Unnecessary parentheses in boolean comparisons make it harder to read.

Removed the extra parentheses on line 305 for code readability.

Signed-off-by: Will Walsh <iron.will.walsh@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
index 2f05e761fb9a..dfb5322964de 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ int gbaudio_module_update(struct gbaudio_codec_info *codec,
 	dev_dbg(module->dev, "%s:Module update %s sequence\n", w->name,
 		enable ? "Enable" : "Disable");
 
-	if ((w->id != snd_soc_dapm_aif_in) && (w->id != snd_soc_dapm_aif_out)) {
+	if (w->id != snd_soc_dapm_aif_in && w->id != snd_soc_dapm_aif_out) {
 		dev_dbg(codec->dev, "No action required for %s\n", w->name);
 		return 0;
 	}
-- 
2.45.2

On 1/8/25 6:36 PM, Will Walsh wrote:
> Unnecessary parentheses in boolean comparisons make it harder to read.
> 
> Removed the extra parentheses on line 305 for code readability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Will Walsh <iron.will.walsh@gmail.com>

I'm not sure this makes a big difference in readability but I
personally avoid extra parentheses unless adding them makes a
compiler warning go away.

Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@kernel.org>

> ---
>   drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
> index 2f05e761fb9a..dfb5322964de 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_codec.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ int gbaudio_module_update(struct gbaudio_codec_info *codec,
>   	dev_dbg(module->dev, "%s:Module update %s sequence\n", w->name,
>   		enable ? "Enable" : "Disable");
>   
> -	if ((w->id != snd_soc_dapm_aif_in) && (w->id != snd_soc_dapm_aif_out)) {
> +	if (w->id != snd_soc_dapm_aif_in && w->id != snd_soc_dapm_aif_out) {
>   		dev_dbg(codec->dev, "No action required for %s\n", w->name);
>   		return 0;
>   	}

On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 08:56:50PM -0600, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 1/8/25 6:36 PM, Will Walsh wrote:
> > Unnecessary parentheses in boolean comparisons make it harder to read.
> > 
> > Removed the extra parentheses on line 305 for code readability.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Will Walsh <iron.will.walsh@gmail.com>
> 
> I'm not sure this makes a big difference in readability but I
> personally avoid extra parentheses unless adding them makes a
> compiler warning go away.

It's not a compiler warning, it checkpatch.

regards,
dan carpenter

On 1/9/25 1:45 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 08:56:50PM -0600, Alex Elder wrote:
>> On 1/8/25 6:36 PM, Will Walsh wrote:
>>> Unnecessary parentheses in boolean comparisons make it harder to read.
>>>
>>> Removed the extra parentheses on line 305 for code readability.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Will Walsh <iron.will.walsh@gmail.com>
>>
>> I'm not sure this makes a big difference in readability but I
>> personally avoid extra parentheses unless adding them makes a
>> compiler warning go away.
> 
> It's not a compiler warning, it checkpatch.

I meant compiler "-Wparentheses" warnings, like "suggest
parentheses around ‘+’ inside ‘<<’".

But anyway, I have no problem with this being rejected,
it doesn't really add value, and to some, it subtracts.

					-Alex

> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 

On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 10:45:50AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 08:56:50PM -0600, Alex Elder wrote:
> > On 1/8/25 6:36 PM, Will Walsh wrote:
> > > Unnecessary parentheses in boolean comparisons make it harder to read.
> > > 
> > > Removed the extra parentheses on line 305 for code readability.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Will Walsh <iron.will.walsh@gmail.com>
> > 
> > I'm not sure this makes a big difference in readability but I
> > personally avoid extra parentheses unless adding them makes a
> > compiler warning go away.
> 
> It's not a compiler warning, it checkpatch.

And it is a checkpatch warning that I HATE and keep rejecting, here's
where I did so yesterday:
	https://lore.kernel.org/r/2025010738-gong-rewind-2583@gregkh

Will, sorry, but I don't want to take this.

greg k-h