arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Enable the BANG BANG Thermal Governor to manage the GPIO Fan using
hysteresis on the PHYTEC phyBOARD-Lyra AM625.
Signed-off-by: Garrett Giordano <ggiordano@phytec.com>
---
arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
index c62831e61586..3fd04c689269 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
@@ -690,6 +690,7 @@ CONFIG_SENSORS_RASPBERRYPI_HWMON=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_SL28CPLD=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_INA2XX=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_INA3221=m
+CONFIG_THERMAL_GOV_BANG_BANG=y
CONFIG_THERMAL_GOV_POWER_ALLOCATOR=y
CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL=y
CONFIG_DEVFREQ_THERMAL=y
--
2.25.1
Hey, can someone please take a look at this patch? I can also re-send in case it doesn't apply anymore. Thanks! - Daniel On 1/13/25 19:56, Garrett Giordano wrote: > Enable the BANG BANG Thermal Governor to manage the GPIO Fan using > hysteresis on the PHYTEC phyBOARD-Lyra AM625. > > Signed-off-by: Garrett Giordano <ggiordano@phytec.com> > --- > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > index c62831e61586..3fd04c689269 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig > @@ -690,6 +690,7 @@ CONFIG_SENSORS_RASPBERRYPI_HWMON=m > CONFIG_SENSORS_SL28CPLD=m > CONFIG_SENSORS_INA2XX=m > CONFIG_SENSORS_INA3221=m > +CONFIG_THERMAL_GOV_BANG_BANG=y > CONFIG_THERMAL_GOV_POWER_ALLOCATOR=y > CONFIG_CPU_THERMAL=y > CONFIG_DEVFREQ_THERMAL=y
On 05/05/2025 10:18, Daniel Schultz wrote: > Hey, > > can someone please take a look at this patch? I can also re-send in case > it doesn't apply anymore. Thanks! Sounds like a product thingy, so I do not see much need to enable it in the defconfig. BTW, the more people you CC, the bigger chance no one will fell responsible. You Cc-eed ~7 persons not related to your subsystem. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 5/5/25 10:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 05/05/2025 10:18, Daniel Schultz wrote: >> Hey, >> >> can someone please take a look at this patch? I can also re-send in case >> it doesn't apply anymore. Thanks! > > Sounds like a product thingy, so I do not see much need to enable it in > the defconfig. I'm okay with that. We can handle that downstream but wasn't sure if this config would be accepted. > > BTW, the more people you CC, the bigger chance no one will fell > responsible. You Cc-eed ~7 persons not related to your subsystem. Ah, yes that makes sense. Thank you for the hint! - Daniel > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.