On Thu, Dec 19, 2024, at 18:29, patrice.chotard@foss.st.com wrote:
> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
>
> *** BLURB HERE ***
>
> Patrice Chotard (7):
> ARM: configs: stm32: run savedefconfig for STM32 defconfig
> ARM: configs: stm32: Disable CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_STM32MP in STM32
> defconfig
> ARM: configs: stm32: Disable CONFIG_SUSPEND in STM32 defconfig
> ARM: configs: stm32: Disable CONFIG_ADVISE_SYSCALLS in STM32 defconfig
I would structure these the other way round: you can combine patches
2-7 and just explain why you do those changes in one commit.
For the things that have changed by themselves, you do need a lot
more explanation, so we can see that you have checked that these
don't accidentally break stuff. You can probably still do them
in a single patch, but it would be nicer to have one patch
per option that has become unavailable, changing all defconfig
files that need the same change.
Arnd