1. Patchew
  2. linux
  3. [PATCH 0/6] arm64: errata: Add Qualcomm CPUs to the Spectre mitigation lists
  4. View patch

[PATCH 6/6] arm64: errata: Add QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD/PRIME to the spectre_bhb_k32_list

Douglas Anderson posted 6 patches 1 year, 2 months ago
[PATCH 6/6] arm64: errata: Add QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD/PRIME to the spectre_bhb_k32_list
Posted by Douglas Anderson 1 year, 2 months ago 
Qualcomm Kryo 600-series Gold cores appear to have a derivative of an
ARM Cortex A78 / ARM Cortex X1 in them. Since these need Spectre
mitigation then the Kyro 600-series Gold/Prime cores also should need
Spectre mitigation.

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
Yes. I know. This patch DOESN'T COMPILE because
MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD and MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_PRIME are not
defined. Those value needs to come from Qualcomm or from testing on
hardware, which I don't have. Qualcomm needs to chime in to confirm
that this Spectre mitigation is correct anyway, though. I'm including
this patch so it's obvious that I think these cores also need the
mitigation.

 arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c
index 212481726f04..67aa54017dea 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c
@@ -860,6 +860,8 @@ u8 spectre_bhb_loop_affected(int scope)
 			MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_X2),
 			MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NEOVERSE_N2),
 			MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NEOVERSE_V1),
+			MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD),
+			MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_PRIME),
 			{},
 		};
 		static const struct midr_range spectre_bhb_k24_list[] = {
-- 
2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog
Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: errata: Add QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD/PRIME to the spectre_bhb_k32_list
Posted by kernel test robot 1 year, 2 months ago 
Hi Douglas,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test ERROR on arm-perf/for-next/perf kvmarm/next soc/for-next arm/for-next arm/fixes linus/master v6.13-rc2 next-20241210]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Douglas-Anderson/arm64-errata-Add-QCOM_KRYO_4XX_GOLD-to-the-spectre_bhb_k24_list/20241210-014833
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241209094310.6.I722621804be859e4ae4b7479ce191c5e3367b37c%40changeid
patch subject: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: errata: Add QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD/PRIME to the spectre_bhb_k32_list
config: arm64-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241211/202412110032.Sku0iZvD-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241211/202412110032.Sku0iZvD-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412110032.Sku0iZvD-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h:43,
                    from include/linux/cache.h:6,
                    from include/linux/jiffies.h:5,
                    from include/linux/ktime.h:25,
                    from include/linux/timer.h:6,
                    from include/linux/workqueue.h:9,
                    from include/linux/bpf.h:10,
                    from arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:21:
   arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c: In function 'spectre_bhb_loop_affected':
>> arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:863:43: error: 'MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_4XX_GOLD'?
     863 |                         MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD),
         |                                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h:251:26: note: in definition of macro 'MIDR_RANGE'
     251 |                 .model = m,                                     \
         |                          ^
   arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:863:25: note: in expansion of macro 'MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS'
     863 |                         MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD),
         |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:863:43: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
     863 |                         MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD),
         |                                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h:251:26: note: in definition of macro 'MIDR_RANGE'
     251 |                 .model = m,                                     \
         |                          ^
   arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:863:25: note: in expansion of macro 'MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS'
     863 |                         MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD),
         |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:864:43: error: 'MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_PRIME' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_3XX_SILVER'?
     864 |                         MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_PRIME),
         |                                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h:251:26: note: in definition of macro 'MIDR_RANGE'
     251 |                 .model = m,                                     \
         |                          ^
   arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:864:25: note: in expansion of macro 'MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS'
     864 |                         MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_PRIME),
         |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:872:43: error: 'MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_5XX_GOLD' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_4XX_GOLD'?
     872 |                         MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_5XX_GOLD),
         |                                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h:251:26: note: in definition of macro 'MIDR_RANGE'
     251 |                 .model = m,                                     \
         |                          ^
   arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:872:25: note: in expansion of macro 'MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS'
     872 |                         MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_5XX_GOLD),
         |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +863 arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c

   843	
   844	/*
   845	 * This must be called with SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU for each type of CPU, before any
   846	 * SCOPE_SYSTEM call will give the right answer.
   847	 */
   848	u8 spectre_bhb_loop_affected(int scope)
   849	{
   850		u8 k = 0;
   851		static u8 max_bhb_k;
   852	
   853		if (scope == SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU) {
   854			static const struct midr_range spectre_bhb_k32_list[] = {
   855				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A78),
   856				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A78AE),
   857				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A78C),
   858				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_X1),
   859				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A710),
   860				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_X2),
   861				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NEOVERSE_N2),
   862				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NEOVERSE_V1),
 > 863				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD),
 > 864				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_PRIME),
   865				{},
   866			};
   867			static const struct midr_range spectre_bhb_k24_list[] = {
   868				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A76),
   869				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A77),
   870				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NEOVERSE_N1),
   871				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_4XX_GOLD),
   872				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_5XX_GOLD),
   873				{},
   874			};
   875			static const struct midr_range spectre_bhb_k11_list[] = {
   876				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_AMPERE1),
   877				{},
   878			};
   879			static const struct midr_range spectre_bhb_k8_list[] = {
   880				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A72),
   881				MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A57),
   882				{},
   883			};
   884	
   885			if (is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), spectre_bhb_k32_list))
   886				k = 32;
   887			else if (is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), spectre_bhb_k24_list))
   888				k = 24;
   889			else if (is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), spectre_bhb_k11_list))
   890				k = 11;
   891			else if (is_midr_in_range_list(read_cpuid_id(), spectre_bhb_k8_list))
   892				k =  8;
   893	
   894			max_bhb_k = max(max_bhb_k, k);
   895		} else {
   896			k = max_bhb_k;
   897		}
   898	
   899		return k;
   900	}
   901	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: errata: Add QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD/PRIME to the spectre_bhb_k32_list
Posted by Dmitry Baryshkov 1 year, 2 months ago 
On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 09:43:16AM -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> Qualcomm Kryo 600-series Gold cores appear to have a derivative of an
> ARM Cortex A78 / ARM Cortex X1 in them. Since these need Spectre
> mitigation then the Kyro 600-series Gold/Prime cores also should need
> Spectre mitigation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
> Yes. I know. This patch DOESN'T COMPILE because
> MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD and MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_PRIME are not
> defined. Those value needs to come from Qualcomm or from testing on
> hardware, which I don't have. Qualcomm needs to chime in to confirm
> that this Spectre mitigation is correct anyway, though. I'm including
> this patch so it's obvious that I think these cores also need the
> mitigation.

SM8350 (Kryo 680) identifies itself as 0x41/0xd44 (Prime), 0x41/0xd41
(Gold) and 0x41/0xd05 (Silver)

> 
>  arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c
> index 212481726f04..67aa54017dea 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c
> @@ -860,6 +860,8 @@ u8 spectre_bhb_loop_affected(int scope)
>  			MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_X2),
>  			MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NEOVERSE_N2),
>  			MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NEOVERSE_V1),
> +			MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD),
> +			MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_PRIME),
>  			{},
>  		};
>  		static const struct midr_range spectre_bhb_k24_list[] = {
> -- 
> 2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry
Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: errata: Add QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD/PRIME to the spectre_bhb_k32_list
Posted by Doug Anderson 1 year, 1 month ago 
Hi,

On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 3:09 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 09:43:16AM -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > Qualcomm Kryo 600-series Gold cores appear to have a derivative of an
> > ARM Cortex A78 / ARM Cortex X1 in them. Since these need Spectre
> > mitigation then the Kyro 600-series Gold/Prime cores also should need
> > Spectre mitigation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > Yes. I know. This patch DOESN'T COMPILE because
> > MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_GOLD and MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_6XX_PRIME are not
> > defined. Those value needs to come from Qualcomm or from testing on
> > hardware, which I don't have. Qualcomm needs to chime in to confirm
> > that this Spectre mitigation is correct anyway, though. I'm including
> > this patch so it's obvious that I think these cores also need the
> > mitigation.
>
> SM8350 (Kryo 680) identifies itself as 0x41/0xd44 (Prime), 0x41/0xd41
> (Gold) and 0x41/0xd05 (Silver)

Wow, all standard ARM cores. OK, I guess we can drop this patch too then. Nice!


-Doug

Patchew 2.1-devel-b67e4c2

© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.