We recently updated these device_match*() (and therefore, various
*find_device_by*()) functions to return a consistent 'false' value when
trying to match a NULL handle. Add tests for this.
This provides regression-testing coverage for the sorts of bugs that
underly commit 5c8418cf4025 ("PCI/pwrctrl: Unregister platform device
only if one actually exists").
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
---
Changes in v3:
* Fix potential leak in test error case
* Add Maxime's Reviewed-by
Changes in v2:
* Keep "devm" and "match" tests in separate suites
drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c b/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c
index ea05b8785743..6355a2231b74 100644
--- a/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c
+++ b/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c
@@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <kunit/platform_device.h>
#include <kunit/resource.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/device/bus.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#define DEVICE_NAME "test"
@@ -217,7 +220,43 @@ static struct kunit_suite platform_device_devm_test_suite = {
.test_cases = platform_device_devm_tests,
};
-kunit_test_suite(platform_device_devm_test_suite);
+static void platform_device_find_by_null_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct platform_device *pdev;
+ int ret;
+
+ pdev = kunit_platform_device_alloc(test, DEVICE_NAME, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
+
+ ret = kunit_platform_device_add(test, pdev);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, of_find_device_by_node(NULL), NULL);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, bus_find_device_by_of_node(&platform_bus_type, NULL), NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, bus_find_device_by_fwnode(&platform_bus_type, NULL), NULL);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, bus_find_device_by_acpi_dev(&platform_bus_type, NULL), NULL);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_of_node(&pdev->dev, NULL));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_fwnode(&pdev->dev, NULL));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_acpi_dev(&pdev->dev, NULL));
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_acpi_handle(&pdev->dev, NULL));
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case platform_device_match_tests[] = {
+ KUNIT_CASE(platform_device_find_by_null_test),
+ {}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite platform_device_match_test_suite = {
+ .name = "platform-device-match",
+ .test_cases = platform_device_match_tests,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(
+ &platform_device_devm_test_suite,
+ &platform_device_match_test_suite,
+);
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test module for platform devices");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>");
--
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 04:12, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> We recently updated these device_match*() (and therefore, various
> *find_device_by*()) functions to return a consistent 'false' value when
> trying to match a NULL handle. Add tests for this.
>
> This provides regression-testing coverage for the sorts of bugs that
> underly commit 5c8418cf4025 ("PCI/pwrctrl: Unregister platform device
> only if one actually exists").
>
> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> ---
>
Thanks. This looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
-- David
> Changes in v3:
> * Fix potential leak in test error case
> * Add Maxime's Reviewed-by
>
> Changes in v2:
> * Keep "devm" and "match" tests in separate suites
>
> drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c b/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c
> index ea05b8785743..6355a2231b74 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/test/platform-device-test.c
> @@ -1,8 +1,11 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> +#include <kunit/platform_device.h>
> #include <kunit/resource.h>
>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/device/bus.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>
> #define DEVICE_NAME "test"
> @@ -217,7 +220,43 @@ static struct kunit_suite platform_device_devm_test_suite = {
> .test_cases = platform_device_devm_tests,
> };
>
> -kunit_test_suite(platform_device_devm_test_suite);
> +static void platform_device_find_by_null_test(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + pdev = kunit_platform_device_alloc(test, DEVICE_NAME, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
> +
> + ret = kunit_platform_device_add(test, pdev);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, of_find_device_by_node(NULL), NULL);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, bus_find_device_by_of_node(&platform_bus_type, NULL), NULL);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, bus_find_device_by_fwnode(&platform_bus_type, NULL), NULL);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, bus_find_device_by_acpi_dev(&platform_bus_type, NULL), NULL);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_of_node(&pdev->dev, NULL));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_fwnode(&pdev->dev, NULL));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_acpi_dev(&pdev->dev, NULL));
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, device_match_acpi_handle(&pdev->dev, NULL));
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case platform_device_match_tests[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(platform_device_find_by_null_test),
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite platform_device_match_test_suite = {
> + .name = "platform-device-match",
> + .test_cases = platform_device_match_tests,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suites(
> + &platform_device_devm_test_suite,
> + &platform_device_match_test_suite,
> +);
>
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test module for platform devices");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>");
> --
> 2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
>
On 12/18/24 22:45, David Gow wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 04:12, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> We recently updated these device_match*() (and therefore, various
>> *find_device_by*()) functions to return a consistent 'false' value when
>> trying to match a NULL handle. Add tests for this.
>>
>> This provides regression-testing coverage for the sorts of bugs that
>> underly commit 5c8418cf4025 ("PCI/pwrctrl: Unregister platform device
>> only if one actually exists").
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
>> ---
>>
>
> Thanks. This looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
>
>
>
This one also can go through Greg's drivers tree:
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.