security/bpf/hooks.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
free_task() already calls bpf_task_storage_free(). It is not necessary
to call it again on security_task_free(). Remove the hook.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
---
This was initially sent in a patchset [1]. However, this patch is not
closely related to other patches in the set, so sending it alone.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241112083700.356299-1-song@kernel.org/
---
security/bpf/hooks.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/bpf/hooks.c b/security/bpf/hooks.c
index 3663aec7bcbd..db759025abe1 100644
--- a/security/bpf/hooks.c
+++ b/security/bpf/hooks.c
@@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ static struct security_hook_list bpf_lsm_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
#include <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h>
#undef LSM_HOOK
LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_free_security, bpf_inode_storage_free),
- LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_free, bpf_task_storage_free),
};
static const struct lsm_id bpf_lsmid = {
--
2.43.5
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 11:59:56PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> free_task() already calls bpf_task_storage_free(). It is not necessary
> to call it again on security_task_free(). Remove the hook.
Acked-by: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
>
> ---
>
> This was initially sent in a patchset [1]. However, this patch is not
> closely related to other patches in the set, so sending it alone.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241112083700.356299-1-song@kernel.org/
> ---
> security/bpf/hooks.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/bpf/hooks.c b/security/bpf/hooks.c
> index 3663aec7bcbd..db759025abe1 100644
> --- a/security/bpf/hooks.c
> +++ b/security/bpf/hooks.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ static struct security_hook_list bpf_lsm_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
> #include <linux/lsm_hook_defs.h>
> #undef LSM_HOOK
> LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_free_security, bpf_inode_storage_free),
> - LSM_HOOK_INIT(task_free, bpf_task_storage_free),
> };
>
> static const struct lsm_id bpf_lsmid = {
> --
> 2.43.5
>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.