Capacity is stranded when CFMWS regions are not aligned to block size.
On x86, block size increases with capacity (2G blocks @ 64G capacity).
Use CFMWS base/size to report memory block size alignment advice.
Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Tested-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
---
drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
index 59fffe34c9d0..7526119fe945 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/memblock.h>
+#include <linux/memory.h>
#include <linux/numa.h>
#include <linux/nodemask.h>
#include <linux/topology.h>
@@ -425,13 +426,22 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
{
struct acpi_cedt_cfmws *cfmws;
int *fake_pxm = arg;
- u64 start, end;
+ u64 start, end, align;
int node;
cfmws = (struct acpi_cedt_cfmws *)header;
start = cfmws->base_hpa;
end = cfmws->base_hpa + cfmws->window_size;
+ /* Align memblock size to CFMW regions if possible */
+ align = 1UL << __ffs(start | end);
+ if (align >= SZ_256M) {
+ if (memory_block_advise_max_size(align) < 0)
+ pr_warn("CFMWS: memblock size advise failed\n");
+ } else {
+ pr_err("CFMWS: [BIOS BUG] base/size alignment violates spec\n");
+ }
+
/*
* The SRAT may have already described NUMA details for all,
* or a portion of, this CFMWS HPA range. Extend the memblks
--
2.47.1
Gregory Price wrote:
> Capacity is stranded when CFMWS regions are not aligned to block size.
> On x86, block size increases with capacity (2G blocks @ 64G capacity).
>
> Use CFMWS base/size to report memory block size alignment advice.
>
> Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> index 59fffe34c9d0..7526119fe945 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/memblock.h>
> +#include <linux/memory.h>
> #include <linux/numa.h>
> #include <linux/nodemask.h>
> #include <linux/topology.h>
> @@ -425,13 +426,22 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> {
> struct acpi_cedt_cfmws *cfmws;
> int *fake_pxm = arg;
> - u64 start, end;
> + u64 start, end, align;
> int node;
>
> cfmws = (struct acpi_cedt_cfmws *)header;
> start = cfmws->base_hpa;
> end = cfmws->base_hpa + cfmws->window_size;
>
> + /* Align memblock size to CFMW regions if possible */
> + align = 1UL << __ffs(start | end);
> + if (align >= SZ_256M) {
> + if (memory_block_advise_max_size(align) < 0)
> + pr_warn("CFMWS: memblock size advise failed\n");
I wonder if it would be good to print the return value here so the user
knows why this failed?
But either way.
Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> + } else {
> + pr_err("CFMWS: [BIOS BUG] base/size alignment violates spec\n");
> + }
> +
> /*
> * The SRAT may have already described NUMA details for all,
> * or a portion of, this CFMWS HPA range. Extend the memblks
> --
> 2.47.1
>
>
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 02:59:22PM -0600, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Gregory Price wrote:
> > + /* Align memblock size to CFMW regions if possible */
> > + align = 1UL << __ffs(start | end);
> > + if (align >= SZ_256M) {
> > + if (memory_block_advise_max_size(align) < 0)
> > + pr_warn("CFMWS: memblock size advise failed\n");
>
> I wonder if it would be good to print the return value here so the user
> knows why this failed?
>
As someone who is often annoyed by this exact pattern, I am apparently
just as guilty at producing it *facepalm*
I'll pick this up and push it tomorrow.
> But either way.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
>
> > + } else {
> > + pr_err("CFMWS: [BIOS BUG] base/size alignment violates spec\n");
> > + }
> > +
> > /*
> > * The SRAT may have already described NUMA details for all,
> > * or a portion of, this CFMWS HPA range. Extend the memblks
> > --
> > 2.47.1
> >
> >
>
>
On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 6:44 PM Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net> wrote:
>
> Capacity is stranded when CFMWS regions are not aligned to block size.
> On x86, block size increases with capacity (2G blocks @ 64G capacity).
>
> Use CFMWS base/size to report memory block size alignment advice.
>
> Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Fan Ni <fan.ni@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> index 59fffe34c9d0..7526119fe945 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/memblock.h>
> +#include <linux/memory.h>
> #include <linux/numa.h>
> #include <linux/nodemask.h>
> #include <linux/topology.h>
> @@ -425,13 +426,22 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
> {
> struct acpi_cedt_cfmws *cfmws;
> int *fake_pxm = arg;
> - u64 start, end;
> + u64 start, end, align;
> int node;
>
> cfmws = (struct acpi_cedt_cfmws *)header;
> start = cfmws->base_hpa;
> end = cfmws->base_hpa + cfmws->window_size;
>
> + /* Align memblock size to CFMW regions if possible */
> + align = 1UL << __ffs(start | end);
> + if (align >= SZ_256M) {
> + if (memory_block_advise_max_size(align) < 0)
> + pr_warn("CFMWS: memblock size advise failed\n");
> + } else {
> + pr_err("CFMWS: [BIOS BUG] base/size alignment violates spec\n");
> + }
> +
> /*
> * The SRAT may have already described NUMA details for all,
> * or a portion of, this CFMWS HPA range. Extend the memblks
> --
> 2.47.1
>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.