of_syscon_register_regmap() was added for nodes which need a custom
regmap setup. It's not really correct for those nodes to claim they are
compatible with "syscon" as the default handling likely doesn't work in
those cases. If device_node_get_regmap() happens to be called first,
then of_syscon_register() will be called and an incorrect regmap will be
created (barring some other error). That may lead to unknown results in
the worst case. In the best case, of_syscon_register_regmap() will fail
with -EEXIST. This problem remains unless these cases drop "syscon" (an
ABI issue) or we exclude them using their specific compatible. ATM,
there is only one user: "google,gs101-pmu"
There are also cases of adding "syscon" compatible to existing nodes
after the fact in order to register the syscon. That presents a
potential DT ABI problem. Instead, if there's a kernel change needing a
syscon for a node, then it should be possible to allow the kernel to
register a syscon without a DT change. That's only possible by using
of_syscon_register_regmap() currently, but in the future we may want to
support a match list for cases which don't need a custom regmap.
With this change, the lookup functions will succeed for any node
registered by of_syscon_register_regmap() regardless of whether the node
compatible contains "syscon".
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
---
drivers/mfd/syscon.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/syscon.c b/drivers/mfd/syscon.c
index bfb1f69fcff1..e6df2825c14d 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/syscon.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/syscon.c
@@ -171,8 +171,10 @@ static struct regmap *device_node_get_regmap(struct device_node *np,
break;
}
- if (!syscon)
+ if (!syscon && of_device_is_compatible(np, "syscon"))
syscon = of_syscon_register(np, check_res);
+ else
+ syscon = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
mutex_unlock(&syscon_list_lock);
@@ -238,9 +240,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_node_to_regmap);
struct regmap *syscon_node_to_regmap(struct device_node *np)
{
- if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "syscon"))
- return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-
return device_node_get_regmap(np, true);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(syscon_node_to_regmap);
--
2.45.2
Hi Rob,
On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 14:57:14 -0600 Rob Herring wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/syscon.c b/drivers/mfd/syscon.c
> index bfb1f69fcff1..e6df2825c14d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/syscon.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/syscon.c
> @@ -171,8 +171,10 @@ static struct regmap *device_node_get_regmap(struct device_node *np,
> break;
> }
>
> - if (!syscon)
> + if (!syscon && of_device_is_compatible(np, "syscon"))
> syscon = of_syscon_register(np, check_res);
> + else
> + syscon = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
The current modification will make device_node_get_regmap() return -EINVAL even
for syscons that were already found in the syscon_list, which I believe is not
the intended behavior.
I suggest modifying it this way to maintain lookup functionality for registered
syscons while implementing your intended changes:
static struct regmap *device_node_get_regmap(struct device_node *np,
bool check_res)
{
struct syscon *entry, *syscon = NULL;
struct regmap *regmap;
mutex_lock(&syscon_list_lock);
list_for_each_entry(entry, &syscon_list, list)
if (entry->np == np) {
syscon = entry;
break;
}
if (syscon) {
regmap = syscon->regmap;
mutex_unlock(&syscon_list_lock);
return regmap;
}
if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "syscon")) {
syscon = of_syscon_register(np, check_res);
mutex_unlock(&syscon_list_lock);
if (IS_ERR(syscon))
return ERR_CAST(syscon);
return syscon->regmap;
}
mutex_unlock(&syscon_list_lock);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
The above is the resulting working function I've obtained while testing with
different scenarios. This ensures that:
1. Already registered syscons are found and returned correctly
2. New syscons with "syscon" compatible are registered as before
3. Nodes without "syscon" compatible return -EINVAL only if not found in the list
This has been tested with my v1 syscon work [1] and with v2, where I remove the
"syscon" compatible string for custom regmap initialization, aligning with your
goals for this series.
Let me know if I should add this series as a dependency of my v2 or how I should proceed.
Thanks,
John Madieu
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241206212559.192705-2-john.madieu.xa@bp.renesas.com
On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 2:34 PM John Madieu
<john.madieu.xa@bp.renesas.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 14:57:14 -0600 Rob Herring wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/syscon.c b/drivers/mfd/syscon.c
> > index bfb1f69fcff1..e6df2825c14d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/syscon.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/syscon.c
> > @@ -171,8 +171,10 @@ static struct regmap *device_node_get_regmap(struct device_node *np,
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!syscon)
> > + if (!syscon && of_device_is_compatible(np, "syscon"))
> > syscon = of_syscon_register(np, check_res);
> > + else
> > + syscon = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> The current modification will make device_node_get_regmap() return -EINVAL even
> for syscons that were already found in the syscon_list, which I believe is not
> the intended behavior.
Yes, it is. Doesn't Will's fix work for you?
>
> I suggest modifying it this way to maintain lookup functionality for registered
> syscons while implementing your intended changes:
>
> static struct regmap *device_node_get_regmap(struct device_node *np,
> bool check_res)
> {
> struct syscon *entry, *syscon = NULL;
> struct regmap *regmap;
>
> mutex_lock(&syscon_list_lock);
>
> list_for_each_entry(entry, &syscon_list, list)
> if (entry->np == np) {
> syscon = entry;
> break;
> }
>
> if (syscon) {
> regmap = syscon->regmap;
> mut ix_unlock(&syscon_list_lock);
> return regmap;
> }
>
> if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "syscon")) {
> syscon = of_syscon_register(np, check_res);
> mutex_unlock(&syscon_list_lock);
> if (IS_ERR(syscon))
> return ERR_CAST(syscon);
> return syscon->regmap;
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&syscon_list_lock);
3 unlock calls is a sign the code structure could be improved. A goto
or a guard() for example. However, I think this is the same logic as
what Will suggested.
Rob
Hi Rob,
Thanks for working on this!
On 12/11/2024, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> of_syscon_register_regmap() was added for nodes which need a custom
> regmap setup. It's not really correct for those nodes to claim they are
> compatible with "syscon" as the default handling likely doesn't work in
> those cases. If device_node_get_regmap() happens to be called first,
> then of_syscon_register() will be called and an incorrect regmap will be
> created (barring some other error). That may lead to unknown results in
> the worst case. In the best case, of_syscon_register_regmap() will fail
> with -EEXIST. This problem remains unless these cases drop "syscon" (an
> ABI issue) or we exclude them using their specific compatible. ATM,
> there is only one user: "google,gs101-pmu"
>
> There are also cases of adding "syscon" compatible to existing nodes
> after the fact in order to register the syscon. That presents a
> potential DT ABI problem. Instead, if there's a kernel change needing a
> syscon for a node, then it should be possible to allow the kernel to
> register a syscon without a DT change. That's only possible by using
> of_syscon_register_regmap() currently, but in the future we may want to
> support a match list for cases which don't need a custom regmap.
>
> With this change, the lookup functions will succeed for any node
> registered by of_syscon_register_regmap() regardless of whether the node
> compatible contains "syscon".
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/syscon.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/syscon.c b/drivers/mfd/syscon.c
> index bfb1f69fcff1..e6df2825c14d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/syscon.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/syscon.c
> @@ -171,8 +171,10 @@ static struct regmap *device_node_get_regmap(struct device_node *np,
> break;
> }
>
> - if (!syscon)
> + if (!syscon && of_device_is_compatible(np, "syscon"))
> syscon = of_syscon_register(np, check_res);
> + else
> + syscon = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
This else case actually breaks Pixel 6 (Tensor) since you are now returning
-EINVAL when the syscon is created by the exynos-pmu driver and present in the
list. Instead you should only return -EINVAL if the syscon doesn't exist and
the device node is not a compatible syscon device. If you still want to check
for `of_device_is_compatible(np, "syscon")` even when the syscon is found in
the list, that should be okay , but it's probably best to check that before
inserting the regmap in the list to begin with.
This worked for me on my Pixel 6 device:
if (!syscon) {
if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "syscon"))
syscon = of_syscon_register(np, check_res);
else
syscon = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
Thanks,
Will
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.