[PATCH net] net: dsa: tag_ocelot_8021q: fix broken reception

Robert Hodaszi posted 1 patch 1 year ago
There is a newer version of this series
net/dsa/tag_ocelot_8021q.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
[PATCH net] net: dsa: tag_ocelot_8021q: fix broken reception
Posted by Robert Hodaszi 1 year ago
Commit dcfe7673787b4bfea2c213df443d312aa754757b ("net: dsa: tag_sja1105:
absorb logic for not overwriting precise info into dsa_8021q_rcv()")
added support to let the DSA switch driver set source_port and
switch_id. tag_8021q's logic overrides the previously set source_port
and switch_id only if they are marked as "invalid" (-1). sja1105 and
vsc73xx drivers are doing that properly, but ocelot_8021q driver doesn't
initialize those variables. That causes dsa_8021q_rcv() doesn't set
them, and they remain unassigned.

Initialize them as invalid to so dsa_8021q_rcv() can return with the
proper values.

Fixes: dcfe7673787b ("net: dsa: tag_sja1105: absorb logic for not overwriting precise info into dsa_8021q_rcv()")
Signed-off-by: Robert Hodaszi <robert.hodaszi@digi.com>
---
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 net/dsa/tag_ocelot_8021q.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_ocelot_8021q.c b/net/dsa/tag_ocelot_8021q.c
index 8e8b1bef6af6..11ea8cfd6266 100644
--- a/net/dsa/tag_ocelot_8021q.c
+++ b/net/dsa/tag_ocelot_8021q.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *ocelot_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
 static struct sk_buff *ocelot_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb,
 				  struct net_device *netdev)
 {
-	int src_port, switch_id;
+	int src_port = -1, switch_id = -1;
 
 	dsa_8021q_rcv(skb, &src_port, &switch_id, NULL, NULL);
 
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: tag_ocelot_8021q: fix broken reception
Posted by Andrew Lunn 1 year ago
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 03:29:32PM +0100, Robert Hodaszi wrote:
> Commit dcfe7673787b4bfea2c213df443d312aa754757b ("net: dsa: tag_sja1105:
> absorb logic for not overwriting precise info into dsa_8021q_rcv()")
> added support to let the DSA switch driver set source_port and
> switch_id. tag_8021q's logic overrides the previously set source_port
> and switch_id only if they are marked as "invalid" (-1). sja1105 and
> vsc73xx drivers are doing that properly, but ocelot_8021q driver doesn't
> initialize those variables. That causes dsa_8021q_rcv() doesn't set
> them, and they remain unassigned.
> 
> Initialize them as invalid to so dsa_8021q_rcv() can return with the
> proper values.
> 
> Fixes: dcfe7673787b ("net: dsa: tag_sja1105: absorb logic for not overwriting precise info into dsa_8021q_rcv()")
> Signed-off-by: Robert Hodaszi <robert.hodaszi@digi.com>

Hi Robert

The code is easy, processes are hard.

We ask that you put a version number in the subject

[PATCH v2 net] ....

That helps us keep track of the different versions of a patch.

Please wait 24 hours, and then post v3 with Vladimirs suggestions.

    Andrew

---
pw-bot: cr
Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: tag_ocelot_8021q: fix broken reception
Posted by Robert Hodaszi 1 year ago
2024. 12. 11. 17:11 keltezéssel, Andrew Lunn írta:
> [EXTERNAL E-MAIL] Warning! This email originated outside of the organization! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 03:29:32PM +0100, Robert Hodaszi wrote:
>> Commit dcfe7673787b4bfea2c213df443d312aa754757b ("net: dsa: tag_sja1105:
>> absorb logic for not overwriting precise info into dsa_8021q_rcv()")
>> added support to let the DSA switch driver set source_port and
>> switch_id. tag_8021q's logic overrides the previously set source_port
>> and switch_id only if they are marked as "invalid" (-1). sja1105 and
>> vsc73xx drivers are doing that properly, but ocelot_8021q driver doesn't
>> initialize those variables. That causes dsa_8021q_rcv() doesn't set
>> them, and they remain unassigned.
>>
>> Initialize them as invalid to so dsa_8021q_rcv() can return with the
>> proper values.
>>
>> Fixes: dcfe7673787b ("net: dsa: tag_sja1105: absorb logic for not overwriting precise info into dsa_8021q_rcv()")
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Hodaszi <robert.hodaszi@digi.com>
> Hi Robert
>
> The code is easy, processes are hard.
>
> We ask that you put a version number in the subject
>
> [PATCH v2 net] ....
>
> That helps us keep track of the different versions of a patch.
>
> Please wait 24 hours, and then post v3 with Vladimirs suggestions.
>
>     Andrew
>
> ---
> pw-bot: cr

I already sent out one with '[PATCH net v2]'. Vladimir reviewed that. (Sorry for this email burst!)

Robert