X1P42100 is heavily based upon X1E80100, but ultimately it's a
separate design.

From the clocks POV, we need a new GPUCC driver (though for ease of DT
integration the bindings part is reused from X1E - perhaps that's
something to look into on a broader scale, but that's not for today).

GCC also has some tiny changes, enough to warrant a new compatible,
however none of them are big enough to require driver changes today.
Bindings are adjusted so that if/when such need arises, it'll be
easy to take care of.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
Konrad Dybcio (3):
      dt-bindings: clock: qcom,x1e80100-gcc: Add X1P42100
      dt-bindings: clock: qcom,x1e80100-gpucc: Extend for X1P42100
      clk: qcom: Add X1P42100 GPUCC driver

 .../bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-gpucc.yaml          |   1 +
 .../bindings/clock/qcom,x1e80100-gcc.yaml          |   6 +-
 drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig                           |   9 +
 drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile                          |   1 +
 drivers/clk/qcom/gpucc-x1p42100.c                  | 587 +++++++++++++++++++++
 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,x1e80100-gpucc.h    |  13 +
 6 files changed, 616 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
base-commit: 8155b4ef3466f0e289e8fcc9e6e62f3f4dceeac2
change-id: 20241221-topic-x1p4_clk-a4df74ebe815

Best regards,
-- 
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>

On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 13:24:08 +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> X1P42100 is heavily based upon X1E80100, but ultimately it's a
> separate design.
> 
> From the clocks POV, we need a new GPUCC driver (though for ease of DT
> integration the bindings part is reused from X1E - perhaps that's
> something to look into on a broader scale, but that's not for today).
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/3] dt-bindings: clock: qcom,x1e80100-gcc: Add X1P42100
      commit: 089c09ee12317def57ab6a5159269315743083e3
[3/3] clk: qcom: Add X1P42100 GPUCC driver
      commit: 99c21c7ca6423913783ea50e2c16be3cc097f17b

Best regards,
-- 
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>