drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
PCI config access is locked with pci_lock which is raw_spinlock.
Convert cfg_lock to raw_spinlock so that the lock usage is consistent
for RT kernel.
Reported as following:
[ 18.756807] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
[ 18.756810] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1617, name: nodedev-init
[ 18.756810] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
[ 18.756811] RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
[ 18.756811] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[ 18.756812] irq event stamp: 0
[ 18.756812] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[ 18.756815] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff864f1fe2>] copy_process+0xa62/0x2d90
[ 18.756819] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff864f1fe2>] copy_process+0xa62/0x2d90
[ 18.756820] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[ 18.756822] CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 1617 Comm: nodedev-init Tainted: G W 6.12.1 #11
[ 18.756823] Tainted: [W]=WARN
[ 18.756824] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Vostro 3710/0K1D6X, BIOS 1.14.0 06/09/2023
[ 18.756825] Call Trace:
[ 18.756826] <TASK>
[ 18.756827] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0
[ 18.756830] dump_stack+0x10/0x20
[ 18.756831] __might_resched+0x158/0x230
[ 18.756833] rt_spin_lock+0x4e/0x130
[ 18.756837] ? vmd_pci_read+0x8d/0x100 [vmd]
[ 18.756839] vmd_pci_read+0x8d/0x100 [vmd]
[ 18.756840] pci_user_read_config_byte+0x6f/0xe0
[ 18.756843] pci_read_config+0xfe/0x290
[ 18.756845] sysfs_kf_bin_read+0x68/0x90
[ 18.756847] kernfs_fop_read_iter+0xd7/0x200
[ 18.756850] vfs_read+0x26d/0x360
[ 18.756853] ksys_read+0x70/0xf0
[ 18.756855] __x64_sys_read+0x1a/0x20
[ 18.756857] x64_sys_call+0x1715/0x20d0
[ 18.756859] do_syscall_64+0x8f/0x170
[ 18.756861] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcd/0x2c0
[ 18.756863] ? do_syscall_64+0x9b/0x170
[ 18.756865] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
Signed-off-by: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@gmail.com>
---
drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
index 9d9596947..94ceec50a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct vmd_irq_list {
struct vmd_dev {
struct pci_dev *dev;
- spinlock_t cfg_lock;
+ raw_spinlock_t cfg_lock;
void __iomem *cfgbar;
int msix_count;
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static int vmd_pci_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
if (!addr)
return -EFAULT;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
switch (len) {
case 1:
*value = readb(addr);
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static int vmd_pci_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static int vmd_pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
if (!addr)
return -EFAULT;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
switch (len) {
case 1:
writeb(value, addr);
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int vmd_pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ static int vmd_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
if (features & VMD_FEAT_OFFSET_FIRST_VECTOR)
vmd->first_vec = 1;
- spin_lock_init(&vmd->cfg_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&vmd->cfg_lock);
pci_set_drvdata(dev, vmd);
err = vmd_enable_domain(vmd, features);
if (err)
--
2.34.1On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 11:13:21PM +0900, Ryo Takakura wrote:
> PCI config access is locked with pci_lock which is raw_spinlock.
> Convert cfg_lock to raw_spinlock so that the lock usage is consistent
> for RT kernel.
>
> Reported as following:
> [ 18.756807] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
> [ 18.756810] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1617, name: nodedev-init
> [ 18.756810] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
> [ 18.756811] RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
> [ 18.756811] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
> [ 18.756812] irq event stamp: 0
This problem has been discussed in the past at:
[PATCH v6.4-rc5-rt4] rt: vmd: make cfg_lock a raw spinlock
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/20230608210232.056e731f@gandalf.local.home/T/#t
And there was a suggestion to remove the lock altogether as (at the time) the
only two call sites of vmd_pci_read() were already protected by pci_lock.
I wrote the patch removing the lock and it worked as expected, but never
sent it to the list. If you think that for the current code that makes
sense, please have fun removing the lock. :)
Best regards,
Luis
> [ 18.756812] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
> [ 18.756815] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffff864f1fe2>] copy_process+0xa62/0x2d90
> [ 18.756819] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffff864f1fe2>] copy_process+0xa62/0x2d90
> [ 18.756820] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
> [ 18.756822] CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 1617 Comm: nodedev-init Tainted: G W 6.12.1 #11
> [ 18.756823] Tainted: [W]=WARN
> [ 18.756824] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Vostro 3710/0K1D6X, BIOS 1.14.0 06/09/2023
> [ 18.756825] Call Trace:
> [ 18.756826] <TASK>
> [ 18.756827] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0
> [ 18.756830] dump_stack+0x10/0x20
> [ 18.756831] __might_resched+0x158/0x230
> [ 18.756833] rt_spin_lock+0x4e/0x130
> [ 18.756837] ? vmd_pci_read+0x8d/0x100 [vmd]
> [ 18.756839] vmd_pci_read+0x8d/0x100 [vmd]
> [ 18.756840] pci_user_read_config_byte+0x6f/0xe0
> [ 18.756843] pci_read_config+0xfe/0x290
> [ 18.756845] sysfs_kf_bin_read+0x68/0x90
> [ 18.756847] kernfs_fop_read_iter+0xd7/0x200
> [ 18.756850] vfs_read+0x26d/0x360
> [ 18.756853] ksys_read+0x70/0xf0
> [ 18.756855] __x64_sys_read+0x1a/0x20
> [ 18.756857] x64_sys_call+0x1715/0x20d0
> [ 18.756859] do_syscall_64+0x8f/0x170
> [ 18.756861] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0xcd/0x2c0
> [ 18.756863] ? do_syscall_64+0x9b/0x170
> [ 18.756865] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> index 9d9596947..94ceec50a 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ struct vmd_irq_list {
> struct vmd_dev {
> struct pci_dev *dev;
>
> - spinlock_t cfg_lock;
> + raw_spinlock_t cfg_lock;
> void __iomem *cfgbar;
>
> int msix_count;
> @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static int vmd_pci_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
> if (!addr)
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
> switch (len) {
> case 1:
> *value = readb(addr);
> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static int vmd_pci_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
> ret = -EINVAL;
> break;
> }
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static int vmd_pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
> if (!addr)
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
> switch (len) {
> case 1:
> writeb(value, addr);
> @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static int vmd_pci_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int reg,
> ret = -EINVAL;
> break;
> }
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vmd->cfg_lock, flags);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ static int vmd_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> if (features & VMD_FEAT_OFFSET_FIRST_VECTOR)
> vmd->first_vec = 1;
>
> - spin_lock_init(&vmd->cfg_lock);
> + raw_spin_lock_init(&vmd->cfg_lock);
> pci_set_drvdata(dev, vmd);
> err = vmd_enable_domain(vmd, features);
> if (err)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
---end quoted text---
Hi Luis, On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 11:33:56 -0300, Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote: >On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 11:13:21PM +0900, Ryo Takakura wrote: >> PCI config access is locked with pci_lock which is raw_spinlock. >> Convert cfg_lock to raw_spinlock so that the lock usage is consistent >> for RT kernel. >> >> Reported as following: >> [ 18.756807] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48 >> [ 18.756810] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1617, name: nodedev-init >> [ 18.756810] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 >> [ 18.756811] RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 >> [ 18.756811] INFO: lockdep is turned off. >> [ 18.756812] irq event stamp: 0 > >This problem has been discussed in the past at: > > [PATCH v6.4-rc5-rt4] rt: vmd: make cfg_lock a raw spinlock > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/20230608210232.056e731f@gandalf.local.home/T/#t > >And there was a suggestion to remove the lock altogether as (at the time) the >only two call sites of vmd_pci_read() were already protected by pci_lock. > >I wrote the patch removing the lock and it worked as expected, but never >sent it to the list. If you think that for the current code that makes >sense, please have fun removing the lock. :) I see, thanks for the link! I took a look at current the code and I think that cfg_lock can still safely be removed as explained by Sebastian [0]. I'll send another patch shortly! >Best regards, >Luis Sincerely, Ryo Takakura [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/20230620154434.MosrzRUh@linutronix.de/
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.