1. Patchew
  2. linux
  3. View series

[PATCH] bpf: do not inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with CONFIG_SMP disabled

Andrea Righi posted 1 patch 1 year ago 
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH] bpf: do not inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with CONFIG_SMP disabled
Posted by Andrea Righi 1 year ago 
Calling bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in a kernel with CONFIG_SMP disabled
can trigger the following bug, as pcpu_hot is unavailable:

[    8.471774] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000936a290c
[    8.471849] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[    8.471881] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page

Fix by preventing the inlining of bpf_get_smp_processor_id() when
CONFIG_SMP disabled.

Fixes: 1ae6921009e5 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper")
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index f7f892a52a37..d85413f1a784 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -21272,7 +21272,7 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 			goto next_insn;
 		}
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && !defined(CONFIG_UML)
+#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_X86_64) && !defined(CONFIG_UML)
 		/* Implement bpf_get_smp_processor_id() inline. */
 		if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_smp_processor_id &&
 		    verifier_inlines_helper_call(env, insn->imm)) {
-- 
2.47.1
Re: [PATCH] bpf: do not inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with CONFIG_SMP disabled
Posted by Daniel Borkmann 1 year ago 
On 12/16/24 11:46 AM, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Calling bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in a kernel with CONFIG_SMP disabled
> can trigger the following bug, as pcpu_hot is unavailable:
> 
> [    8.471774] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000936a290c
> [    8.471849] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [    8.471881] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> 
> Fix by preventing the inlining of bpf_get_smp_processor_id() when
> CONFIG_SMP disabled.
> 
> Fixes: 1ae6921009e5 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper")
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>

lgtm, but can't we instead do sth like this :

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index f7f892a52a37..761c70899754 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -21281,11 +21281,15 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
  			 * changed in some incompatible and hard to support
  			 * way, it's fine to back out this inlining logic
  			 */
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
  			insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, (u32)(unsigned long)&pcpu_hot.cpu_number);
  			insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
  			insn_buf[2] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
  			cnt = 3;
-
+#else
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0),
+			cnt = 1;
+#endif
  			new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
  			if (!new_prog)
  				return -ENOMEM;

Thanks,
Daniel
Re: [PATCH] bpf: do not inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with CONFIG_SMP disabled
Posted by Andrea Righi 1 year ago 
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 05:16:33PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 12/16/24 11:46 AM, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > Calling bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in a kernel with CONFIG_SMP disabled
> > can trigger the following bug, as pcpu_hot is unavailable:
> > 
> > [    8.471774] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000936a290c
> > [    8.471849] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> > [    8.471881] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> > 
> > Fix by preventing the inlining of bpf_get_smp_processor_id() when
> > CONFIG_SMP disabled.
> > 
> > Fixes: 1ae6921009e5 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper")
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
> 
> lgtm, but can't we instead do sth like this :
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index f7f892a52a37..761c70899754 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -21281,11 +21281,15 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
>  			 * changed in some incompatible and hard to support
>  			 * way, it's fine to back out this inlining logic
>  			 */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  			insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, (u32)(unsigned long)&pcpu_hot.cpu_number);
>  			insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
>  			insn_buf[2] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
>  			cnt = 3;
> -
> +#else
> +			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0),
> +			cnt = 1;
> +#endif
>  			new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
>  			if (!new_prog)
>  				return -ENOMEM;

That works as well (just tested) and it's probably better since we're
basically inlining the return 0. Do you want me to send a v2 with this?

Thanks,
-Andrea
Re: [PATCH] bpf: do not inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with CONFIG_SMP disabled
Posted by Daniel Borkmann 1 year ago 
On 12/16/24 6:24 PM, Andrea Righi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 05:16:33PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> On 12/16/24 11:46 AM, Andrea Righi wrote:
>>> Calling bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in a kernel with CONFIG_SMP disabled
>>> can trigger the following bug, as pcpu_hot is unavailable:
>>>
>>> [    8.471774] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000936a290c
>>> [    8.471849] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
>>> [    8.471881] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
>>>
>>> Fix by preventing the inlining of bpf_get_smp_processor_id() when
>>> CONFIG_SMP disabled.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 1ae6921009e5 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper")
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
>>
>> lgtm, but can't we instead do sth like this :
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> index f7f892a52a37..761c70899754 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>> @@ -21281,11 +21281,15 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
>>   			 * changed in some incompatible and hard to support
>>   			 * way, it's fine to back out this inlining logic
>>   			 */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>>   			insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, (u32)(unsigned long)&pcpu_hot.cpu_number);
>>   			insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
>>   			insn_buf[2] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
>>   			cnt = 3;
>> -
>> +#else
>> +			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0),
>> +			cnt = 1;
>> +#endif
>>   			new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
>>   			if (!new_prog)
>>   				return -ENOMEM;
> 
> That works as well (just tested) and it's probably better since we're
> basically inlining the return 0. Do you want me to send a v2 with this?

Yes, pls send v2, I think this is better than explicitly calling the
helper under !CONFIG_SMP.

Thanks,
Daniel
Re: [PATCH] bpf: do not inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with CONFIG_SMP disabled
Posted by Eduard Zingerman 1 year ago 
On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 18:24 +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 05:16:33PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > On 12/16/24 11:46 AM, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > > Calling bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in a kernel with CONFIG_SMP disabled
> > > can trigger the following bug, as pcpu_hot is unavailable:
> > > 
> > > [    8.471774] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000936a290c
> > > [    8.471849] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> > > [    8.471881] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> > > 
> > > Fix by preventing the inlining of bpf_get_smp_processor_id() when
> > > CONFIG_SMP disabled.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 1ae6921009e5 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper")
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
> > 
> > lgtm, but can't we instead do sth like this :
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > index f7f892a52a37..761c70899754 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > @@ -21281,11 +21281,15 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
> >  			 * changed in some incompatible and hard to support
> >  			 * way, it's fine to back out this inlining logic
> >  			 */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >  			insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, (u32)(unsigned long)&pcpu_hot.cpu_number);
> >  			insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
> >  			insn_buf[2] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
> >  			cnt = 3;
> > -
> > +#else
> > +			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0),
> > +			cnt = 1;
> > +#endif
> >  			new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
> >  			if (!new_prog)
> >  				return -ENOMEM;
> 
> That works as well (just tested) and it's probably better since we're
> basically inlining the return 0. Do you want me to send a v2 with this?

I think both Andrea's and Daniel's versions of the fix are good.
Note, however, that I missed one more configuration variable when
making bpf_get_smp_processor_id() inlinable: CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT.

Helper body:

    BPF_CALL_0(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
    {
    	return smp_processor_id();
    }

smp_processor_id definition:

    #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
      extern unsigned int debug_smp_processor_id(void);
    # define smp_processor_id() debug_smp_processor_id()
    #else
    # define smp_processor_id() __smp_processor_id()
    #endif

Thanks,
Eduard.
Re: [PATCH] bpf: do not inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with CONFIG_SMP disabled
Posted by Alexei Starovoitov 1 year ago 
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 10:27 AM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2024-12-16 at 18:24 +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 05:16:33PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > On 12/16/24 11:46 AM, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > > > Calling bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in a kernel with CONFIG_SMP disabled
> > > > can trigger the following bug, as pcpu_hot is unavailable:
> > > >
> > > > [    8.471774] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000936a290c
> > > > [    8.471849] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> > > > [    8.471881] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> > > >
> > > > Fix by preventing the inlining of bpf_get_smp_processor_id() when
> > > > CONFIG_SMP disabled.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 1ae6921009e5 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
> > >
> > > lgtm, but can't we instead do sth like this :
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > > index f7f892a52a37..761c70899754 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > > @@ -21281,11 +21281,15 @@ static int do_misc_fixups(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
> > >                      * changed in some incompatible and hard to support
> > >                      * way, it's fine to back out this inlining logic
> > >                      */
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > >                     insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, (u32)(unsigned long)&pcpu_hot.cpu_number);
> > >                     insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0);
> > >                     insn_buf[2] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0);
> > >                     cnt = 3;
> > > -
> > > +#else
> > > +                   BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0),
> > > +                   cnt = 1;
> > > +#endif
> > >                     new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt);
> > >                     if (!new_prog)
> > >                             return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > That works as well (just tested) and it's probably better since we're
> > basically inlining the return 0. Do you want me to send a v2 with this?
>
> I think both Andrea's and Daniel's versions of the fix are good.
> Note, however, that I missed one more configuration variable when
> making bpf_get_smp_processor_id() inlinable: CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT.
>
> Helper body:
>
>     BPF_CALL_0(bpf_get_smp_processor_id)
>     {
>         return smp_processor_id();
>     }
>
> smp_processor_id definition:
>
>     #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT
>       extern unsigned int debug_smp_processor_id(void);
>     # define smp_processor_id() debug_smp_processor_id()
>     #else
>     # define smp_processor_id() __smp_processor_id()
>     #endif

No. It's fine as-is.
We inline raw_smp_processor_id().

Patchew 2.1-devel-b67e4c2

© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.