From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

i.MX95 features a System Controller and SCMI Spec 3.2 compatible
firmware System Manager(SM) runs on the controller.
Add "fsl,imx-sm" compatible string as fallback for "fsl,imx95" to
indicate it is compatible with i.MX System Manager.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
index 3713175548637ec17561c068932123c558776435..4f4def9ccdd6211461238d90bc0d1a85fd77a440 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
@@ -1354,6 +1354,7 @@ properties:
           - enum:
               - fsl,imx95-19x19-evk       # i.MX95 19x19 EVK Board
           - const: fsl,imx95
+          - const: fsl,imx-sm
 
       - description: i.MXRT1050 based Boards
         items:

-- 
2.37.1

On 04/01/2025 13:13, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> i.MX95 features a System Controller and SCMI Spec 3.2 compatible
> firmware System Manager(SM) runs on the controller.
> Add "fsl,imx-sm" compatible string as fallback for "fsl,imx95" to
> indicate it is compatible with i.MX System Manager.

I see little value in generic compatible like that. All these are
aarch64 so why not adding that compatible?

How this generic compatible would be used?

And by what exactly?

All this must be explained in the commit msg.

Best regards,
Krzysztof