215 Test Logs:
https://gist.github.com/ramamoorthyhs/7560eca6110fafc77b51894fa2c0fd22
---
Change Log:
v2 -> v3:
- Correct gpio_chip.ngpio line to use .offset field
- Remove unnecessary newlines
v1 -> v2:
- have any PMIC lists be in alpha-numeric order: TPS65215, then TPS65219
- remove comma after terminator
- Add driver prefix to chip_data struct
---
Shree Ramamoorthy (3):
gpio: tps65215: Add TPS65215 to platform_device_id table
gpio: tps65215: Update GPIO0_IDX macro prefix
gpio tps65215: Add support for varying gpio/offset values
drivers/gpio/gpio-tps65219.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:55 PM Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com> wrote:
>
> TPS65215 is a Power Management Integrated Circuit (PMIC) that has
> significant register map overlap with TPS65219. The series introduces
> TPS65215 and restructures the existing driver to support multiple devices.
>
> This follow-up series is dependent on:
> Commit f84464ec8190 ("regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65215 PMIC bindings")
> Commit 8206c20f4c82 ("mfd: tps65215: Add support for TI TPS65215 PMIC")
> Commit 0e0b7f00c111 ("mfd: tps65215: Remove regmap_read check")
>
Did these go into v6.14?
Bart
Hi,
On 2/7/25 2:53 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:55 PM Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com> wrote:
>> TPS65215 is a Power Management Integrated Circuit (PMIC) that has
>> significant register map overlap with TPS65219. The series introduces
>> TPS65215 and restructures the existing driver to support multiple devices.
>>
>> This follow-up series is dependent on:
>> Commit f84464ec8190 ("regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65215 PMIC bindings")
>> Commit 8206c20f4c82 ("mfd: tps65215: Add support for TI TPS65215 PMIC")
>> Commit 0e0b7f00c111 ("mfd: tps65215: Remove regmap_read check")
>>
> Did these go into v6.14?
>
> Bart
The dependencies listed in the cover letter were just applied by Lee Jones:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/173928615760.2233464.12306998726512431222.b4-ty@kernel.org/
The rest of this series still applies without a need for code modifications.
--
Best,
Shree Ramamoorthy
PMIC Software Engineer
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:12 PM Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On 2/7/25 2:53 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:55 PM Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com> wrote:
> >> TPS65215 is a Power Management Integrated Circuit (PMIC) that has
> >> significant register map overlap with TPS65219. The series introduces
> >> TPS65215 and restructures the existing driver to support multiple devices.
> >>
> >> This follow-up series is dependent on:
> >> Commit f84464ec8190 ("regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65215 PMIC bindings")
> >> Commit 8206c20f4c82 ("mfd: tps65215: Add support for TI TPS65215 PMIC")
> >> Commit 0e0b7f00c111 ("mfd: tps65215: Remove regmap_read check")
> >>
> > Did these go into v6.14?
> >
> > Bart
>
> The dependencies listed in the cover letter were just applied by Lee Jones:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/173928615760.2233464.12306998726512431222.b4-ty@kernel.org/
>
> The rest of this series still applies without a need for code modifications.
>
I'm not sure I'm following: should this series wait until v6.15-rc1 is
tagged? Or did you ask Lee to create an immutable branch? Or doesn't
this series depend on the MFD changes at all after all?
Bart
Hi,
On 2/13/25 2:11 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:12 PM Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 2/7/25 2:53 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:55 PM Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com> wrote:
>>>> TPS65215 is a Power Management Integrated Circuit (PMIC) that has
>>>> significant register map overlap with TPS65219. The series introduces
>>>> TPS65215 and restructures the existing driver to support multiple devices.
>>>>
>>>> This follow-up series is dependent on:
>>>> Commit f84464ec8190 ("regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65215 PMIC bindings")
>>>> Commit 8206c20f4c82 ("mfd: tps65215: Add support for TI TPS65215 PMIC")
>>>> Commit 0e0b7f00c111 ("mfd: tps65215: Remove regmap_read check")
>>>>
>>> Did these go into v6.14?
>>>
>>> Bart
>> The dependencies listed in the cover letter were just applied by Lee Jones:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/173928615760.2233464.12306998726512431222.b4-ty@kernel.org/
>>
>> The rest of this series still applies without a need for code modifications.
>>
> I'm not sure I'm following: should this series wait until v6.15-rc1 is
> tagged? Or did you ask Lee to create an immutable branch? Or doesn't
> this series depend on the MFD changes at all after all?
>
> Bart
Sorry about the confusion. Lee didn't create an immutable branch and the series does depend on the MFD changes,
so this GPIO series should wait till v6.15-rc1 is tagged. Thank you!
--
Best,
Shree Ramamoorthy
PMIC Software Engineer
Hi,
On 2/7/2025 2:53 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 11:55 PM Shree Ramamoorthy <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com> wrote:
>> TPS65215 is a Power Management Integrated Circuit (PMIC) that has
>> significant register map overlap with TPS65219. The series introduces
>> TPS65215 and restructures the existing driver to support multiple devices.
>>
>> This follow-up series is dependent on:
>> Commit f84464ec8190 ("regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65215 PMIC bindings")
>> Commit 8206c20f4c82 ("mfd: tps65215: Add support for TI TPS65215 PMIC")
>> Commit 0e0b7f00c111 ("mfd: tps65215: Remove regmap_read check")
>>
> Did these go into v6.14?
>
> Bart
These didn't. I figured with the dependency feedback, it was easier to combine the series for TPS65215 and TPS65214 into 1 series.
I submitted the combined mfd + dt-binding series [0] first, and once that was ACK'd, I will follow up with the gpio series for both devices.
Let me know if there's a different approach you would recommend!
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250206173725.386720-1-s-ramamoorthy@ti.com/
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.