[PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add BigTreeTech CB2 and Pi2

Ivan Sergeev posted 2 patches 1 year, 1 month ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add BigTreeTech CB2 and Pi2
Posted by Ivan Sergeev 1 year, 1 month ago
BigTreeTech CB2 and Pi2 are Rockchip RK3566 based boards

Signed-off-by: Ivan Sergeev <ivan8215145640@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
index 753199a12923fadaa48c407a8e55e7854db7203e..349453b1676bfac45abf5cd49d6bd9f847281213 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
@@ -81,6 +81,17 @@ properties:
           - const: azw,beelink-a1
           - const: rockchip,rk3328
 
+      - description: BigTreeTech CB2 Manta M4/8P
+        items:
+          - const: bigtreetech,cb2-manta
+          - const: bigtreetech,cb2
+          - const: rockchip,rk3566
+
+      - description: BigTreeTech Pi 2
+        items:
+          - const: bigtreetech,pi2
+          - const: rockchip,rk3566
+
       - description: bq Curie 2 tablet
         items:
           - const: mundoreader,bq-curie2

-- 
2.45.2
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add BigTreeTech CB2 and Pi2
Posted by Krzysztof Kozlowski 1 year, 1 month ago
On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 06:10:13AM +0300, Ivan Sergeev wrote:
> BigTreeTech CB2 and Pi2 are Rockchip RK3566 based boards
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Sergeev <ivan8215145640@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

---

<form letter>
This is an automated instruction, just in case, because many review tags
are being ignored. If you know the process, you can skip it (please do
not feel offended by me posting it here - no bad intentions intended).
If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:

Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof