Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c

between commit:

  54d394905c92 ("iio: adc: ti-ads1119: fix sample size in scan struct for triggered buffer")

from the char-misc.current tree and commit:

  2cfb4cd058d0 ("iio: adc: Use aligned_s64 instead of open coding alignment.")

from the iio tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
index c268e27eec12,0a68ecdea4e6..000000000000
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
@@@ -500,8 -500,8 +500,8 @@@ static irqreturn_t ads1119_trigger_hand
  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
  	struct ads1119_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
  	struct {
 -		unsigned int sample;
 +		s16 sample;
- 		s64 timestamp __aligned(8);
+ 		aligned_s64 timestamp;
  	} scan;
  	unsigned int index;
  	int ret;

Hi all,

On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 15:21:07 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   54d394905c92 ("iio: adc: ti-ads1119: fix sample size in scan struct for triggered buffer")
> 
> from the char-misc.current tree and commit:
> 
>   2cfb4cd058d0 ("iio: adc: Use aligned_s64 instead of open coding alignment.")
> 
> from the iio tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
> index c268e27eec12,0a68ecdea4e6..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
> @@@ -500,8 -500,8 +500,8 @@@ static irqreturn_t ads1119_trigger_hand
>   	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
>   	struct ads1119_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>   	struct {
>  -		unsigned int sample;
>  +		s16 sample;
> - 		s64 timestamp __aligned(8);
> + 		aligned_s64 timestamp;
>   	} scan;
>   	unsigned int index;
>   	int ret;

This is now a conflict between the char-misc tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 02:23:42PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 15:21:07 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   54d394905c92 ("iio: adc: ti-ads1119: fix sample size in scan struct for triggered buffer")
> > 
> > from the char-misc.current tree and commit:
> > 
> >   2cfb4cd058d0 ("iio: adc: Use aligned_s64 instead of open coding alignment.")
> > 
> > from the iio tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell
> > 
> > diff --cc drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
> > index c268e27eec12,0a68ecdea4e6..000000000000
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1119.c
> > @@@ -500,8 -500,8 +500,8 @@@ static irqreturn_t ads1119_trigger_hand
> >   	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = pf->indio_dev;
> >   	struct ads1119_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >   	struct {
> >  -		unsigned int sample;
> >  +		s16 sample;
> > - 		s64 timestamp __aligned(8);
> > + 		aligned_s64 timestamp;
> >   	} scan;
> >   	unsigned int index;
> >   	int ret;
> 
> This is now a conflict between the char-misc tree and Linus' tree.
> 

Thanks, now resolved in my tree.

greg k-h