arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
The x86 OF code reports the missing IO-APIC wihtout any
checks whether the IO-APIC presence is required or not.
That is due to that part of the code being dovetailed to
the Intel MID platform.
Check if the IO-APIC must be available. Log the error only
when the IO-APIC is expected to be present.
Signed-off-by: Roman Kisel <romank@linux.microsoft.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c b/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
index 59d23cdf4ed0..5b3b47930d1c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
@@ -47,6 +47,15 @@ static struct of_device_id __initdata ce4100_ids[] = {
{},
};
+static bool falconfalls_compatible(void)
+{
+ if (!of_have_populated_dt())
+ return false;
+
+ return of_flat_dt_is_compatible(
+ of_get_flat_dt_root(), "intel,falconfalls");
+}
+
static int __init add_bus_probe(void)
{
if (!of_have_populated_dt())
@@ -259,12 +268,20 @@ static void __init dtb_ioapic_setup(void)
for_each_compatible_node(dn, NULL, "intel,ce4100-ioapic")
dtb_add_ioapic(dn);
+ if (!nr_ioapics && falconfalls_compatible())
+ pr_err("Error: No information about IO-APIC in OF.\n");
- if (nr_ioapics) {
+ if (nr_ioapics)
of_ioapic = 1;
- return;
- }
- pr_err("Error: No information about IO-APIC in OF.\n");
+
+ /*
+ * At this point, it might so happen that no IO-APIC has been discovered.
+ *
+ * A general assumption would be that most x86 boards have IO-APIC,
+ * yet that is not something the kernel should report as a firmware
+ * bug unconditionally as there are setups (VMs would be an easy example)
+ * that are able to employ other means of interrupt routing.
+ */
}
#else
static void __init dtb_ioapic_setup(void) {}
base-commit: eea6e4b4dfb8859446177c32961c96726d0117be
--
2.34.1
Hi Roman,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on eea6e4b4dfb8859446177c32961c96726d0117be]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Roman-Kisel/x86-of-Don-t-log-error-on-the-missing-IO-APIC-unconditionally/20250110-024320
base: eea6e4b4dfb8859446177c32961c96726d0117be
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109184015.1674388-1-romank%40linux.microsoft.com
patch subject: [PATCH] x86/of: Don't log error on the missing IO-APIC unconditionally
config: i386-randconfig-004-20250111 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250111/202501110358.e3qQDC6q-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250111/202501110358.e3qQDC6q-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501110358.e3qQDC6q-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c:50:13: warning: 'falconfalls_compatible' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
50 | static bool falconfalls_compatible(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/falconfalls_compatible +50 arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c
49
> 50 static bool falconfalls_compatible(void)
51 {
52 if (!of_have_populated_dt())
53 return false;
54
55 return of_flat_dt_is_compatible(
56 of_get_flat_dt_root(), "intel,falconfalls");
57 }
58
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.