of_find_device_by_node(), bus_find_device_by_of_node(),
bus_find_device_by_fwnode(), ..., all produce arbitrary results when
provided with a NULL of_node, fwnode, ACPI handle, etc. This is
counterintuitive, and the source of a few bugs, such as the one fixed by
commit 5c8418cf4025 ("PCI/pwrctrl: Unregister platform device only if
one actually exists").
It's hard to imagine a good reason that these device_match_*() APIs
should return 'true' for a NULL argument. Augment these to return 0
(false).
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
---
Changes in v3:
* Add Rafael's Acked-by
Changes in v2:
* Add Rob's Reviewed-by
drivers/base/core.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index 94865c9d8adc..2b7b13fc36d7 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -5246,13 +5246,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_match_name);
int device_match_of_node(struct device *dev, const void *np)
{
- return dev->of_node == np;
+ return np && dev->of_node == np;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_match_of_node);
int device_match_fwnode(struct device *dev, const void *fwnode)
{
- return dev_fwnode(dev) == fwnode;
+ return fwnode && dev_fwnode(dev) == fwnode;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_match_fwnode);
@@ -5264,13 +5264,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_match_devt);
int device_match_acpi_dev(struct device *dev, const void *adev)
{
- return ACPI_COMPANION(dev) == adev;
+ return adev && ACPI_COMPANION(dev) == adev;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(device_match_acpi_dev);
int device_match_acpi_handle(struct device *dev, const void *handle)
{
- return ACPI_HANDLE(dev) == handle;
+ return handle && ACPI_HANDLE(dev) == handle;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(device_match_acpi_handle);
--
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 04:12, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> of_find_device_by_node(), bus_find_device_by_of_node(),
> bus_find_device_by_fwnode(), ..., all produce arbitrary results when
> provided with a NULL of_node, fwnode, ACPI handle, etc. This is
> counterintuitive, and the source of a few bugs, such as the one fixed by
> commit 5c8418cf4025 ("PCI/pwrctrl: Unregister platform device only if
> one actually exists").
>
> It's hard to imagine a good reason that these device_match_*() APIs
> should return 'true' for a NULL argument. Augment these to return 0
> (false).
>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> ---
Seems sensible enough to me.
Acked-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
I assume this series (including the KUnit test changes) will go in via Greg.
Cheers,
-- David
>
> Changes in v3:
> * Add Rafael's Acked-by
>
> Changes in v2:
> * Add Rob's Reviewed-by
>
> drivers/base/core.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index 94865c9d8adc..2b7b13fc36d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -5246,13 +5246,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_match_name);
>
> int device_match_of_node(struct device *dev, const void *np)
> {
> - return dev->of_node == np;
> + return np && dev->of_node == np;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_match_of_node);
>
> int device_match_fwnode(struct device *dev, const void *fwnode)
> {
> - return dev_fwnode(dev) == fwnode;
> + return fwnode && dev_fwnode(dev) == fwnode;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_match_fwnode);
>
> @@ -5264,13 +5264,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_match_devt);
>
> int device_match_acpi_dev(struct device *dev, const void *adev)
> {
> - return ACPI_COMPANION(dev) == adev;
> + return adev && ACPI_COMPANION(dev) == adev;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(device_match_acpi_dev);
>
> int device_match_acpi_handle(struct device *dev, const void *handle)
> {
> - return ACPI_HANDLE(dev) == handle;
> + return handle && ACPI_HANDLE(dev) == handle;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(device_match_acpi_handle);
>
> --
> 2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
>
On 12/18/24 22:45, David Gow wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 04:12, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>> of_find_device_by_node(), bus_find_device_by_of_node(),
>> bus_find_device_by_fwnode(), ..., all produce arbitrary results when
>> provided with a NULL of_node, fwnode, ACPI handle, etc. This is
>> counterintuitive, and the source of a few bugs, such as the one fixed by
>> commit 5c8418cf4025 ("PCI/pwrctrl: Unregister platform device only if
>> one actually exists").
>>
>> It's hard to imagine a good reason that these device_match_*() APIs
>> should return 'true' for a NULL argument. Augment these to return 0
>> (false).
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
>> ---
>
> Seems sensible enough to me.
>
> Acked-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
>
> I assume this series (including the KUnit test changes) will go in via Greg.
>
Works for me.
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 10:33:51AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 12/18/24 22:45, David Gow wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 04:12, Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > of_find_device_by_node(), bus_find_device_by_of_node(),
> > > bus_find_device_by_fwnode(), ..., all produce arbitrary results when
> > > provided with a NULL of_node, fwnode, ACPI handle, etc. This is
> > > counterintuitive, and the source of a few bugs, such as the one fixed by
> > > commit 5c8418cf4025 ("PCI/pwrctrl: Unregister platform device only if
> > > one actually exists").
> > >
> > > It's hard to imagine a good reason that these device_match_*() APIs
> > > should return 'true' for a NULL argument. Augment these to return 0
> > > (false).
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> > > ---
> >
> > Seems sensible enough to me.
> >
> > Acked-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> >
> > I assume this series (including the KUnit test changes) will go in via Greg.
> >
>
> Works for me.
>
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Thanks, I'll take these in a few days.
greg k-h
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.