Adreno X1-85 has an additional bit which is at a non-contiguous
location in qfprom. Add support for this new "hi" bit along with
the speedbin mappings.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c | 5 +++++
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
index 0c560e84ad5a53bb4e8a49ba4e153ce9cf33f7ae..e2261f50aabc6a2f931d810f3637dfdba5695f43 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
@@ -1412,6 +1412,11 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
.gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
},
.address_space_size = SZ_256G,
+ .speedbins = ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(
+ { 0, 0 },
+ { 263, 1 },
+ { 315, 0 },
+ ),
.preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
}, {
.chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x43051401), /* "C520v2" */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
index 75f5367e73caace4648491b041f80b7c4d26bf89..7b31379eff444cf3f8ed0dcfd23c14920c13ee9d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
@@ -1078,7 +1078,20 @@ void adreno_gpu_ocmem_cleanup(struct adreno_ocmem *adreno_ocmem)
int adreno_read_speedbin(struct device *dev, u32 *speedbin)
{
- return nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
+ u32 hi_bits = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Some chipsets have MSB bits (BIT(8) and above) at a non-contiguous location */
+ ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin_hi", &hi_bits);
+ if (ret != -ENOENT)
+ return ret;
+
+ *speedbin |= (hi_bits << 8);
+ return 0;
}
int adreno_gpu_init(struct drm_device *drm, struct platform_device *pdev,
--
2.45.2
On 8.01.2025 11:42 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> Adreno X1-85 has an additional bit which is at a non-contiguous
> location in qfprom. Add support for this new "hi" bit along with
> the speedbin mappings.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c | 5 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> index 0c560e84ad5a53bb4e8a49ba4e153ce9cf33f7ae..e2261f50aabc6a2f931d810f3637dfdba5695f43 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> @@ -1412,6 +1412,11 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
> .gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
> },
> .address_space_size = SZ_256G,
> + .speedbins = ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(
> + { 0, 0 },
> + { 263, 1 },
> + { 315, 0 },
> + ),
> .preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
> }, {
> .chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x43051401), /* "C520v2" */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> index 75f5367e73caace4648491b041f80b7c4d26bf89..7b31379eff444cf3f8ed0dcfd23c14920c13ee9d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> @@ -1078,7 +1078,20 @@ void adreno_gpu_ocmem_cleanup(struct adreno_ocmem *adreno_ocmem)
>
> int adreno_read_speedbin(struct device *dev, u32 *speedbin)
> {
> - return nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
> + u32 hi_bits = 0;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Some chipsets have MSB bits (BIT(8) and above) at a non-contiguous location */
> + ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin_hi", &hi_bits);
> + if (ret != -ENOENT)
> + return ret;
> +
> + *speedbin |= (hi_bits << 8);
Now that we're overwriting speedbin, we should probably have some checks in
order to make sure somebody passing a too-wide cell to one of these won't
result in cripplingly-untraceable value corruption
I guess we could just introduce nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u8() and call it
a day?
Konrad
On 1/9/2025 7:27 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 8.01.2025 11:42 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> Adreno X1-85 has an additional bit which is at a non-contiguous
>> location in qfprom. Add support for this new "hi" bit along with
>> the speedbin mappings.
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c | 5 +++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>> index 0c560e84ad5a53bb4e8a49ba4e153ce9cf33f7ae..e2261f50aabc6a2f931d810f3637dfdba5695f43 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>> @@ -1412,6 +1412,11 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
>> .gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
>> },
>> .address_space_size = SZ_256G,
>> + .speedbins = ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(
>> + { 0, 0 },
>> + { 263, 1 },
>> + { 315, 0 },
>> + ),
>> .preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
>> }, {
>> .chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x43051401), /* "C520v2" */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>> index 75f5367e73caace4648491b041f80b7c4d26bf89..7b31379eff444cf3f8ed0dcfd23c14920c13ee9d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>> @@ -1078,7 +1078,20 @@ void adreno_gpu_ocmem_cleanup(struct adreno_ocmem *adreno_ocmem)
>>
>> int adreno_read_speedbin(struct device *dev, u32 *speedbin)
>> {
>> - return nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
>> + u32 hi_bits = 0;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* Some chipsets have MSB bits (BIT(8) and above) at a non-contiguous location */
>> + ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin_hi", &hi_bits);
>> + if (ret != -ENOENT)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + *speedbin |= (hi_bits << 8);
>
> Now that we're overwriting speedbin, we should probably have some checks in
> order to make sure somebody passing a too-wide cell to one of these won't
> result in cripplingly-untraceable value corruption
>
> I guess we could just introduce nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u8() and call it
> a day?
X1E is an outlier here, because this was fixed from the next chipset
onward. For newer chipsets, we can use just the "speed_bin" node, which
represents a contiguous 9 bits. So, just do a "WARN_ON(fls(speedbin) >
8)" here?
-Akhil.
>
> Konrad
On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 01:07:17AM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On 1/9/2025 7:27 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> > On 8.01.2025 11:42 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> >> Adreno X1-85 has an additional bit which is at a non-contiguous
> >> location in qfprom. Add support for this new "hi" bit along with
> >> the speedbin mappings.
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c | 5 +++++
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> >> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> >> index 0c560e84ad5a53bb4e8a49ba4e153ce9cf33f7ae..e2261f50aabc6a2f931d810f3637dfdba5695f43 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
> >> @@ -1412,6 +1412,11 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
> >> .gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
> >> },
> >> .address_space_size = SZ_256G,
> >> + .speedbins = ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(
> >> + { 0, 0 },
> >> + { 263, 1 },
> >> + { 315, 0 },
> >> + ),
> >> .preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
> >> }, {
> >> .chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x43051401), /* "C520v2" */
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> >> index 75f5367e73caace4648491b041f80b7c4d26bf89..7b31379eff444cf3f8ed0dcfd23c14920c13ee9d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> >> @@ -1078,7 +1078,20 @@ void adreno_gpu_ocmem_cleanup(struct adreno_ocmem *adreno_ocmem)
> >>
> >> int adreno_read_speedbin(struct device *dev, u32 *speedbin)
> >> {
> >> - return nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
> >> + u32 hi_bits = 0;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + /* Some chipsets have MSB bits (BIT(8) and above) at a non-contiguous location */
> >> + ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin_hi", &hi_bits);
> >> + if (ret != -ENOENT)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + *speedbin |= (hi_bits << 8);
> >
> > Now that we're overwriting speedbin, we should probably have some checks in
> > order to make sure somebody passing a too-wide cell to one of these won't
> > result in cripplingly-untraceable value corruption
> >
> > I guess we could just introduce nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u8() and call it
> > a day?
>
> X1E is an outlier here, because this was fixed from the next chipset
> onward. For newer chipsets, we can use just the "speed_bin" node, which
> represents a contiguous 9 bits. So, just do a "WARN_ON(fls(speedbin) >
> 8)" here?
Or extend nvmem core to support non-contiguous fields.
>
> -Akhil.
>
> >
> > Konrad
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
On 15.01.2025 8:59 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 01:07:17AM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> On 1/9/2025 7:27 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 8.01.2025 11:42 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>>> Adreno X1-85 has an additional bit which is at a non-contiguous
>>>> location in qfprom. Add support for this new "hi" bit along with
>>>> the speedbin mappings.
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c | 5 +++++
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>> index 0c560e84ad5a53bb4e8a49ba4e153ce9cf33f7ae..e2261f50aabc6a2f931d810f3637dfdba5695f43 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>> @@ -1412,6 +1412,11 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
>>>> .gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
>>>> },
>>>> .address_space_size = SZ_256G,
>>>> + .speedbins = ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(
>>>> + { 0, 0 },
>>>> + { 263, 1 },
>>>> + { 315, 0 },
>>>> + ),
>>>> .preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
>>>> }, {
>>>> .chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x43051401), /* "C520v2" */
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>> index 75f5367e73caace4648491b041f80b7c4d26bf89..7b31379eff444cf3f8ed0dcfd23c14920c13ee9d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>> @@ -1078,7 +1078,20 @@ void adreno_gpu_ocmem_cleanup(struct adreno_ocmem *adreno_ocmem)
>>>>
>>>> int adreno_read_speedbin(struct device *dev, u32 *speedbin)
>>>> {
>>>> - return nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
>>>> + u32 hi_bits = 0;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Some chipsets have MSB bits (BIT(8) and above) at a non-contiguous location */
>>>> + ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin_hi", &hi_bits);
>>>> + if (ret != -ENOENT)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + *speedbin |= (hi_bits << 8);
>>>
>>> Now that we're overwriting speedbin, we should probably have some checks in
>>> order to make sure somebody passing a too-wide cell to one of these won't
>>> result in cripplingly-untraceable value corruption
>>>
>>> I guess we could just introduce nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u8() and call it
>>> a day?
>>
>> X1E is an outlier here, because this was fixed from the next chipset
>> onward. For newer chipsets, we can use just the "speed_bin" node, which
>> represents a contiguous 9 bits. So, just do a "WARN_ON(fls(speedbin) >
>> 8)" here?
>
> Or extend nvmem core to support non-contiguous fields.
This sounds more desirable, as we surely aren't the only ones with
such a "feature"..
Konrad
On 1/17/2025 2:46 AM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 15.01.2025 8:59 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 01:07:17AM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>> On 1/9/2025 7:27 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> On 8.01.2025 11:42 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>>>> Adreno X1-85 has an additional bit which is at a non-contiguous
>>>>> location in qfprom. Add support for this new "hi" bit along with
>>>>> the speedbin mappings.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c | 5 +++++
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>>>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>>> index 0c560e84ad5a53bb4e8a49ba4e153ce9cf33f7ae..e2261f50aabc6a2f931d810f3637dfdba5695f43 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_catalog.c
>>>>> @@ -1412,6 +1412,11 @@ static const struct adreno_info a7xx_gpus[] = {
>>>>> .gmu_cgc_mode = 0x00020202,
>>>>> },
>>>>> .address_space_size = SZ_256G,
>>>>> + .speedbins = ADRENO_SPEEDBINS(
>>>>> + { 0, 0 },
>>>>> + { 263, 1 },
>>>>> + { 315, 0 },
>>>>> + ),
>>>>> .preempt_record_size = 4192 * SZ_1K,
>>>>> }, {
>>>>> .chip_ids = ADRENO_CHIP_IDS(0x43051401), /* "C520v2" */
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>>> index 75f5367e73caace4648491b041f80b7c4d26bf89..7b31379eff444cf3f8ed0dcfd23c14920c13ee9d 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
>>>>> @@ -1078,7 +1078,20 @@ void adreno_gpu_ocmem_cleanup(struct adreno_ocmem *adreno_ocmem)
>>>>>
>>>>> int adreno_read_speedbin(struct device *dev, u32 *speedbin)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - return nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
>>>>> + u32 hi_bits = 0;
>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin", speedbin);
>>>>> + if (ret)
>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + /* Some chipsets have MSB bits (BIT(8) and above) at a non-contiguous location */
>>>>> + ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "speed_bin_hi", &hi_bits);
>>>>> + if (ret != -ENOENT)
>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + *speedbin |= (hi_bits << 8);
>>>>
>>>> Now that we're overwriting speedbin, we should probably have some checks in
>>>> order to make sure somebody passing a too-wide cell to one of these won't
>>>> result in cripplingly-untraceable value corruption
>>>>
>>>> I guess we could just introduce nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u8() and call it
>>>> a day?
>>>
>>> X1E is an outlier here, because this was fixed from the next chipset
>>> onward. For newer chipsets, we can use just the "speed_bin" node, which
>>> represents a contiguous 9 bits. So, just do a "WARN_ON(fls(speedbin) >
>>> 8)" here?
>>
>> Or extend nvmem core to support non-contiguous fields.
>
> This sounds more desirable, as we surely aren't the only ones with
> such a "feature"..
Sounds good. I can explore that when I am back from vacation early next
month.
-Akhil.
>
> Konrad
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.