Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c

between commit:

  6df90c02bae4 ("dm-verity FEC: Fix RS FEC repair for roots unaligned to block size (take 2)")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  5c292ac6e69f ("block: Delete bio_prio()")

from the block tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c
index e61855da6461,b0ee199009fc..000000000000
--- a/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c
@@@ -121,8 -132,7 +121,8 @@@ static int fec_decode_bufs(struct dm_ve
  	u8 *par, *block;
  	struct bio *bio = dm_bio_from_per_bio_data(io, v->ti->per_io_data_size);
  
 -	par = fec_read_parity(v, rsb, block_offset, &offset, &buf, bio->bi_ioprio);
 +	par = fec_read_parity(v, rsb, block_offset, &offset,
- 			      par_buf_offset, &buf, bio_prio(bio));
++			      par_buf_offset, &buf, bio->bi_ioprio);
  	if (IS_ERR(par))
  		return PTR_ERR(par);
  
@@@ -163,8 -160,7 +163,8 @@@
  		if (offset >= v->fec->io_size) {
  			dm_bufio_release(buf);
  
 -			par = fec_read_parity(v, rsb, block_offset, &offset, &buf, bio->bi_ioprio);
 +			par = fec_read_parity(v, rsb, block_offset, &offset,
- 					      par_buf_offset, &buf, bio_prio(bio));
++					      par_buf_offset, &buf, bio->bi_ioprio);
  			if (IS_ERR(par))
  				return PTR_ERR(par);
  		}

On 1/8/25 6:46 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/md/dm-verity-fec.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   6df90c02bae4 ("dm-verity FEC: Fix RS FEC repair for roots unaligned to block size (take 2)")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   5c292ac6e69f ("block: Delete bio_prio()")
> 
> from the block tree.

Thanks, I resolved this in my for-next branch now.

-- 
Jens Axboe