[PATCH RFC 1/4] drm/msm/adreno: Add speedbin support for X1-85

Akhil P Oommen posted 4 patches 1 year, 1 month ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH RFC 1/4] drm/msm/adreno: Add speedbin support for X1-85
Posted by Akhil P Oommen 1 year, 1 month ago
Adreno X1-85 has an additional bit which is at a non-contiguous
location in qfprom. Add support for this new "hi" bit along with
the speedbin mappings.
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c |  5 +++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c   | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
index 0c560e84ad5a53bb4e8a49ba4e153ce9cf33f7ae..e2261f50aabc6a2f931d810f3637dfdba5695f43 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
@@ -1412,6 +1412,11 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
 			.gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
 		},
 		.address_space_size = SZ_256G,
+		.speedbins = ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(
+			{ 0,   0 },
+			{ 263, 1 },
+			{ 315, 0 },
+		),
 		.preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
 	}, {
 		.chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x43051401), /* "C520v2" */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
index 75f5367e73caace4648491b041f80b7c4d26bf89..7b31379eff444cf3f8ed0dcfd23c14920c13ee9d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
@@ -1078,7 +1078,20 @@ void adreno_gpu_ocmem_cleanup(struct adreno_ocmem *adreno_ocmem)
 
 int adreno_read_speedbin(struct device *dev, u32 *speedbin)
 {
-	return nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
+	u32 hi_bits = 0;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Some chipsets have MSB bits (BIT(8) and above) at a non-contiguous location */
+	ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin_hi", &hi_bits);
+	if (ret != -ENOENT)
+		return ret;
+
+	*speedbin |= (hi_bits << 8);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 int adreno_gpu_init(struct drm_device *drm, struct platform_device *pdev,

-- 
2.45.2
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] drm/msm/adreno: Add speedbin support for X1-85
Posted by Konrad Dybcio 1 year, 1 month ago
On 8.01.2025 11:42 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> Adreno X1-85 has an additional bit which is at a non-contiguous
> location in qfprom. Add support for this new "hi" bit along with
> the speedbin mappings.
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c |  5 +++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c   | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> index 0c560e84ad5a53bb4e8a49ba4e153ce9cf33f7ae..e2261f50aabc6a2f931d810f3637dfdba5695f43 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> @@ -1412,6 +1412,11 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
>  			.gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
>  		},
>  		.address_space_size = SZ_256G,
> +		.speedbins = ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(
> +			{ 0,   0 },
> +			{ 263, 1 },
> +			{ 315, 0 },
> +		),
>  		.preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
>  	}, {
>  		.chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x43051401), /* "C520v2" */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> index 75f5367e73caace4648491b041f80b7c4d26bf89..7b31379eff444cf3f8ed0dcfd23c14920c13ee9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> @@ -1078,7 +1078,20 @@ void adreno_gpu_ocmem_cleanup(struct adreno_ocmem *adreno_ocmem)
>  
>  int adreno_read_speedbin(struct device *dev, u32 *speedbin)
>  {
> -	return nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
> +	u32 hi_bits = 0;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Some chipsets have MSB bits (BIT(8) and above) at a non-contiguous location */
> +	ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin_hi", &hi_bits);
> +	if (ret != -ENOENT)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	*speedbin |= (hi_bits << 8);

Now that we're overwriting speedbin, we should probably have some checks in
order to make sure somebody passing a too-wide cell to one of these won't
result in cripplingly-untraceable value corruption

I guess we could just introduce nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u8() and call it
a day?

Konrad
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] drm/msm/adreno: Add speedbin support for X1-85
Posted by Akhil P Oommen 1 year ago
On 1/9/2025 7:27 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 8.01.2025 11:42 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> Adreno X1-85 has an additional bit which is at a non-contiguous
>> location in qfprom. Add support for this new "hi" bit along with
>> the speedbin mappings.
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c |  5 +++++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c   | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>> index 0c560e84ad5a53bb4e8a49ba4e153ce9cf33f7ae..e2261f50aabc6a2f931d810f3637dfdba5695f43 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>> @@ -1412,6 +1412,11 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
>>  			.gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
>>  		},
>>  		.address_space_size = SZ_256G,
>> +		.speedbins = ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(
>> +			{ 0,   0 },
>> +			{ 263, 1 },
>> +			{ 315, 0 },
>> +		),
>>  		.preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
>>  	}, {
>>  		.chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x43051401), /* "C520v2" */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>> index 75f5367e73caace4648491b041f80b7c4d26bf89..7b31379eff444cf3f8ed0dcfd23c14920c13ee9d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>> @@ -1078,7 +1078,20 @@ void adreno_gpu_ocmem_cleanup(struct adreno_ocmem *adreno_ocmem)
>>  
>>  int adreno_read_speedbin(struct device *dev, u32 *speedbin)
>>  {
>> -	return nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
>> +	u32 hi_bits = 0;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	/* Some chipsets have MSB bits (BIT(8) and above) at a non-contiguous location */
>> +	ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin_hi", &hi_bits);
>> +	if (ret != -ENOENT)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	*speedbin |= (hi_bits << 8);
> 
> Now that we're overwriting speedbin, we should probably have some checks in
> order to make sure somebody passing a too-wide cell to one of these won't
> result in cripplingly-untraceable value corruption
> 
> I guess we could just introduce nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u8() and call it
> a day?

X1E is an outlier here, because this was fixed from the next chipset
onward. For newer chipsets, we can use just the "speed_bin" node, which
represents a contiguous 9 bits. So, just do a "WARN_ON(fls(speedbin) >
8)" here?

-Akhil.

> 
> Konrad
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] drm/msm/adreno: Add speedbin support for X1-85
Posted by Dmitry Baryshkov 1 year ago
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 01:07:17AM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On 1/9/2025 7:27 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > On 8.01.2025 11:42 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> >> Adreno X1-85 has an additional bit which is at a non-contiguous
> >> location in qfprom. Add support for this new "hi" bit along with
> >> the speedbin mappings.
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c |  5 +++++
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c   | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> >>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> >> index 0c560e84ad5a53bb4e8a49ba4e153ce9cf33f7ae..e2261f50aabc6a2f931d810f3637dfdba5695f43 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> >> @@ -1412,6 +1412,11 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
> >>  			.gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
> >>  		},
> >>  		.address_space_size = SZ_256G,
> >> +		.speedbins = ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(
> >> +			{ 0,   0 },
> >> +			{ 263, 1 },
> >> +			{ 315, 0 },
> >> +		),
> >>  		.preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
> >>  	}, {
> >>  		.chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x43051401), /* "C520v2" */
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> >> index 75f5367e73caace4648491b041f80b7c4d26bf89..7b31379eff444cf3f8ed0dcfd23c14920c13ee9d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> >> @@ -1078,7 +1078,20 @@ void adreno_gpu_ocmem_cleanup(struct adreno_ocmem *adreno_ocmem)
> >>  
> >>  int adreno_read_speedbin(struct device *dev, u32 *speedbin)
> >>  {
> >> -	return nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
> >> +	u32 hi_bits = 0;
> >> +	int ret;
> >> +
> >> +	ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
> >> +	if (ret)
> >> +		return ret;
> >> +
> >> +	/* Some chipsets have MSB bits (BIT(8) and above) at a non-contiguous location */
> >> +	ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin_hi", &hi_bits);
> >> +	if (ret != -ENOENT)
> >> +		return ret;
> >> +
> >> +	*speedbin |= (hi_bits << 8);
> > 
> > Now that we're overwriting speedbin, we should probably have some checks in
> > order to make sure somebody passing a too-wide cell to one of these won't
> > result in cripplingly-untraceable value corruption
> > 
> > I guess we could just introduce nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u8() and call it
> > a day?
> 
> X1E is an outlier here, because this was fixed from the next chipset
> onward. For newer chipsets, we can use just the "speed_bin" node, which
> represents a contiguous 9 bits. So, just do a "WARN_ON(fls(speedbin) >
> 8)" here?

Or extend nvmem core to support non-contiguous fields.

> 
> -Akhil.
> 
> > 
> > Konrad
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] drm/msm/adreno: Add speedbin support for X1-85
Posted by Konrad Dybcio 1 year ago
On 15.01.2025 8:59 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 01:07:17AM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> On 1/9/2025 7:27 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 8.01.2025 11:42 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>>> Adreno X1-85 has an additional bit which is at a non-contiguous
>>>> location in qfprom. Add support for this new "hi" bit along with
>>>> the speedbin mappings.
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c |  5 +++++
>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c   | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>>>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>> index 0c560e84ad5a53bb4e8a49ba4e153ce9cf33f7ae..e2261f50aabc6a2f931d810f3637dfdba5695f43 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>> @@ -1412,6 +1412,11 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
>>>>  			.gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
>>>>  		},
>>>>  		.address_space_size = SZ_256G,
>>>> +		.speedbins = ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(
>>>> +			{ 0,   0 },
>>>> +			{ 263, 1 },
>>>> +			{ 315, 0 },
>>>> +		),
>>>>  		.preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
>>>>  	}, {
>>>>  		.chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x43051401), /* "C520v2" */
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>> index 75f5367e73caace4648491b041f80b7c4d26bf89..7b31379eff444cf3f8ed0dcfd23c14920c13ee9d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>> @@ -1078,7 +1078,20 @@ void adreno_gpu_ocmem_cleanup(struct adreno_ocmem *adreno_ocmem)
>>>>  
>>>>  int adreno_read_speedbin(struct device *dev, u32 *speedbin)
>>>>  {
>>>> -	return nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
>>>> +	u32 hi_bits = 0;
>>>> +	int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +	ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
>>>> +	if (ret)
>>>> +		return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +	/* Some chipsets have MSB bits (BIT(8) and above) at a non-contiguous location */
>>>> +	ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin_hi", &hi_bits);
>>>> +	if (ret != -ENOENT)
>>>> +		return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +	*speedbin |= (hi_bits << 8);
>>>
>>> Now that we're overwriting speedbin, we should probably have some checks in
>>> order to make sure somebody passing a too-wide cell to one of these won't
>>> result in cripplingly-untraceable value corruption
>>>
>>> I guess we could just introduce nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u8() and call it
>>> a day?
>>
>> X1E is an outlier here, because this was fixed from the next chipset
>> onward. For newer chipsets, we can use just the "speed_bin" node, which
>> represents a contiguous 9 bits. So, just do a "WARN_ON(fls(speedbin) >
>> 8)" here?
> 
> Or extend nvmem core to support non-contiguous fields.

This sounds more desirable, as we surely aren't the only ones with
such a "feature"..

Konrad
Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] drm/msm/adreno: Add speedbin support for X1-85
Posted by Akhil P Oommen 1 year ago
On 1/17/2025 2:46 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 15.01.2025 8:59 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 01:07:17AM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>> On 1/9/2025 7:27 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> On 8.01.2025 11:42 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>>>> Adreno X1-85 has an additional bit which is at a non-contiguous
>>>>> location in qfprom. Add support for this new "hi" bit along with
>>>>> the speedbin mappings.
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c |  5 +++++
>>>>>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c   | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>>>>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>>> index 0c560e84ad5a53bb4e8a49ba4e153ce9cf33f7ae..e2261f50aabc6a2f931d810f3637dfdba5695f43 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>>> @@ -1412,6 +1412,11 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
>>>>>  			.gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
>>>>>  		},
>>>>>  		.address_space_size = SZ_256G,
>>>>> +		.speedbins = ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(
>>>>> +			{ 0,   0 },
>>>>> +			{ 263, 1 },
>>>>> +			{ 315, 0 },
>>>>> +		),
>>>>>  		.preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
>>>>>  	}, {
>>>>>  		.chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x43051401), /* "C520v2" */
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>>> index 75f5367e73caace4648491b041f80b7c4d26bf89..7b31379eff444cf3f8ed0dcfd23c14920c13ee9d 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>>> @@ -1078,7 +1078,20 @@ void adreno_gpu_ocmem_cleanup(struct adreno_ocmem *adreno_ocmem)
>>>>>  
>>>>>  int adreno_read_speedbin(struct device *dev, u32 *speedbin)
>>>>>  {
>>>>> -	return nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
>>>>> +	u32 hi_bits = 0;
>>>>> +	int ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
>>>>> +	if (ret)
>>>>> +		return ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	/* Some chipsets have MSB bits (BIT(8) and above) at a non-contiguous location */
>>>>> +	ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin_hi", &hi_bits);
>>>>> +	if (ret != -ENOENT)
>>>>> +		return ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	*speedbin |= (hi_bits << 8);
>>>>
>>>> Now that we're overwriting speedbin, we should probably have some checks in
>>>> order to make sure somebody passing a too-wide cell to one of these won't
>>>> result in cripplingly-untraceable value corruption
>>>>
>>>> I guess we could just introduce nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u8() and call it
>>>> a day?
>>>
>>> X1E is an outlier here, because this was fixed from the next chipset
>>> onward. For newer chipsets, we can use just the "speed_bin" node, which
>>> represents a contiguous 9 bits. So, just do a "WARN_ON(fls(speedbin) >
>>> 8)" here?
>>
>> Or extend nvmem core to support non-contiguous fields.
> 
> This sounds more desirable, as we surely aren't the only ones with
> such a "feature"..

Sounds good. I can explore that when I am back from vacation early next
month.

-Akhil.

> 
> Konrad