spmi_controller_probe() increments the refcount of an OF node, but does
not release it. Instead, call of_node_get() in spmi_controller_alloc()
and release it in spmi_ctrl_release() to avoid the reference leak. Also
remove the lines in spmi_pmic_arb_bus_init() and spmi_controller_probe()
where a pdev's of_node is stored after spmi_controller_alloc() is
called, since the node is already set with an incremented refcount in
spmi_controller_alloc(). Those lines do not overwrite the of_node since
they set the same node that the spmi_controller_alloc() does, but are
confusing at the very least.

This bug was found by an experimental verification tool that I am
developing.

Fixes: e562cf3aea3e ("spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: move driver from staging")
Signed-off-by: Joe Hattori <joe@pf.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
---
Changes in v3:
- Utilize device_set_node().
- Update the commit message.

Changes in v2:
- Remove the store to of_node in spmi_pmic_arb_bus_init().
---
 drivers/spmi/hisi-spmi-controller.c | 1 -
 drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c        | 1 -
 drivers/spmi/spmi.c                 | 3 ++-
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spmi/hisi-spmi-controller.c b/drivers/spmi/hisi-spmi-controller.c
index 3cafdf22c909..dd21c5d1ca83 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/hisi-spmi-controller.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/hisi-spmi-controller.c
@@ -301,7 +301,6 @@ static int spmi_controller_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	spin_lock_init(&spmi_controller->lock);
 
 	ctrl->dev.parent = pdev->dev.parent;
-	ctrl->dev.of_node = of_node_get(pdev->dev.of_node);
 
 	/* Callbacks */
 	ctrl->read_cmd = spmi_read_cmd;
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
index 5c058db21821..73f2f19737f8 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
@@ -1746,7 +1746,6 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_bus_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(bus->irq,
 					 pmic_arb_chained_irq, bus);
 
-	ctrl->dev.of_node = node;
 	dev_set_name(&ctrl->dev, "spmi-%d", bus_index);
 
 	ret = devm_spmi_controller_add(dev, ctrl);
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
index fb0101da1485..9964ecb36116 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ static void spmi_ctrl_release(struct device *dev)
 	struct spmi_controller *ctrl = to_spmi_controller(dev);
 
 	ida_free(&ctrl_ida, ctrl->nr);
+	of_node_put(dev->of_node);
 	kfree(ctrl);
 }
 
@@ -458,7 +459,7 @@ struct spmi_controller *spmi_controller_alloc(struct device *parent,
 	ctrl->dev.type = &spmi_ctrl_type;
 	ctrl->dev.bus = &spmi_bus_type;
 	ctrl->dev.parent = parent;
-	ctrl->dev.of_node = parent->of_node;
+	device_set_node(&ctrl->dev, of_fwnode_handle(of_node_get(parent->of_node)));
 	spmi_controller_set_drvdata(ctrl, &ctrl[1]);
 
 	id = ida_alloc(&ctrl_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
-- 
2.34.1

Quoting Joe Hattori (2024-12-18 17:35:07)
> spmi_controller_probe() increments the refcount of an OF node, but does
> not release it. Instead, call of_node_get() in spmi_controller_alloc()
> and release it in spmi_ctrl_release() to avoid the reference leak. Also
> remove the lines in spmi_pmic_arb_bus_init() and spmi_controller_probe()
> where a pdev's of_node is stored after spmi_controller_alloc() is
> called, since the node is already set with an incremented refcount in
> spmi_controller_alloc(). Those lines do not overwrite the of_node since
> they set the same node that the spmi_controller_alloc() does, but are
> confusing at the very least.
> 
> This bug was found by an experimental verification tool that I am
> developing.
> 
> Fixes: e562cf3aea3e ("spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: move driver from staging")
> Signed-off-by: Joe Hattori <joe@pf.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
> ---

Applied to spmi-next