Restructure srbds to use select/apply functions to create consistent
vulnerability handling.

Define new AUTO mitigation for SRBDS.

Signed-off-by: David Kaplan <david.kaplan@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
index 6c6a42b2dfe9..fedd693b2218 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ static void __init rfds_select_mitigation(void);
 static void __init rfds_update_mitigation(void);
 static void __init rfds_apply_mitigation(void);
 static void __init srbds_select_mitigation(void);
+static void __init srbds_apply_mitigation(void);
 static void __init l1d_flush_select_mitigation(void);
 static void __init srso_select_mitigation(void);
 static void __init gds_select_mitigation(void);
@@ -218,6 +219,7 @@ void __init cpu_select_mitigations(void)
 	taa_apply_mitigation();
 	mmio_apply_mitigation();
 	rfds_apply_mitigation();
+	srbds_apply_mitigation();
 }
 
 /*
@@ -673,6 +675,7 @@ early_param("reg_file_data_sampling", rfds_parse_cmdline);
 
 enum srbds_mitigations {
 	SRBDS_MITIGATION_OFF,
+	SRBDS_MITIGATION_AUTO,
 	SRBDS_MITIGATION_UCODE_NEEDED,
 	SRBDS_MITIGATION_FULL,
 	SRBDS_MITIGATION_TSX_OFF,
@@ -680,7 +683,7 @@ enum srbds_mitigations {
 };
 
 static enum srbds_mitigations srbds_mitigation __ro_after_init =
-	IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MITIGATION_SRBDS) ? SRBDS_MITIGATION_FULL : SRBDS_MITIGATION_OFF;
+	IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MITIGATION_SRBDS) ? SRBDS_MITIGATION_AUTO : SRBDS_MITIGATION_OFF;
 
 static const char * const srbds_strings[] = {
 	[SRBDS_MITIGATION_OFF]		= "Vulnerable",
@@ -734,6 +737,9 @@ static void __init srbds_select_mitigation(void)
 	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRBDS))
 		return;
 
+	if (srbds_mitigation == SRBDS_MITIGATION_AUTO)
+		srbds_mitigation = SRBDS_MITIGATION_FULL;
+
 	/*
 	 * Check to see if this is one of the MDS_NO systems supporting TSX that
 	 * are only exposed to SRBDS when TSX is enabled or when CPU is affected
@@ -748,6 +754,12 @@ static void __init srbds_select_mitigation(void)
 		srbds_mitigation = SRBDS_MITIGATION_UCODE_NEEDED;
 	else if (cpu_mitigations_off() || srbds_off)
 		srbds_mitigation = SRBDS_MITIGATION_OFF;
+}
+
+static void __init srbds_apply_mitigation(void)
+{
+	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRBDS))
+		return;
 
 	update_srbds_msr();
 	pr_info("%s\n", srbds_strings[srbds_mitigation]);
-- 
2.34.1

On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 02:24:49PM -0600, David Kaplan wrote:
> +static void __init srbds_apply_mitigation(void)
> +{
> +	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SRBDS))
> +		return;

I realize this is just preserving the existing behavior, but for
consistency with the others this should check for cpu_mitigations_off()
so the mitigation doesn't get printed.

>  	update_srbds_msr();
>  	pr_info("%s\n", srbds_strings[srbds_mitigation]);

More generally, IMO these should be printed in the select (or update)
functions rather than in the apply functions.

-- 
Josh