From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>

Running "make savedefconfig" highlights that some flags are no more used,
remove them.
Remove some flags to reduce the kernel image size as STM32 MCU's board
embeds low amount of RAM.

Changes in V2:
  _ squash patches 2-7
  _ split patch 1 in three parts and add epxlanations about flags removal.

Patrice Chotard (4):
  ARM: configs: stm32: Remove FLASH_MEM_BASE and FLASH_SIZE in STM32
    defconfig
  ARM: configs: stm32: Clean STM32 defconfig
  ARM: configs: stm32: Remove CRYPTO in STM32 defconfig
  ARM: configs: stm32: Remove useless flags in STM32 defconfig

 arch/arm/configs/stm32_defconfig | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1

On Fri, Dec 20, 2024, at 13:55, patrice.chotard@foss.st.com wrote:
> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
>
> Running "make savedefconfig" highlights that some flags are no more used,
> remove them.
> Remove some flags to reduce the kernel image size as STM32 MCU's board
> embeds low amount of RAM.
>
> Changes in V2:
>   _ squash patches 2-7
>   _ split patch 1 in three parts and add epxlanations about flags removal.

Looks good to me, thanks for the update. I assume the plan is to
have this in another pull request rather than me picking up the
patches directly, right?


Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Hi Arnd

On 12/20/24 17:47, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2024, at 13:55, patrice.chotard@foss.st.com wrote:
>> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
>>
>> Running "make savedefconfig" highlights that some flags are no more used,
>> remove them.
>> Remove some flags to reduce the kernel image size as STM32 MCU's board
>> embeds low amount of RAM.
>>
>> Changes in V2:
>>    _ squash patches 2-7
>>    _ split patch 1 in three parts and add epxlanations about flags removal.
> 
> Looks good to me, thanks for the update. I assume the plan is to
> have this in another pull request rather than me picking up the
> patches directly, right?

I don't plan to send a second round so you can take it directly.

Thanks
Alex

> 
> 
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 05:47:01PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2024, at 13:55, patrice.chotard@foss.st.com wrote:
> > From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
> >
> > Running "make savedefconfig" highlights that some flags are no more used,
> > remove them.
> > Remove some flags to reduce the kernel image size as STM32 MCU's board
> > embeds low amount of RAM.
> >
> > Changes in V2:
> >   _ squash patches 2-7
> >   _ split patch 1 in three parts and add epxlanations about flags removal.
> 
> Looks good to me, thanks for the update. I assume the plan is to
> have this in another pull request rather than me picking up the
> patches directly, right?

On that note, I would *love* to no longer get patches into my inbox,
and I'll start to kindly request the senders of said patches to take
me off the recipients in the future. I'm not actively part of the soc
maintainer group any more, but I'm guessing that the others would benefit
from the same.

STM32 already has a maintainer, so there's no need to send these directly
to the soc-level maintainers, as far as I can tell. And certainly not
in the to: line (vs cc), at that.

If there's reason to send them directly, such as the platform maintainer
being unavailable or the patch being urgent as a fix, a justification
to make sure they're not missed would be useful.


-Olof