Test contended "wait-for-all" waits, to make sure that scheduling and wakeup
logic works correctly, and that the wait only exits once objects are all
simultaneously signaled.
Signed-off-by: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@codeweavers.com>
---
.../testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
index 993f5db23768..b77fb0b2c4b1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
@@ -706,4 +706,102 @@ TEST(wake_any)
close(fd);
}
+TEST(wake_all)
+{
+ struct ntsync_mutex_args mutex_args = {0};
+ struct ntsync_wait_args wait_args = {0};
+ struct ntsync_sem_args sem_args = {0};
+ struct wait_args thread_args;
+ int objs[2], fd, ret;
+ __u32 count, index;
+ pthread_t thread;
+
+ fd = open("/dev/ntsync", O_CLOEXEC | O_RDONLY);
+ ASSERT_LE(0, fd);
+
+ sem_args.count = 0;
+ sem_args.max = 3;
+ sem_args.sem = 0xdeadbeef;
+ ret = ioctl(fd, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_SEM, &sem_args);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+ EXPECT_NE(0xdeadbeef, sem_args.sem);
+
+ mutex_args.owner = 123;
+ mutex_args.count = 1;
+ mutex_args.mutex = 0xdeadbeef;
+ ret = ioctl(fd, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_MUTEX, &mutex_args);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+ EXPECT_NE(0xdeadbeef, mutex_args.mutex);
+
+ objs[0] = sem_args.sem;
+ objs[1] = mutex_args.mutex;
+
+ wait_args.timeout = get_abs_timeout(1000);
+ wait_args.objs = (uintptr_t)objs;
+ wait_args.count = 2;
+ wait_args.owner = 456;
+ thread_args.fd = fd;
+ thread_args.args = &wait_args;
+ thread_args.request = NTSYNC_IOC_WAIT_ALL;
+ ret = pthread_create(&thread, NULL, wait_thread, &thread_args);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+
+ ret = wait_for_thread(thread, 100);
+ EXPECT_EQ(ETIMEDOUT, ret);
+
+ count = 1;
+ ret = post_sem(sem_args.sem, &count);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, count);
+
+ ret = pthread_tryjoin_np(thread, NULL);
+ EXPECT_EQ(EBUSY, ret);
+
+ check_sem_state(sem_args.sem, 1, 3);
+
+ ret = wait_any(fd, 1, &sem_args.sem, 123, &index);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, index);
+
+ ret = unlock_mutex(mutex_args.mutex, 123, &count);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, count);
+
+ ret = pthread_tryjoin_np(thread, NULL);
+ EXPECT_EQ(EBUSY, ret);
+
+ check_mutex_state(mutex_args.mutex, 0, 0);
+
+ count = 2;
+ ret = post_sem(sem_args.sem, &count);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, count);
+ check_sem_state(sem_args.sem, 1, 3);
+ check_mutex_state(mutex_args.mutex, 1, 456);
+
+ ret = wait_for_thread(thread, 100);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, thread_args.ret);
+
+ /* delete an object while it's being waited on */
+
+ wait_args.timeout = get_abs_timeout(200);
+ wait_args.owner = 123;
+ ret = pthread_create(&thread, NULL, wait_thread, &thread_args);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+
+ ret = wait_for_thread(thread, 100);
+ EXPECT_EQ(ETIMEDOUT, ret);
+
+ close(sem_args.sem);
+ close(mutex_args.mutex);
+
+ ret = wait_for_thread(thread, 200);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, ret);
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, thread_args.ret);
+ EXPECT_EQ(ETIMEDOUT, thread_args.err);
+
+ close(fd);
+}
+
TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
--
2.45.2