[PATCH] drm/panel: xinpeng-xpp055c272: transition to mipi_dsi wrapped functions

Tejas Vipin posted 1 patch 1 year ago
There is a newer version of this series
.../gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c  | 185 ++++++++----------
1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
[PATCH] drm/panel: xinpeng-xpp055c272: transition to mipi_dsi wrapped functions
Posted by Tejas Vipin 1 year ago
Changes the xinpeng-xpp055c272 panel to use multi style functions for
improved error handling.

Signed-off-by: Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76@gmail.com>
---
 .../gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c  | 185 ++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c
index 22a14006765e..45a405669593 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c
@@ -59,90 +59,82 @@ static inline struct xpp055c272 *panel_to_xpp055c272(struct drm_panel *panel)
 	return container_of(panel, struct xpp055c272, panel);
 }
 
-static int xpp055c272_init_sequence(struct xpp055c272 *ctx)
+static void xpp055c272_init_sequence(struct mipi_dsi_multi_context *dsi_ctx)
 {
-	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
-	struct device *dev = ctx->dev;
-
 	/*
 	 * Init sequence was supplied by the panel vendor without much
 	 * documentation.
 	 */
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETEXTC, 0xf1, 0x12, 0x83);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETMIPI,
-			       0x33, 0x81, 0x05, 0xf9, 0x0e, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x00,
-			       0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x44, 0x25,
-			       0x00, 0x91, 0x0a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x4f, 0x01,
-			       0x00, 0x00, 0x37);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPOWER_EXT, 0x25);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPCR, 0x02, 0x11, 0x00);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETRGBIF,
-			       0x0c, 0x10, 0x0a, 0x50, 0x03, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00,
-			       0x00, 0x00);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETSCR,
-			       0x73, 0x73, 0x50, 0x50, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x70,
-			       0x00);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETVDC, 0x46);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPANEL, 0x0b);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETCYC, 0x80);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETDISP, 0xc8, 0x12, 0x30);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETEQ,
-			       0x07, 0x07, 0x0B, 0x0B, 0x03, 0x0B, 0x00, 0x00,
-			       0x00, 0x00, 0xFF, 0x00, 0xC0, 0x10);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPOWER,
-			       0x53, 0x00, 0x1e, 0x1e, 0x77, 0xe1, 0xcc, 0xdd,
-			       0x67, 0x77, 0x33, 0x33);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETECO, 0x00, 0x00, 0xff,
-			       0xff, 0x01, 0xff);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETBGP, 0x09, 0x09);
-	msleep(20);
-
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETVCOM, 0x87, 0x95);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETGIP1,
-			       0xc2, 0x10, 0x05, 0x05, 0x10, 0x05, 0xa0, 0x12,
-			       0x31, 0x23, 0x3f, 0x81, 0x0a, 0xa0, 0x37, 0x18,
-			       0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80,
-			       0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x48, 0xf8, 0x86, 0x42,
-			       0x08, 0x88, 0x88, 0x80, 0x88, 0x88, 0x88, 0x58,
-			       0xf8, 0x87, 0x53, 0x18, 0x88, 0x88, 0x81, 0x88,
-			       0x88, 0x88, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00,
-			       0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETGIP2,
-			       0x00, 0x1a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x00,
-			       0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x1f, 0x88, 0x81, 0x35,
-			       0x78, 0x88, 0x88, 0x85, 0x88, 0x88, 0x88, 0x0f,
-			       0x88, 0x80, 0x24, 0x68, 0x88, 0x88, 0x84, 0x88,
-			       0x88, 0x88, 0x23, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x1c, 0x00,
-			       0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
-			       0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x30, 0x05,
-			       0xa0, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00);
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETGAMMA,
-			       0x00, 0x06, 0x08, 0x2a, 0x31, 0x3f, 0x38, 0x36,
-			       0x07, 0x0c, 0x0d, 0x11, 0x13, 0x12, 0x13, 0x11,
-			       0x18, 0x00, 0x06, 0x08, 0x2a, 0x31, 0x3f, 0x38,
-			       0x36, 0x07, 0x0c, 0x0d, 0x11, 0x13, 0x12, 0x13,
-			       0x11, 0x18);
-
-	msleep(60);
-
-	dev_dbg(dev, "Panel init sequence done\n");
-	return 0;
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETEXTC, 0xf1, 0x12, 0x83);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETMIPI,
+				     0x33, 0x81, 0x05, 0xf9, 0x0e, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x00,
+				     0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x44, 0x25,
+				     0x00, 0x91, 0x0a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x4f, 0x01,
+				     0x00, 0x00, 0x37);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPOWER_EXT, 0x25);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPCR, 0x02, 0x11, 0x00);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETRGBIF,
+				     0x0c, 0x10, 0x0a, 0x50, 0x03, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00,
+				     0x00, 0x00);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETSCR,
+				     0x73, 0x73, 0x50, 0x50, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x70,
+				     0x00);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETVDC, 0x46);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPANEL, 0x0b);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETCYC, 0x80);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETDISP, 0xc8, 0x12, 0x30);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETEQ,
+				     0x07, 0x07, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x03, 0x0b, 0x00, 0x00,
+				     0x00, 0x00, 0xff, 0x00, 0xC0, 0x10);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPOWER,
+				     0x53, 0x00, 0x1e, 0x1e, 0x77, 0xe1, 0xcc, 0xdd,
+				     0x67, 0x77, 0x33, 0x33);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETECO, 0x00, 0x00, 0xff,
+				     0xff, 0x01, 0xff);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETBGP, 0x09, 0x09);
+	mipi_dsi_msleep(dsi_ctx, 20);
+
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETVCOM, 0x87, 0x95);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETGIP1,
+				     0xc2, 0x10, 0x05, 0x05, 0x10, 0x05, 0xa0, 0x12,
+				     0x31, 0x23, 0x3f, 0x81, 0x0a, 0xa0, 0x37, 0x18,
+				     0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80,
+				     0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x48, 0xf8, 0x86, 0x42,
+				     0x08, 0x88, 0x88, 0x80, 0x88, 0x88, 0x88, 0x58,
+				     0xf8, 0x87, 0x53, 0x18, 0x88, 0x88, 0x81, 0x88,
+				     0x88, 0x88, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00,
+				     0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETGIP2,
+				     0x00, 0x1a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x00,
+				     0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x1f, 0x88, 0x81, 0x35,
+				     0x78, 0x88, 0x88, 0x85, 0x88, 0x88, 0x88, 0x0f,
+				     0x88, 0x80, 0x24, 0x68, 0x88, 0x88, 0x84, 0x88,
+				     0x88, 0x88, 0x23, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x1c, 0x00,
+				     0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
+				     0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x30, 0x05,
+				     0xa0, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETGAMMA,
+				     0x00, 0x06, 0x08, 0x2a, 0x31, 0x3f, 0x38, 0x36,
+				     0x07, 0x0c, 0x0d, 0x11, 0x13, 0x12, 0x13, 0x11,
+				     0x18, 0x00, 0x06, 0x08, 0x2a, 0x31, 0x3f, 0x38,
+				     0x36, 0x07, 0x0c, 0x0d, 0x11, 0x13, 0x12, 0x13,
+				     0x11, 0x18);
+
+	mipi_dsi_msleep(dsi_ctx, 60);
 }
 
 static int xpp055c272_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 {
 	struct xpp055c272 *ctx = panel_to_xpp055c272(panel);
 	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off(dsi);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to set display off: %d\n", ret);
-
-	mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode(dsi);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to enter sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
-		return ret;
+	struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
+
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off_multi(&dsi_ctx);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode_multi(&dsi_ctx);
+	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err) {
+		dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to enter sleep mode: %d\n",
+			dsi_ctx.accum_err);
+		return dsi_ctx.accum_err;
 	}
 
 	regulator_disable(ctx->iovcc);
@@ -155,17 +147,19 @@ static int xpp055c272_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 {
 	struct xpp055c272 *ctx = panel_to_xpp055c272(panel);
 	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
-	int ret;
+	struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
 
 	dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Resetting the panel\n");
-	ret = regulator_enable(ctx->vci);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable vci supply: %d\n", ret);
-		return ret;
+	dsi_ctx.accum_err = regulator_enable(ctx->vci);
+	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err) {
+		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable vci supply: %d\n",
+			dsi_ctx.accum_err);
+		return dsi_ctx.accum_err;
 	}
-	ret = regulator_enable(ctx->iovcc);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable iovcc supply: %d\n", ret);
+	dsi_ctx.accum_err = regulator_enable(ctx->iovcc);
+	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err) {
+		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable iovcc supply: %d\n",
+			dsi_ctx.accum_err);
 		goto disable_vci;
 	}
 
@@ -175,30 +169,19 @@ static int xpp055c272_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 0);
 
 	/* T8: 20ms */
-	msleep(20);
+	mipi_dsi_msleep(&dsi_ctx, 20);
 
-	ret = xpp055c272_init_sequence(ctx);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence failed: %d\n", ret);
-		goto disable_iovcc;
-	}
-
-	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode(dsi);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to exit sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
-		goto disable_iovcc;
-	}
+	xpp055c272_init_sequence(&dsi_ctx);
+	dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence done\n");
 
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode_multi(&dsi_ctx);
 	/* T9: 120ms */
-	msleep(120);
+	mipi_dsi_msleep(&dsi_ctx, 120);
+	mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on_multi(&dsi_ctx);
+	mipi_dsi_msleep(&dsi_ctx, 50);
 
-	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on(dsi);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to set display on: %d\n", ret);
+	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err)
 		goto disable_iovcc;
-	}
-
-	msleep(50);
 
 	return 0;
 
@@ -206,7 +189,7 @@ static int xpp055c272_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
 	regulator_disable(ctx->iovcc);
 disable_vci:
 	regulator_disable(ctx->vci);
-	return ret;
+	return dsi_ctx.accum_err;
 }
 
 static const struct drm_display_mode default_mode = {
-- 
2.47.1
Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: xinpeng-xpp055c272: transition to mipi_dsi wrapped functions
Posted by neil.armstrong@linaro.org 11 months, 3 weeks ago
On 23/12/2024 06:20, Tejas Vipin wrote:
> Changes the xinpeng-xpp055c272 panel to use multi style functions for
> improved error handling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76@gmail.com>
> ---
>   .../gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c  | 185 ++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c
> index 22a14006765e..45a405669593 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-xinpeng-xpp055c272.c
> @@ -59,90 +59,82 @@ static inline struct xpp055c272 *panel_to_xpp055c272(struct drm_panel *panel)
>   	return container_of(panel, struct xpp055c272, panel);
>   }
>   
> -static int xpp055c272_init_sequence(struct xpp055c272 *ctx)
> +static void xpp055c272_init_sequence(struct mipi_dsi_multi_context *dsi_ctx)
>   {
> -	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
> -	struct device *dev = ctx->dev;
> -
>   	/*
>   	 * Init sequence was supplied by the panel vendor without much
>   	 * documentation.
>   	 */
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETEXTC, 0xf1, 0x12, 0x83);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETMIPI,
> -			       0x33, 0x81, 0x05, 0xf9, 0x0e, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x00,
> -			       0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x44, 0x25,
> -			       0x00, 0x91, 0x0a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x4f, 0x01,
> -			       0x00, 0x00, 0x37);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPOWER_EXT, 0x25);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPCR, 0x02, 0x11, 0x00);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETRGBIF,
> -			       0x0c, 0x10, 0x0a, 0x50, 0x03, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00,
> -			       0x00, 0x00);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETSCR,
> -			       0x73, 0x73, 0x50, 0x50, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x70,
> -			       0x00);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETVDC, 0x46);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPANEL, 0x0b);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETCYC, 0x80);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETDISP, 0xc8, 0x12, 0x30);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETEQ,
> -			       0x07, 0x07, 0x0B, 0x0B, 0x03, 0x0B, 0x00, 0x00,
> -			       0x00, 0x00, 0xFF, 0x00, 0xC0, 0x10);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPOWER,
> -			       0x53, 0x00, 0x1e, 0x1e, 0x77, 0xe1, 0xcc, 0xdd,
> -			       0x67, 0x77, 0x33, 0x33);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETECO, 0x00, 0x00, 0xff,
> -			       0xff, 0x01, 0xff);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETBGP, 0x09, 0x09);
> -	msleep(20);
> -
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETVCOM, 0x87, 0x95);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETGIP1,
> -			       0xc2, 0x10, 0x05, 0x05, 0x10, 0x05, 0xa0, 0x12,
> -			       0x31, 0x23, 0x3f, 0x81, 0x0a, 0xa0, 0x37, 0x18,
> -			       0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80,
> -			       0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x48, 0xf8, 0x86, 0x42,
> -			       0x08, 0x88, 0x88, 0x80, 0x88, 0x88, 0x88, 0x58,
> -			       0xf8, 0x87, 0x53, 0x18, 0x88, 0x88, 0x81, 0x88,
> -			       0x88, 0x88, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00,
> -			       0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETGIP2,
> -			       0x00, 0x1a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x00,
> -			       0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x1f, 0x88, 0x81, 0x35,
> -			       0x78, 0x88, 0x88, 0x85, 0x88, 0x88, 0x88, 0x0f,
> -			       0x88, 0x80, 0x24, 0x68, 0x88, 0x88, 0x84, 0x88,
> -			       0x88, 0x88, 0x23, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x1c, 0x00,
> -			       0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
> -			       0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x30, 0x05,
> -			       0xa0, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00);
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq(dsi, XPP055C272_CMD_SETGAMMA,
> -			       0x00, 0x06, 0x08, 0x2a, 0x31, 0x3f, 0x38, 0x36,
> -			       0x07, 0x0c, 0x0d, 0x11, 0x13, 0x12, 0x13, 0x11,
> -			       0x18, 0x00, 0x06, 0x08, 0x2a, 0x31, 0x3f, 0x38,
> -			       0x36, 0x07, 0x0c, 0x0d, 0x11, 0x13, 0x12, 0x13,
> -			       0x11, 0x18);
> -
> -	msleep(60);
> -
> -	dev_dbg(dev, "Panel init sequence done\n");
> -	return 0;
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETEXTC, 0xf1, 0x12, 0x83);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETMIPI,
> +				     0x33, 0x81, 0x05, 0xf9, 0x0e, 0x0e, 0x00, 0x00,
> +				     0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x44, 0x25,
> +				     0x00, 0x91, 0x0a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x4f, 0x01,
> +				     0x00, 0x00, 0x37);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPOWER_EXT, 0x25);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPCR, 0x02, 0x11, 0x00);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETRGBIF,
> +				     0x0c, 0x10, 0x0a, 0x50, 0x03, 0xff, 0x00, 0x00,
> +				     0x00, 0x00);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETSCR,
> +				     0x73, 0x73, 0x50, 0x50, 0x00, 0x00, 0x08, 0x70,
> +				     0x00);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETVDC, 0x46);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPANEL, 0x0b);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETCYC, 0x80);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETDISP, 0xc8, 0x12, 0x30);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETEQ,
> +				     0x07, 0x07, 0x0b, 0x0b, 0x03, 0x0b, 0x00, 0x00,
> +				     0x00, 0x00, 0xff, 0x00, 0xC0, 0x10);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETPOWER,
> +				     0x53, 0x00, 0x1e, 0x1e, 0x77, 0xe1, 0xcc, 0xdd,
> +				     0x67, 0x77, 0x33, 0x33);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETECO, 0x00, 0x00, 0xff,
> +				     0xff, 0x01, 0xff);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETBGP, 0x09, 0x09);
> +	mipi_dsi_msleep(dsi_ctx, 20);
> +
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETVCOM, 0x87, 0x95);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETGIP1,
> +				     0xc2, 0x10, 0x05, 0x05, 0x10, 0x05, 0xa0, 0x12,
> +				     0x31, 0x23, 0x3f, 0x81, 0x0a, 0xa0, 0x37, 0x18,
> +				     0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x80,
> +				     0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x48, 0xf8, 0x86, 0x42,
> +				     0x08, 0x88, 0x88, 0x80, 0x88, 0x88, 0x88, 0x58,
> +				     0xf8, 0x87, 0x53, 0x18, 0x88, 0x88, 0x81, 0x88,
> +				     0x88, 0x88, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00,
> +				     0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETGIP2,
> +				     0x00, 0x1a, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x02, 0x00,
> +				     0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x1f, 0x88, 0x81, 0x35,
> +				     0x78, 0x88, 0x88, 0x85, 0x88, 0x88, 0x88, 0x0f,
> +				     0x88, 0x80, 0x24, 0x68, 0x88, 0x88, 0x84, 0x88,
> +				     0x88, 0x88, 0x23, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00, 0x1c, 0x00,
> +				     0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
> +				     0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x30, 0x05,
> +				     0xa0, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(dsi_ctx, XPP055C272_CMD_SETGAMMA,
> +				     0x00, 0x06, 0x08, 0x2a, 0x31, 0x3f, 0x38, 0x36,
> +				     0x07, 0x0c, 0x0d, 0x11, 0x13, 0x12, 0x13, 0x11,
> +				     0x18, 0x00, 0x06, 0x08, 0x2a, 0x31, 0x3f, 0x38,
> +				     0x36, 0x07, 0x0c, 0x0d, 0x11, 0x13, 0x12, 0x13,
> +				     0x11, 0x18);
> +
> +	mipi_dsi_msleep(dsi_ctx, 60);
>   }
>   
>   static int xpp055c272_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>   {
>   	struct xpp055c272 *ctx = panel_to_xpp055c272(panel);
>   	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off(dsi);
> -	if (ret < 0)
> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to set display off: %d\n", ret);
> -
> -	mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode(dsi);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to enter sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> +	struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
> +
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off_multi(&dsi_ctx);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode_multi(&dsi_ctx);
> +	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err) {
> +		dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to enter sleep mode: %d\n",
> +			dsi_ctx.accum_err);
> +		return dsi_ctx.accum_err;
>   	}
>   
>   	regulator_disable(ctx->iovcc);
> @@ -155,17 +147,19 @@ static int xpp055c272_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>   {
>   	struct xpp055c272 *ctx = panel_to_xpp055c272(panel);
>   	struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
> -	int ret;
> +	struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
>   
>   	dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Resetting the panel\n");
> -	ret = regulator_enable(ctx->vci);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable vci supply: %d\n", ret);
> -		return ret;
> +	dsi_ctx.accum_err = regulator_enable(ctx->vci);
> +	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err) {

I would rather keep ret instead of abusing dsi_ctx.accum_err, but it's already like
that in other converted driver so I won't oppose it...

> +		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable vci supply: %d\n",
> +			dsi_ctx.accum_err);
> +		return dsi_ctx.accum_err;
>   	}
> -	ret = regulator_enable(ctx->iovcc);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable iovcc supply: %d\n", ret);
> +	dsi_ctx.accum_err = regulator_enable(ctx->iovcc);
> +	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err) {
> +		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable iovcc supply: %d\n",
> +			dsi_ctx.accum_err);
>   		goto disable_vci;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -175,30 +169,19 @@ static int xpp055c272_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>   	gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 0);
>   
>   	/* T8: 20ms */
> -	msleep(20);
> +	mipi_dsi_msleep(&dsi_ctx, 20);
>   
> -	ret = xpp055c272_init_sequence(ctx);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence failed: %d\n", ret);
> -		goto disable_iovcc;
> -	}
> -
> -	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode(dsi);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to exit sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
> -		goto disable_iovcc;
> -	}
> +	xpp055c272_init_sequence(&dsi_ctx);
> +	dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence done\n");
>   
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode_multi(&dsi_ctx);
>   	/* T9: 120ms */
> -	msleep(120);
> +	mipi_dsi_msleep(&dsi_ctx, 120);
> +	mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on_multi(&dsi_ctx);
> +	mipi_dsi_msleep(&dsi_ctx, 50);
>   
> -	ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_on(dsi);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to set display on: %d\n", ret);
> +	if (dsi_ctx.accum_err)
>   		goto disable_iovcc;
> -	}
> -
> -	msleep(50);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   
> @@ -206,7 +189,7 @@ static int xpp055c272_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>   	regulator_disable(ctx->iovcc);
>   disable_vci:
>   	regulator_disable(ctx->vci);
> -	return ret;
> +	return dsi_ctx.accum_err;
>   }
>   
>   static const struct drm_display_mode default_mode = {


Otherwise looks good


Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>

Neil
Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: xinpeng-xpp055c272: transition to mipi_dsi wrapped functions
Posted by Doug Anderson 11 months, 2 weeks ago
Hi,

On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 2:10 AM <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> >   static int xpp055c272_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
> >   {
> >       struct xpp055c272 *ctx = panel_to_xpp055c272(panel);
> >       struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
> > -     int ret;
> > -
> > -     ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off(dsi);
> > -     if (ret < 0)
> > -             dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to set display off: %d\n", ret);
> > -
> > -     mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode(dsi);
> > -     if (ret < 0) {
> > -             dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to enter sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
> > -             return ret;
> > +     struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
> > +
> > +     mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off_multi(&dsi_ctx);
> > +     mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode_multi(&dsi_ctx);
> > +     if (dsi_ctx.accum_err) {
> > +             dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to enter sleep mode: %d\n",
> > +                     dsi_ctx.accum_err);

You should delete the above error message, right?
mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode_multi() reports the error for you, I
think.


> > @@ -155,17 +147,19 @@ static int xpp055c272_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
> >   {
> >       struct xpp055c272 *ctx = panel_to_xpp055c272(panel);
> >       struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
> > -     int ret;
> > +     struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
> >
> >       dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Resetting the panel\n");
> > -     ret = regulator_enable(ctx->vci);
> > -     if (ret < 0) {
> > -             dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable vci supply: %d\n", ret);
> > -             return ret;
> > +     dsi_ctx.accum_err = regulator_enable(ctx->vci);
> > +     if (dsi_ctx.accum_err) {
>
> I would rather keep ret instead of abusing dsi_ctx.accum_err, but it's already like
> that in other converted driver so I won't oppose it...

FWIW, we had this discussion before. I agree with what Tejas did here
and I managed to convince Dmitry Baryshkov in the past. See:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAA8EJpr_HYkXnP3XR9LpDhi1xkQfE_CKJzfzGrO5qd_pQYtiOw@mail.gmail.com/

Looking specifically at this driver, using "ret" would have added
complexity when we wanted to do "goto disable_vci" because in some
cases the error code would be in "ret" and sometimes in "accum_err"...


> > @@ -175,30 +169,19 @@ static int xpp055c272_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
> >       gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 0);
> >
> >       /* T8: 20ms */
> > -     msleep(20);
> > +     mipi_dsi_msleep(&dsi_ctx, 20);

Personally, I would have left the above msleep() alone. There can be
no errors at this point in the code, right?


> > -     ret = xpp055c272_init_sequence(ctx);
> > -     if (ret < 0) {
> > -             dev_err(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence failed: %d\n", ret);
> > -             goto disable_iovcc;
> > -     }
> > -
> > -     ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode(dsi);
> > -     if (ret < 0) {
> > -             dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to exit sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
> > -             goto disable_iovcc;
> > -     }
> > +     xpp055c272_init_sequence(&dsi_ctx);
> > +     dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence done\n");

Should the above print be only if "accum_err" is 0? That would match
the previous behavior. I guess I would have also left the print as
part of xpp055c272_init_sequence() unless there's a reason for moving
it...
Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: xinpeng-xpp055c272: transition to mipi_dsi wrapped functions
Posted by Tejas Vipin 11 months, 2 weeks ago

On 1/7/25 5:37 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 2:10 AM <neil.armstrong@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>>>   static int xpp055c272_unprepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>>>   {
>>>       struct xpp055c272 *ctx = panel_to_xpp055c272(panel);
>>>       struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
>>> -     int ret;
>>> -
>>> -     ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off(dsi);
>>> -     if (ret < 0)
>>> -             dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to set display off: %d\n", ret);
>>> -
>>> -     mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode(dsi);
>>> -     if (ret < 0) {
>>> -             dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to enter sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
>>> -             return ret;
>>> +     struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
>>> +
>>> +     mipi_dsi_dcs_set_display_off_multi(&dsi_ctx);
>>> +     mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode_multi(&dsi_ctx);
>>> +     if (dsi_ctx.accum_err) {
>>> +             dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to enter sleep mode: %d\n",
>>> +                     dsi_ctx.accum_err);
> 
> You should delete the above error message, right?
> mipi_dsi_dcs_enter_sleep_mode_multi() reports the error for you, I
> think.
> 
> 
>>> @@ -155,17 +147,19 @@ static int xpp055c272_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>>>   {
>>>       struct xpp055c272 *ctx = panel_to_xpp055c272(panel);
>>>       struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = to_mipi_dsi_device(ctx->dev);
>>> -     int ret;
>>> +     struct mipi_dsi_multi_context dsi_ctx = { .dsi = dsi };
>>>
>>>       dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Resetting the panel\n");
>>> -     ret = regulator_enable(ctx->vci);
>>> -     if (ret < 0) {
>>> -             dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to enable vci supply: %d\n", ret);
>>> -             return ret;
>>> +     dsi_ctx.accum_err = regulator_enable(ctx->vci);
>>> +     if (dsi_ctx.accum_err) {
>>
>> I would rather keep ret instead of abusing dsi_ctx.accum_err, but it's already like
>> that in other converted driver so I won't oppose it...
> 
> FWIW, we had this discussion before. I agree with what Tejas did here
> and I managed to convince Dmitry Baryshkov in the past. See:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAA8EJpr_HYkXnP3XR9LpDhi1xkQfE_CKJzfzGrO5qd_pQYtiOw@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Looking specifically at this driver, using "ret" would have added
> complexity when we wanted to do "goto disable_vci" because in some
> cases the error code would be in "ret" and sometimes in "accum_err"...
> 
> 
>>> @@ -175,30 +169,19 @@ static int xpp055c272_prepare(struct drm_panel *panel)
>>>       gpiod_set_value_cansleep(ctx->reset_gpio, 0);
>>>
>>>       /* T8: 20ms */
>>> -     msleep(20);
>>> +     mipi_dsi_msleep(&dsi_ctx, 20);
> 
> Personally, I would have left the above msleep() alone. There can be
> no errors at this point in the code, right?
> 
> 
>>> -     ret = xpp055c272_init_sequence(ctx);
>>> -     if (ret < 0) {
>>> -             dev_err(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence failed: %d\n", ret);
>>> -             goto disable_iovcc;
>>> -     }
>>> -
>>> -     ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode(dsi);
>>> -     if (ret < 0) {
>>> -             dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to exit sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
>>> -             goto disable_iovcc;
>>> -     }
>>> +     xpp055c272_init_sequence(&dsi_ctx);
>>> +     dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence done\n");
> 
> Should the above print be only if "accum_err" is 0? That would match
> the previous behavior. I guess I would have also left the print as
> part of xpp055c272_init_sequence() unless there's a reason for moving
> it...

I don't think it should print only if accum_err is 0. In the previous
code, it would just print after all the msleeps and write_seqs are done,
with no error checking at any point.
The reason I've moved the print outside the function is because we are
able to reduce a couple lines of code by passing dsi_ctx to the function
instead of ctx. If I'd kept the print inside, it would require us to
declare a `struct device*` variable which would require ctx as far as
I've seen and just overall introduces some lines that we could otherwise
avoid. I've done this in a couple other panels too.

I'll do a v2 with the other suggested changes.

-- 
Tejas Vipin
Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: xinpeng-xpp055c272: transition to mipi_dsi wrapped functions
Posted by Doug Anderson 11 months, 2 weeks ago
Hi,

On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 8:21 PM Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> -     ret = xpp055c272_init_sequence(ctx);
> >>> -     if (ret < 0) {
> >>> -             dev_err(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence failed: %d\n", ret);
> >>> -             goto disable_iovcc;
> >>> -     }
> >>> -
> >>> -     ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode(dsi);
> >>> -     if (ret < 0) {
> >>> -             dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to exit sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
> >>> -             goto disable_iovcc;
> >>> -     }
> >>> +     xpp055c272_init_sequence(&dsi_ctx);
> >>> +     dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence done\n");
> >
> > Should the above print be only if "accum_err" is 0? That would match
> > the previous behavior. I guess I would have also left the print as
> > part of xpp055c272_init_sequence() unless there's a reason for moving
> > it...
>
> I don't think it should print only if accum_err is 0. In the previous
> code, it would just print after all the msleeps and write_seqs are done,
> with no error checking at any point.

How sure are you about this? Remember the reason why we wanted to
deprecate mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq()? All those dang hidden return
values. So if any one of the old mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq() got an error
they would have had a non-obvious return out of the function, right?
So the print would have only happened if all of the commands executed
successfully...

:-P


> The reason I've moved the print outside the function is because we are
> able to reduce a couple lines of code by passing dsi_ctx to the function
> instead of ctx. If I'd kept the print inside, it would require us to
> declare a `struct device*` variable which would require ctx as far as
> I've seen and just overall introduces some lines that we could otherwise
> avoid. I've done this in a couple other panels too.

Ah, OK. That's a reasonable reason. Thanks for the explanation...


-Doug
Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: xinpeng-xpp055c272: transition to mipi_dsi wrapped functions
Posted by Tejas Vipin 11 months, 2 weeks ago

On 1/7/25 10:18 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 8:21 PM Tejas Vipin <tejasvipin76@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>> -     ret = xpp055c272_init_sequence(ctx);
>>>>> -     if (ret < 0) {
>>>>> -             dev_err(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence failed: %d\n", ret);
>>>>> -             goto disable_iovcc;
>>>>> -     }
>>>>> -
>>>>> -     ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_exit_sleep_mode(dsi);
>>>>> -     if (ret < 0) {
>>>>> -             dev_err(ctx->dev, "Failed to exit sleep mode: %d\n", ret);
>>>>> -             goto disable_iovcc;
>>>>> -     }
>>>>> +     xpp055c272_init_sequence(&dsi_ctx);
>>>>> +     dev_dbg(ctx->dev, "Panel init sequence done\n");
>>>
>>> Should the above print be only if "accum_err" is 0? That would match
>>> the previous behavior. I guess I would have also left the print as
>>> part of xpp055c272_init_sequence() unless there's a reason for moving
>>> it...
>>
>> I don't think it should print only if accum_err is 0. In the previous
>> code, it would just print after all the msleeps and write_seqs are done,
>> with no error checking at any point.
> 
> How sure are you about this? Remember the reason why we wanted to
> deprecate mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq()? All those dang hidden return
> values. So if any one of the old mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq() got an error
> they would have had a non-obvious return out of the function, right?
> So the print would have only happened if all of the commands executed
> successfully...
> 
> :-P

Right yes. I'd kind of forgotten how mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq worked. I'll
fix it then along with the rest of the changes.

> 
> 
>> The reason I've moved the print outside the function is because we are
>> able to reduce a couple lines of code by passing dsi_ctx to the function
>> instead of ctx. If I'd kept the print inside, it would require us to
>> declare a `struct device*` variable which would require ctx as far as
>> I've seen and just overall introduces some lines that we could otherwise
>> avoid. I've done this in a couple other panels too.
> 
> Ah, OK. That's a reasonable reason. Thanks for the explanation...
> 
> 
> -Doug

-- 
Tejas Vipin