no idea if this does anything useful; not needed for boot
Signed-off-by: E Shattow <e@freeshell.de>
---
arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
index 0d8339357bad..0bc922b3ae8a 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
+++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
@@ -344,6 +344,15 @@ tdm_ext: tdm-ext-clock {
#clock-cells = <0>;
};
+ timer {
+ compatible = "riscv, timer";
+ interrupts-extended = <&cpu0_intc 5>,
+ <&cpu1_intc 5>,
+ <&cpu2_intc 5>,
+ <&cpu3_intc 5>,
+ <&cpu4_intc 5>;
+ };
+
soc {
compatible = "simple-bus";
interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
--
2.45.2
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 12:41:21PM -0800, E Shattow wrote:
> no idea if this does anything useful; not needed for boot
>
> Signed-off-by: E Shattow <e@freeshell.de>
> ---
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> index 0d8339357bad..0bc922b3ae8a 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> @@ -344,6 +344,15 @@ tdm_ext: tdm-ext-clock {
> #clock-cells = <0>;
> };
>
> + timer {
> + compatible = "riscv, timer";
compatible has an extra space, so won't do anything!
> + interrupts-extended = <&cpu0_intc 5>,
> + <&cpu1_intc 5>,
> + <&cpu2_intc 5>,
> + <&cpu3_intc 5>,
> + <&cpu4_intc 5>;
> + };
> +
> soc {
> compatible = "simple-bus";
> interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
> --
> 2.45.2
>
On 1/13/25 10:39, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 12:41:21PM -0800, E Shattow wrote:
>> no idea if this does anything useful; not needed for boot
>>
>> Signed-off-by: E Shattow <e@freeshell.de>
>> ---
>> arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>> index 0d8339357bad..0bc922b3ae8a 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
>> @@ -344,6 +344,15 @@ tdm_ext: tdm-ext-clock {
>> #clock-cells = <0>;
>> };
>>
>> + timer {
>> + compatible = "riscv, timer";
>
> compatible has an extra space, so won't do anything!
>
>> + interrupts-extended = <&cpu0_intc 5>,
>> + <&cpu1_intc 5>,
>> + <&cpu2_intc 5>,
>> + <&cpu3_intc 5>,
>> + <&cpu4_intc 5>;
>> + };
>> +
>> soc {
>> compatible = "simple-bus";
>> interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
>> --
>> 2.45.2
>>
That extra space is my error and does not exist in U-Boot. Good catch!
So, when corrected it appears to boot either way with or without and not
any change in functionality that I can discern. My priority then for
this series is to drop this patch as something unnecessary.
Thanks, Conor!
-E
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 03:19:33AM -0800, E Shattow wrote:
>
> On 1/13/25 10:39, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 12:41:21PM -0800, E Shattow wrote:
> > > no idea if this does anything useful; not needed for boot
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: E Shattow <e@freeshell.de>
> > > ---
> > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi | 9 +++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> > > index 0d8339357bad..0bc922b3ae8a 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110.dtsi
> > > @@ -344,6 +344,15 @@ tdm_ext: tdm-ext-clock {
> > > #clock-cells = <0>;
> > > };
> > > + timer {
> > > + compatible = "riscv, timer";
> >
> > compatible has an extra space, so won't do anything!
> >
> > > + interrupts-extended = <&cpu0_intc 5>,
> > > + <&cpu1_intc 5>,
> > > + <&cpu2_intc 5>,
> > > + <&cpu3_intc 5>,
> > > + <&cpu4_intc 5>;
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > soc {
> > > compatible = "simple-bus";
> > > interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
> > > --
> > > 2.45.2
> > >
>
> That extra space is my error and does not exist in U-Boot. Good catch! So,
> when corrected it appears to boot either way with or without and not any
> change in functionality that I can discern. My priority then for this series
> is to drop this patch as something unnecessary.
I don't mind having it, if it makes the hw description more complete,
even if not used.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.